Trilaciclib (G1T28) in Patients With Previously Treated Extensive Stage SCLC Receiving Topotecan Chemotherapy
NCT ID: NCT02514447
Last Updated: 2025-09-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
123 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-05
2021-10-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study consisted of 2 parts: a limited open-label, dose-finding portion (Part 1), and a randomized double-blind portion (Part 2). Both parts included 3 study phases: Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and Survival Follow-up Phase. The Treatment Phase began on the day of first dose with study treatment and completes at the Post-Treatment Visit.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paclitaxel Plus Topotecan in Treating Patients With Solid Tumors
NCT00002587
Weekly Topotecan in Combination With Carboplatin in Two Different Schedules for Refractory and/or Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT00193583
Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the CDK 4/6 Inhibitor G1T28-1
NCT02243150
A Phase I Study Of Oral Topotecan And Lapatinib In Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT00682279
Topotecan in Treating Patients With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00003917
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who received placebo in Part 2A and Part 2B were to be combined into a single placebo group for the analysis to compare with trilaciclib+topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 with placebo + topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 (proximately 30 per treatment group).
The sample size calculation was to demonstrate the superiority of trilaciclib + topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 over placebo + topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 with respect to at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The overall type I error rate was 1-sided 0.10. Using the most conservative Bonferroni procedure for the 2 primary endpoints, a 1-sided individual type I error rate 0.10/2=0.05 was assigned to each outcome variable (DSN in Cycle 1 and occurrence of SN) in the sample size calculation. Assuming a common standard deviation of 2.5, a difference in the duration of SN in Cycle 1 of at least 2 days between the treatment groups, a sample size of 28 per arm was required to have 90% power to detect the assumed treatment effect. For occurrence of SN, assuming the event rate was 45% for placebo group, to detect an absolute reduction of 37% by trilaciclib group with 90% power would require a sample size of at least 29 per arm. Thus, 30 per arm was needed to ensure 90% power to detect assumed treatment effect for DSN in Cycle 1 and occurrence of SN. All calculations were carried out using the POWER procedure in SAS®, Version 9.4 procedure in SAS®, Version 9.4 or higher.
The results from endpoints that were commonly collected at Part 1 and part 2 are presented together in this report.
The posted results represent the final results of Study G1T28-03, a Phase 1b/2a safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of trilaciclib (G1T28) in patients with previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving topotecan chemotherapy in the second/third-line (2/3L) setting. The final myelopreservation efficacy results for both parts and exposure for Part 1 are from database lock 1 (data cut-off \[DCO\] for Primary Completion Date \[PCD\] 28 September 2018). The final anti-tumor efficacy (BOR, DOR, PFS) for both parts, final overall survival for Part 1 and exposure data from Part 2 are from a second database lock 2 (DCO 31 May 2019) and the final overall survival for Part 2 and safety (adverse events) are through the end of the study on October 4, 2021 which resulted in the final database lock (DCO 01 Nov 2021).
The maximum time frames provided reflect the time from when the first patient could be evaluated for an endpoint (ie. date of first dose of first patient) to the time when the data from both parts presented for that endpoint was considered final.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b
Patients in Parts 2a and 2b were randomized 1:2 to placebo. Patients received placebo administered IV once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of placebo on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m²).
Placebo
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a
Patients in Part 2a were randomized 2:1 to trilaciclib. Patients received trilaciclib (240 mg/m²) administered IV once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (0.75 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b
Patients in Part 2b were randomized 2:1 to trilaciclib. Patients received trilaciclib (240 mg/m²) administered IV once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1
Patients received trilaciclib (200 mg/m²) administered intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (1.50 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1
Patients received trilaciclib (200 mg/m²) administered intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (1.25 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1
Patients received trilaciclib (200 mg/m²) administered intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (0.75 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1
Patients received trilaciclib (240 mg/m²) administered intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (0.75 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1
Patients received trilaciclib (280 mg/m²) administered intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (0.75 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1
Patients received trilaciclib (240 mg/m²) administered intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day topotecan chemotherapy cycle.
Following administration of trilaciclib on Days 1 to 5, patients received IV topotecan (1.0 mg/m²).
Trilaciclib
Topotecan
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Trilaciclib
Placebo
Topotecan
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Confirmed diagnosis of SCLC by histology or cytology, preferably including the presence of neuroendocrine features by immunohistochemistry
* Progression during or after prior first- or second-line chemotherapy and eligible to receive topotecan therapy
* At least 1 target lesion that is measurable by RECIST, Version 1.1
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2
* Adequate organ function
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncontrolled ischemic heart disease or uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure
* Known history of stroke or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to enrollment
* Other uncontrolled serious chronic disease or conditions that in the investigator's opinion could affect compliance or follow-up in the protocol
* Concurrent radiotherapy to any site or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment or previous radiotherapy to the target lesion sites
* Receipt of any systemic chemotherapy regimen within 4 weeks prior to enrollment or a noncytotoxic investigational medication within 2 weeks prior to enrollment
* History of topotecan treatment for SCLC
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clinical Contact
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Genesis Cancer Center
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Highlands Oncology Group
Rogers, Arkansas, United States
Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group, Inc.
Corona, California, United States
Sutter Medical Group
Sacramento, California, United States
The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
Whittier, California, United States
Memorial Hospital - University of Colorado Health
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
Denver, Colorado, United States
University of Colorado Health, Oncology Clinical Research Northern Region
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists - South
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists - North
Tavares, Florida, United States
University Cancer and Blood Center, LLC
Athens, Georgia, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northside Hospital - Georgia Cancer Specialists
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Norris Cotton Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates PC
East Setauket, New York, United States
Regional Medical Oncology Center
Wilson, North Carolina, United States
Gabrail Cancer Center
Canton, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma University - Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Guthrie Medical Group, PC
Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States
AnMed Health
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Greenville Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Gibbs Cancer Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Hanna Cancer Associates - University of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Meharry Medical College
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Texas Oncology- Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
M.D. Anderson
Houston, Texas, United States
Millennium Oncology
Houston, Texas, United States
Southwest Cancer Center
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Texas Oncology
Tyler, Texas, United States
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler
Tyler, Texas, United States
Virginia Cancer Specialists
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Virginia Oncology Associates
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.
Vancouver, Washington, United States
AZ Klina
Brasschaat, , Belgium
University Clinical Centre Banja Luka
Banja Luka, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University Clinical Centre Sarajevo
Sarajevo, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinical Hospital Centre Osijek
Osijek, , Croatia
University Clinical Hospital Centre " Sestre Milosrdnice"
Zagreb, , Croatia
University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Clinic For Pulmonary Diseases Jordanovac
Zagreb, , Croatia
University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology Skopje
Skopje, , North Macedonia
Clinic for Pulmology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
Belgrade, , Serbia
Clinical Hospital Centre Bezanijska Kosa
Belgrade, , Serbia
Oncology and Radiology Institute of Serbia
Belgrade, , Serbia
Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina Clinic for Thoracic Oncology
Kamenitz, , Serbia
Clinical Center Nis, Clinic for Lung Diseases
Niš, , Serbia
VOU Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology
Košice, , Slovakia
POKO POPRAD, s.r.o.
Poprad, , Slovakia
University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik
Golnik, , Slovenia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hart LL, Ferrarotto R, Andric ZG, Beck JT, Subramanian J, Radosavljevic DZ, Zaric B, Hanna WT, Aljumaily R, Owonikoko TK, Verhoeven D, Xiao J, Morris SR, Antal JM, Hussein MA. Myelopreservation with Trilaciclib in Patients Receiving Topotecan for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):350-365. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01538-0. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Li C, Horton JK, Sale M, Curd L, Goti V, Tao W, Beelen A. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Studies Between Trilaciclib and Midazolam, Metformin, Rifampin, Itraconazole, and Topotecan in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):679-692. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01179-x. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
Hussein M, Maglakelidze M, Richards DA, Sabatini M, Gersten TA, Lerro K, Sinielnikov I, Spira A, Pritchett Y, Antal JM, Malik R, Beck JT. Myeloprotective Effects of Trilaciclib Among Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer at Increased Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Pooled Results from Three Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Aug 9;13:6207-6218. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S313045. eCollection 2021.
Ferrarotto R, Anderson I, Medgyasszay B, Garcia-Campelo MR, Edenfield W, Feinstein TM, Johnson JM, Kalmadi S, Lammers PE, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Pritchett Y, Morris SR, Malik RK, Csoszi T. Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy reduces the usage of supportive care interventions for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with small cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis of three randomized phase 2 trials. Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):5748-5756. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4089. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Li C, Hart L, Owonikoko TK, Aljumaily R, Rocha Lima CM, Conkling PR, Webb RT, Jotte RM, Schuster S, Edenfield WJ, Smith DA, Sale M, Roberts PJ, Malik RK, Sorrentino JA. Trilaciclib dose selection: an integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of preclinical data and Phase Ib/IIa studies in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 May;87(5):689-700. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04239-9. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Region 1
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Region 2
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Myelopreservation with Trilaciclib in Patients Receiving Topotecan for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-004611-13
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
G1T28-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.