Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial to Assess the Effects of an Antimicrobial Mouthwash on the Esophageal Microbiome (NCT NCT02513784)

NCT ID: NCT02513784

Last Updated: 2022-09-22

Results Overview

Within individual change in relative abundance of F nucleatum in oral samples

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

20 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

21 days

Results posted on

2022-09-22

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Antibacterial Mouthwash
Subjects will be randomized to twice daily chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 21 days. Chlorhexidine gluconate: Chlorhexidine gluconate is a germicidal mouthwash that reduces bacteria in the mouth.
No Intervention
Subjects will be randomized to no intervention for 21 days.
Overall Study
STARTED
10
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Trial to Assess the Effects of an Antimicrobial Mouthwash on the Esophageal Microbiome

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Antibacterial Mouthwash
n=10 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to twice daily chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 21 days. Chlorhexidine gluconate: Chlorhexidine gluconate is a germicidal mouthwash that reduces bacteria in the mouth.
No Intervention
n=10 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to no intervention for 21 days.
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=5 Participants
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 • n=7 Participants
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Use
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Aspirin Use
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ever Smoker
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) History
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index
29.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=5 Participants
31.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=7 Participants
30.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=5 Participants
Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR)
0.94 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=5 Participants
0.92 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=7 Participants
0.93 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=5 Participants
Fat Intake
35 % calories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=5 Participants
33.5 % calories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=7 Participants
34.3 % calories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=5 Participants
Fiber intake
14.0 gm/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=5 Participants
13.6 gm/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=7 Participants
13.8 gm/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Reflux symptoms
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Abdominal pain
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Dyspepsia
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Other
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Endoscopic Findings
Reflux esophagitis
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Endoscopic Findings
Varices
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Endoscopic Findings
Normal esophagus
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 21 days

Population: Data was not collected and analyzed for F. Nucleatum in particular, instead an analysis was done for the microbiome composition across sample sites - oral swab, saliva and esophageal.

Within individual change in relative abundance of F nucleatum in oral samples

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 21 days

Population: Data was not collected and analyzed for F. Nucleatum in particular, instead an analysis was done for the microbiome composition across sample sites - oral swab, saliva and esophageal.

Comparison of relative abundance of esophageal F. nucleatum in the mouthwash group vs. the no intervention group.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Antibacterial Mouthwash

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

No Intervention

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Julian A Abrams, MD

Columbia University Medical Center

Phone: 2123059541

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place