Tolerability, Safety and Efficacy of Lubricin Versus Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops in Patients With Moderate Dry Eye

NCT ID: NCT02507934

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-26

Study Completion Date

2015-10-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to evaluate tolerability, safety and efficacy of Lubricin 150 µg/ml eye drops when compared to a widely used commercial 0.18% sodium hyaluronate eye drop formulation in moderate dry eye patients.

Primary objectives:

* Tolerability using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision, and photophobia;
* Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed throughout the clinical investigation.

Secondary objectives:

* Corneal fluorescein staining (scored using the Oxford scale);
* Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia);
* Symptom assessment in dry eye (SANDE);
* Ocular protection index (OPI);
* Tear film break-up time (TFBUT);
* Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA);
* Slit lamp examination (SLE) (Eyelid - Meibomian glands, eyelid erythema, eyelid oedema, lashes, conjunctiva erythema, lens, iris, anterior chamber, corneal transparency, corneal neovascularisation);
* Intraocular pressure (IOP);
* Number of instillations of investigational medical device during the second week of the clinical investigation.

All parameters will be evaluated at Screening visit-V1 (Day -7 up to day -5), baseline visit-V2 (Day 1), V3 (Day 7±1), V4 (Day 14±1) and at Final Visit follow-up-V5 (Day 21±1).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a 2 week, randomized, double-masked, controlled, parallel group and 1 week follow-up investigation to evaluate tolerability, safety and efficacy of Lubricin (150 µg/mL) eye drops versus sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% eye drops (Vismed®) in patients with moderate dry eye (DE).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The packaging used for the comparator in the present investigation aimed at ensuring a complete masking of the test IMD.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lubricin

Lubricin 150 μg/ml eye drops solution

Test investigational device was instilled b.i.d. (two times a day), one drop into each eye, from day 1 to day 7±1 and, then, from 2 to 6 times a day as needed (i.e. prn), one drop into each eye, from day 7±1 to day 14±1.

After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects used Vismed® 0.18% b.i.d. every 8±1 h, one drop into each eye, from day 14±1 to day 21±1.

Before the start of the treatment (from day -6/-4 to day -1), the subjects were allowed to use only Nebul®, NaCl 0.9% ocular solution q.i.d. every 4±1 h, one drop into each eye.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lubricin

Intervention Type DEVICE

Lubricin 150 µg/ml eye drops

Sodium Hyaluronate

Vismed®, 0.18% sodium hyaluronate eye drops

Comparator was instilled b.i.d. (two times a day), one drop into each eye, from day 1 to day 7±1 and, then, from 2 to 6 times a day as needed (i.e. prn), one drop into each eye, from day 7±1 to day 14±1.

After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects used Vismed® 0.18% b.i.d. every 8±1 h, one drop into each eye, from day 14±1 to day 21±1.

Before the start of the treatment (from day -6/-4 to day -1), the subjects were allowed to use only Nebul®, NaCl 0.9% ocular solution q.i.d. every 4±1 h, one drop into each eye.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sodium Hyaluronate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sodium hyaluronate 0.18% eye drops

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lubricin

Lubricin 150 µg/ml eye drops

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sodium Hyaluronate

Sodium hyaluronate 0.18% eye drops

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vismed®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To be checked at the screening visit (V1) within 7 days before study treatment and confirmed at baseline visit (V2):

1. Patients 18 years of age or older;
2. Patients with moderate dry eye characterized by at least one eye with signs and symptoms of moderate dry eye (grade 2 or 3 of the 2007 DEWS report);
3. Patients diagnosed with dry eye from at least 3 months (current use or recommended use of artificial tears for the treatment of Dry Eye);
4. Average VAS score for typical symptoms of Dry Eye (foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) ≥ 25 mm;
5. Corneal staining score with fluorescein \> 3 using the Oxford corneal grading system in the worst performing eye;
6. Schirmer test without anaesthesia ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes in the worst performing eye;
7. Tear film break-up time (TBUT) ≤ 10 seconds in the worst performing eye;
8. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score ≥ 0.1 decimal units in both eyes at the time of study enrollment;
9. Only patients who satisfy all Informed Consent requirements may be included in the study. The patient and/or his/her legal representative must read, sign and date the Informed Consent document before any study-related procedures are performed. The Informed Consent form signed by patients and/or legal representative must have been approved by the Ethics Committee for the current study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a mild Dry Eye condition (severity level 1 according to the Report of the International Dry Eye Workshop -DEWS, 2007);
2. Patients with a severe Dry Eye condition (severity level 4 according to the Report of the International Dry Eye Workshop -DEWS, 2007);
3. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score of \< 0.1 decimal units in either eye at the time of study enrolment;
4. Evidence of an active ocular infection in either eye;
5. History or presence of ocular surface disorders not related to dry eye in either eye;
6. Use of any ocular topical medication other than the study medications for the treatment of ocular diseases including artificial tears during the study period;
7. Use of topical cyclosporine, topical corticosteroids or any other topical medication for the treatment of dry eye in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment;
8. History of any ocular surgery (including laser or refractive surgical procedures) in either eye within the 90 days before study enrolment. Ocular surgery will not be allowed during the study treatment period and elective ocular surgery procedures should not be planned during the duration of the follow-up period;
9. Presence or history of any ocular or systemic disorder or condition that might significantly hinder the efficacy of the study treatment or its evaluation, could possibly interfere with the interpretation of study results, or could be judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study visit schedule or conduct of trail procedures (e.g. ocular trauma, progressive or degenerative corneal conditions, uveitis, systemic infection.);
10. Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications;
11. Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 90 days of screening/baseline visit;
12. History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction;
13. Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions:

* are currently pregnant or,
* have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Screening/Baseline Visit or,
* intend to become pregnant during the study treatment period or,
* are breast-feeding or,
* not willing to use highly effective birth control measures, such as: Hormonal contraceptives - oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected and/or mechanical barrier methods - spermicide in conjunction with a barrier such as a condom or diaphragm or an Intra Uterine Device during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Flavio Mantelli, MD-PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dompè farmaceutici SpA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dipartimento "Organi di Senso" Università La Sapienza- Policlinico Umberto I

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lambiase A, Sullivan BD, Schmidt TA, Sullivan DA, Jay GD, Truitt ER 3rd, Bruscolini A, Sacchetti M, Mantelli F. A Two-Week, Randomized, Double-masked Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Lubricin (150 mug/mL) Eye Drops Versus Sodium Hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% Eye Drops (Vismed(R)) in Patients with Moderate Dry Eye Disease. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jan;15(1):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27614318 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIV-15-05-013553

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LUB0115MD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.