York Study of Unloading Shoes for Vascular Intermittent Claudication

NCT ID: NCT02505503

Last Updated: 2016-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Some people experience a cramp-like leg pain during walking that is relieved only by rest. This is called intermittent claudication (IC) and it is a common symptom of peripheral arterial disease. Patients with IC struggle to walk, which in turn lowers their quality of life.

The intensity of IC pain experienced during walking depends on several factors, including the type of footwear worn. For example, non-supportive shoes may make the calf muscles work harder during walking, leading to earlier and more-severe symptoms of IC.

A member of the research team has developed a shoe that reduces the work done by the lower-leg muscles during walking. Preliminary data indicate that, when wearing these "unloading shoes", people with IC were able to walk further without pain as compared with when wearing a normal pair of shoes. The current project aims to provide further information on the usefulness and acceptability of these shoes.

Forty people with IC will complete a set of three walking tests on two separate occasions; once whilst wearing the unloading shoes, and once whilst wearing some normal shoes. The participants will then be given a pair of unloading or normal shoes to wear for two weeks, after which we will collect information on how acceptable the shoes were to wear via a survey of all participants and one-to-one interviews with a subset of participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study design This is a single-centre, randomised crossover study with a qualitative component. Forty patients will be recruited from York Hospital. Participants will be asked to perform walking assessments on two week days within a maximum period of two weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to complete walking assessments whilst wearing unloading shoes on day 1, followed by walking assessments whilst wearing control shoes on day 2, or vice versa. All participants will then be given the unloading or control shoes to wear for two weeks, after which they will complete a survey about how acceptable the shoes were to wear. A sub-sample of participants will also be interviewed about the acceptability of the shoes.

Study setting Recruitment for this study will take place at York Hospital, York, United Kingdom. Study assessments will take place at York St John University.

Unloading shoe The design of the "unloading" shoe to be used in this research will be a modern style of trainer-type shoe with a cosmetically-shaped rocker sole incorporated. The rocker sole will comprise of three circular curves whose arc centres are positioned at the anatomical ankle, hip and knee respectively; assuming a vertical lower limb. This is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion. This is in order to unload the calf muscles by providing a simultaneous reduction in ankle range of motion in relative plantarflexion but still moving with a near-normal trajectory. This also optimises the lever arm between the Achilles tendon and the ankle joint so making propulsion, and therefore calf muscle power generation, more efficient. Participants will be provided with a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which will be produced for this study by an established shoe manufacturer - Chaneco (www.chaneco.co.uk). To allow participants to habituate to wearing the shoes before assessment, they will be allowed to walk around in the shoes at a self-selected pace for at least 5 minutes.

Control shoe During the control condition assessments, participants will wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole. Again, these will be provided by Chaneco, and a minimum of 5 minutes walking will be allowed for habituation.

Outcome measures Primary outcome measure

• Maximum walking distance during forced-pace walking: Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will complete a 6-minute walk test in which they will be instructed to walk as far as possible within 6 minutes. This test simulates community walking better than treadmill testing, has been recommended as a primary outcome in claudication trials, and has good inter-day reproducibility (coefficient of variation 10.4%). A straight 30-m course will be used and the distance walked recorded. A testing checklist and standardised instructions will be used. The outcome assessor will have no role in the sizing and fitting of the shoes, in an attempt to keep them blinded, and the verbal test instructions will be audio-recorded so that we can check the consistency of which the instructions have been delivered.

Secondary outcome measures

* Pain-free walking distance during usual-pace walking: Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will be invited to walk at their usual walking speed along a straight 30-m course. Their walking speed will be recorded using electronic timing gates (SMARTSPEED, Fusion Sport). Participants will be instructed to indicate the point where they first experience claudication pain. The distance walked up until this point will be recorded.
* Gait biomechanical parameters: Reflective markers will be positioned on anatomical landmarks of the lower extremities using double-sided sticky tape to allow 3D motion analysis. Wireless surface electromyography units (Trigno EMG, Delsys, Italy) will also be attached to the skin overlying the medial and lateral Gastrocnemius and Tibialis Anterior using double-sided sticky tape to allow the assessment of lower-leg muscle recruitment patterns during the gait cycle. Participants will walk at their usual pace along a figure-of-8 circuit. A force plate (9281EA, Kistler) positioned in the central straight portion of the figure-of-8 will capture kinetic data. The participants will be naïve to the force plate, to help ensure a natural walking gait. Infra-red 3D optical motion analysis cameras (Oqus, Qualisys) will capture kinematic data each time a participant approaches and passes over the force plate. Participants will indicate when they experience the onset of claudication pain and continue until pain prevents them walking further. Outcomes include step length, stride length, cadence, velocity and joint angles, and joint moments and powers of the lower extremities during the three stages of pain development during walking; pain-free walking, after the onset of pain and immediately before stopping walking due to pain.

Participant timeline Participants will be required to attend the biomechanics laboratory at York St John University on 3 occasions: a first "screening" visit for obtaining written informed consent, confirming eligibility and recording baseline characteristics of the participant, and two subsequent visits on which the study assessments will be conducted. The study assessment sessions (i.e. visits 2 and 3) will be identical in composition apart from that the participants will wear different shoes (unloading or control) during the walking tests. The first assessment visit must be completed within 4 weeks of the screening visit, and there will be a maximum of 2 weeks and a minimum of 1 day between assessment visits 1 and 2. After completing the crossover study, half of the participants (n=20) will be given the unloading shoes and the other half (n=20) the control shoes to wear for 2 weeks. After this 2-week period, all participants will complete and return a survey about the shoes and be questioned via telephone about any adverse device effects. A sub-sample (minimum n=12; control n=6, unloading n=6) will undertake a telephone-based semi-structured interview with a qualitative researcher. This interview will be conducted within 2 weeks of the end of the 2 week shoe-wearing period. Therefore, the maximum duration that a participant will be involved in the study from the point of consenting is 10 weeks, and the minimum is 17 days; however, most participants will most likely be undertaking the study visits across a period of 4-8 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intermittent Claudication Peripheral Arterial Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unloading shoes

The unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a cosmetically-shaped rocker sole. The sole will have three circular curves whose arc centres are positioned at the anatomical ankle, hip and knee respectively; assuming a vertical lower limb. This is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Unloading shoes

Intervention Type DEVICE

The unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a rocker sole incorporated. The sole is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion.

Unadapted control shoe

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the control condition assessments, participants wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole.

Unadapted control shoes

The control shoes will be similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but they will not contain the altered sole.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Unloading shoes

Intervention Type DEVICE

The unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a rocker sole incorporated. The sole is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion.

Unadapted control shoe

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the control condition assessments, participants wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Unloading shoes

The unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a rocker sole incorporated. The sole is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Unadapted control shoe

During the control condition assessments, participants wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged ≥16 years with intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease
* Resting ankle-brachial index ≤0.9 and/or imaging evidence of peripheral arterial disease
* Stable symptoms for at least 3 months (assessed via self-report)
* Pain-free walking distance \<250 m on 6-minute walk test
* Ambulation that is limited primarily by calf claudication on 6-minute walk test
* Able to provide written informed consent
* Able to read and speak English

Exclusion Criteria

* Absolute contraindications to exercise testing as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine
* Critical limb ischemia
* Function is uniquely impaired, e.g. vascular amputees
* Co-morbidities that limit walking to a greater extent than intermittent claudication (e.g. severe arthritis)
* Ambulation limited by claudication in regions other than the calf
* Current or previous (within 6 months) use of shoe inserts, knee or ankle braces or customised shoes prescribed by a health professional
* Ankle/foot pathology/pain on either side
* "High-risk" foot (e.g. significant peripheral neuropathy, foot deformity, history of foot ulceration), assessed by a vascular specialist (Registrar or Consultant) or podiatrist
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of York

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

York St John University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Salford

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Garry Tew, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of York

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

York St John University

York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jordan AR, Tew GA, Hutchins SW, Shalan A, Cook L, Thompson A. Three-curve rocker-soled shoes and gait adaptations to intermittent claudication pain: A randomised crossover trial. Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30265963 (View on PubMed)

Tew GA, Shalan A, Jordan AR, Cook L, Coleman ES, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Hutchins SW, Thompson A. Unloading shoes for intermittent claudication: a randomised crossover trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0716-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29179693 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YOR - A02382

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.