Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cannabidiol Treatment in Patients With Early Psychosis (NCT NCT02504151)

NCT ID: NCT02504151

Last Updated: 2022-09-06

Results Overview

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale is a 30-item scale to assess both the positive and negative symptom symptoms of schizophrenia. The range total score is 30-210. An improvement in symptoms is reflected by a lower score.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

18 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Completed each time subject is seen over 10 weeks (screening, period 1 baseline, period 1 week 1, period 1 week 2, period 1 week 3, period 1 week 4, period 2 baseline, period 2 week 1, period 2 week 2, period 2 week 3, period 2 week 4)

Results posted on

2022-09-06

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
First Intervention (4 Weeks)
STARTED
8
10
First Intervention (4 Weeks)
COMPLETED
7
9
First Intervention (4 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
1
1
Washout (2 Weeks)
STARTED
7
9
Washout (2 Weeks)
COMPLETED
6
9
Washout (2 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
Second Intervention (4 Weeks)
STARTED
6
9
Second Intervention (4 Weeks)
COMPLETED
4
7
Second Intervention (4 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
2
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
First Intervention (4 Weeks)
Physician Decision
1
1
Washout (2 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
1
0
Second Intervention (4 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
0
1
Second Intervention (4 Weeks)
Physician Decision
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

Cannabidiol Treatment in Patients With Early Psychosis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 Participants
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 Participants
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
22.875 years
n=5 Participants
26.1 years
n=7 Participants
25 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
18 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Completed each time subject is seen over 10 weeks (screening, period 1 baseline, period 1 week 1, period 1 week 2, period 1 week 3, period 1 week 4, period 2 baseline, period 2 week 1, period 2 week 2, period 2 week 3, period 2 week 4)

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differ from the overall number analyzed to reflect the number of participants who completed the scale during each time point.

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale is a 30-item scale to assess both the positive and negative symptom symptoms of schizophrenia. The range total score is 30-210. An improvement in symptoms is reflected by a lower score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 Participants
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 Participants
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Baseline period 1
81.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.8
84.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.3
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 1 period 1
78.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.8
75.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.3
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 2 period 1
81.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.8
73.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.3
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 3 period 1
79.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.8
70.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.4
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 4 period 1
72.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.8
69.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.0
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Baseline period 2
71.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.4
68.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.4
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 1 period 2
75.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.4
67.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.5
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 2 period 2
72.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.4
70.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.5
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 3 period 2
73.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.4
69.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.6
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Over Time
Week 4 period 2
72.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.4
66.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.6

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Completed each time subject is seen over 10 weeks (screening, period 1 baseline, period 1 week 1, period 1 week 2, period 1 week 3, period 1 week 4, period 2 baseline, period 2 week 1, period 2 week 2, period 2 week 3, period 2 week 4)

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differ from the overall number analyzed to reflect the number of participants who completed the scale during each time point.

Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale score is a global rating of improvement scale, which requires subjects to rate their degree of improvement on a 7-point scale. The total range score is 1-7. A reduction in scores indicates improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 Participants
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 Participants
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 4 period 2
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Baseline period 1
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 1 period 1
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 2 period 1
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 3 period 1
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 4 period 1
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Baseline period 2
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 1 period 2
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 2 period 2
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale Over Time
Week 3 period 2
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Completed each time subject is seen over 10 weeks (screening, period 1 baseline, period 1 week 1, period 1 week 2, period 1 week 3, period 1 week 4, period 2 baseline, period 2 week 1, period 2 week 2, period 2 week 3, period 2 week 4)

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differ from the overall number analyzed to reflect the number of participants who completed the scale during each time point.

The PAOFI measures subjects' perceptions of functioning when performing everyday tasks and activities that reflect cognitive strengths and weaknesses. Subjects rate each item on a scale ranging from 0 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). The total score is the sum of the responses to each item (score of 0 to 160). High scores on the PAOFI subscales are indicative of poor perceived cognitive functioning. This scale was modified to remove 3 items- so the highest possible score is 145 for this outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 Participants
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 Participants
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 3 period 1
93.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 11.3
89.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.4
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 4 period 1
95.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 11.3
89.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.6
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Baseline period 1
90.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 11.3
85.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.4
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 1 period 1
85.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 11.3
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.4
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 2 period 1
95.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 11.3
74.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.4
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Baseline period 2
105.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 12.2
87.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.6
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 1 period 2
108.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 12.2
88.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.7
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 2 period 2
104.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 12.2
90.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.7
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 3 period 2
105.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 12.2
86.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.9
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) Over Time
Week 4 period 2
107.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 12.2
95.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 9.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Completed each time subject is seen over 10 weeks (screening, period 1 baseline, period 1 week 1, period 1 week 2, period 1 week 3, period 1 week 4, period 2 baseline, period 2 week 1, period 2 week 2, period 2 week 3, period 2 week 4)

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differ from the overall number analyzed to reflect the number of participants who completed the scale during each time point.

The Quality of Life Scale (QLS) is a 21-item scale rated from a semi structured interview, each item is rated 0-6. The specific descriptors vary among items, but the high end of the scales (scores of 5 and 6) reflects normal or unimpaired functioning, and the low end of the scales (scores of 0 and 1) reflects severe impairment of the function in question. A highest score of 126 would indicate unimpaired functioning.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 Participants
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 Participants
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Baseline period 1
70.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 7.7
72.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.4
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 1 period 1
73.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 7.7
74.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.4
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 2 period 1
69.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 7.7
67.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.4
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 3 period 1
69.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 7.7
71.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.4
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 4 period 1
72.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 7.7
70.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.5
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Baseline period 2
68.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.6
73.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.5
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 1 period 2
68.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.6
76.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.7
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 2 period 2
70.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.6
77.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.7
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 3 period 2
66.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.6
78.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.8
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Over Time
Week 4 period 2
71.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.6
82.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.8

Adverse Events

Cannabidiol, Then Placebo

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo, Then Cannabidiol

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 participants at risk
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
Psychiatric disorders
Hospitalization
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
The subject will receive treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a two week washout period, followed by four weeks of placebo. Period 1: CBD, 800 mg/day Period 2: Placebo
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
n=10 participants at risk
The subject will receive placebo for four weeks, followed by a 2 week washout period, followed by four weeks of treatment with Cannabidiol (CBD) (800 mg/day). Period 1: Placebo Period 2: CBD, 800 mg/day
General disorders
Dry mouth
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood, racing thoughts
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Reproductive system and breast disorders
ER Visit
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Tension headache
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Migraine
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Sedation
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Scratchy throat and cold symptoms
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Eye disorders
Stye in left eye
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right shin pain
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Contact dermatitis
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Increased itchiness of rash
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Increased tiredness
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in right forearm
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Veisalgia
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomitting
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
High blood pressure/hospitalization
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Insomnia
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Relapse to PCP, LSD, and opiate use
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal discomfort
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash around tattoo
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Sleeplessness
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pulled leg muscle
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach discomfort
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Tingling and numbness on right side to body and face
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Swollen left foot
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
Psychiatric disorders
Worsening of symptoms and more negative affect
0.00%
0/8 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Flu
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
General disorders
Sinusitis
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).
0.00%
0/10 • Adverse Events (AE) were reported at each visit through the duration of the study at 8 weeks.
AEs were collected by randomization arm, not by intervention method (order in the crossover).

Additional Information

Dr. Mohini Ranganathan

Yale

Phone: (203)932-5711

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place