Trial Outcomes & Findings for Reduced Exposure Study Using CHTP 1.0 During 5 Days in Confinement. (NCT NCT02503254)
NCT ID: NCT02503254
Last Updated: 2023-01-30
Results Overview
Concentrations measured on Day 5 in urine, adjusted for creatinine. Geometric Least Squares (LS) means are provided as descriptive statistics.
COMPLETED
NA
85 participants
5 days
2023-01-30
Participant Flow
Study initiated (first subject screened): 04 July 2015 At admission (Day -3), all the subjects performed a product trial of the CHTP 1.0. During the baseline period, they continued smoking their single preferred brand of CC. Then, on Day -1, subjects were randomized to one of the two study arms (CHTP 1.0 or CC) in a 1:1 ratio.
Enrolled and randomized population = 80 subjects * 41 subjects in CHTP 1.0 arm * 39 subjects in CC arm Number of subjects enrolled but NOT randomized (who tried the CHTP 1.0 at Day -3) = 5
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
41
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
41
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Reduced Exposure Study Using CHTP 1.0 During 5 Days in Confinement.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=41 Participants
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=39 Participants
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
Total
n=80 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.45 • n=5 Participants
|
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97 • n=7 Participants
|
33.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) nicotine level
≤ 0.6 mg
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) nicotine level
> 0.6 to ≤ 1 mg
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: The analysis was performed on the full analysis set (FAS) population. The FAS consisted of all the randomized subjects who had at least 1 post randomization product use experience (CHTP 1.0 or CC) and had at least 1 non-safety assessment.
Concentrations measured on Day 5 in urine, adjusted for creatinine. Geometric Least Squares (LS) means are provided as descriptive statistics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=41 Participants
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=39 Participants
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of Monohydroxybutenyl Mercapturic Acid (MHBMA)
|
327.08 pg/mg creat
Interval 282.39 to 378.84
|
1903.61 pg/mg creat
Interval 1637.48 to 2212.99
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: The analysis was performed on the full analysis set (FAS) population. The FAS consisted of all the randomized subjects who had at least 1 post randomization product use experience (CHTP 1.0 or CC) and had at least 1 non-safety assessment.
Concentrations measured on Day 5 in urine, adjusted for creatinine. Geometric Least Squares means are provided as descriptive statistics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=41 Participants
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=39 Participants
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of 3-hydroxypropylmercapturic Acid (3-HPMA)
|
464.27 ng/mg creat
Interval 432.13 to 498.8
|
1272.96 ng/mg creat
Interval 1182.66 to 1370.15
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: The analysis was performed on the full analysis set (FAS) population. The FAS consisted of all the randomized subjects who had at least 1 post randomization product use experience (CHTP 1.0 or CC) and had at least 1 non-safety assessment.
Concentrations measured on Day 5 in urine, adjusted for creatinine. Geometric Least Squares means are provided as descriptive statistics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=41 Participants
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=39 Participants
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of S-phenylmercapturic Acid (S-PMA)
|
352.39 pg/mg creat
Interval 321.26 to 386.54
|
2971.98 pg/mg creat
Interval 2703.14 to 3267.55
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: The analysis was performed on the full analysis set (FAS) population: all randomized subjects who had at least 1 post randomization product use experience (CHTP 1.0 or CC) and had at least 1 non-safety assessment. However, due to sample issues such as clotting, COHb assessment results could not be generated for some of the subjects.
% COHb blood measurements performed in the evening of Day 5, expressed as % of saturation of hemoglobin. Geometric Least Squares means are provided as descriptive statistics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=32 Participants
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=26 Participants
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Levels of Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)
|
2.660 percentage of saturation of hemoglobin
Interval 2.316 to 3.054
|
6.460 percentage of saturation of hemoglobin
Interval 5.531 to 7.544
|
Adverse Events
CHTP 1.0
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
Enrolled But Not Randomized
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=41 participants at risk
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=39 participants at risk
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
Enrolled But Not Randomized
n=5 participants at risk
Subjects who tried the CHTP 1.0 at Admission (Day -3) but were not randomized
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CHTP 1.0
n=41 participants at risk
Ad libitum use of the Carbon Heated Tobacco Product 1.0 (CHTP 1.0) for 5 days in confinement
|
Conventional Cigarette (CC)
n=39 participants at risk
Ad libitum use of subject's own preferred brand of CC for 5 days in confinement
|
Enrolled But Not Randomized
n=5 participants at risk
Subjects who tried the CHTP 1.0 at Admission (Day -3) but were not randomized
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
46.3%
19/41 • Number of events 21 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
23.1%
9/39 • Number of events 13 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
31.7%
13/41 • Number of events 17 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/5 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site haematoma
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
5.1%
2/39 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/5 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
5.1%
2/39 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
5.1%
2/39 • Number of events 2 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.00%
0/41 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
0.00%
0/39 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • From the informed consent form signature until the end of the safety follow-up period, up to 58 days (including a screening period of up to 42 days, a 9-day confinement period followed by a 7-day safety follow-up period (7 days after discharge of the subject or early discontinuation)).
The safety was assessed in the safety population, consisting of 85 subjects: 80 randomized subjects (41 in CHTP 1.0 and 39 in CC) and 5 subjects exposed to CHTP 1.0 during the product trial on Day -3 but not randomized.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee We confirm we have the contractual provisions in place which specifies that in no event will the study site be allowed to disclose to any third party (or publicly release) any information obtained through the study without the CRO's prior written consent which in turn cannot provide such consent without Sponsor's approval unless such publication is made to satisfy regulatory requirements. The Intellectual Property rights and research results from the present study belongs to the Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER