Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of a Fixed Pramlintide: Insulin Dose Ratio on Postprandial Glucose in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT02500979)
NCT ID: NCT02500979
Last Updated: 2018-11-02
Results Overview
24-hour MWG mg/dL, defined as total area under the 24-hour tissue glucose curve obtained with CGM, divided by actual time span in the 24-hour period.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
34 participants
24 h
2018-11-02
Participant Flow
The first subject was enrolled in the study (at Visit 2) on 27 August 2015. A total of 79 subjects were screened and 34 subjects were randomized at 3 sites in the United States. One additional subject was randomized in error and was discontinued prior to receiving any study medication. The last subject completed the study on 05 August 2016.
Eligible study subjects were males and females, aged ≥18 years and ≤70 years at the time of screening with a prior diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and an HbA1c value of ≥7.2% and ≤9.0% at screening.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pramlintide First, Then Placebo
(Treatment Sequence A)
|
Placebo First, Then Pramlintide
(Treatment Sequence B)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
STARTED
|
16
|
17
|
|
Period 1
COMPLETED
|
12
|
16
|
|
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
1
|
|
Period 2
STARTED
|
12
|
16
|
|
Period 2
COMPLETED
|
11
|
16
|
|
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pramlintide First, Then Placebo
(Treatment Sequence A)
|
Placebo First, Then Pramlintide
(Treatment Sequence B)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
Hyperglycemia
|
1
|
0
|
|
Period 1
Severe non-compliance to protocol
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period 1
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Period 1
Subject decision
|
2
|
0
|
|
Period 2
Change in risk
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pramlintide First, Then Placebo
n=16 Participants
(Treatment Sequence A) - Safety Analysis Set
|
Placebo First, Then Pramlintide
n=16 Participants
(Treatment Sequence B) - Safety Analysis Set
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Current Administration of Insulin
MDI
|
4 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
5 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
9 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
14 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
16 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
30 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.83 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
38.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
42.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.92 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
12 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
25 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
4 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
7 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
14 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
30 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
1 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
15 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
15 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
30 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Weight
|
72.03 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.012 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
68.73 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.859 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
70.38 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.949 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Height
|
168.41 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.966 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
167.31 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.684 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
167.86 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.236 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
25.38 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.806 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
24.52 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.341 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
24.95 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.579 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Duration of Diabetes
|
27.81 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.177 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
21.94 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.866 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
24.88 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.249 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Current Administration of Insulin
CSII
|
10 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
11 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
21 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Current Administration of Insulin
Both
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Renal Status Category
<30 mL/min
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Renal Status Category
≥30 to <60 mL/min
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Renal Status Category
≥60 to <90 mL/min
|
8 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
8 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
16 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Renal Status Category
≥90 mL/min
|
6 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
8 Participants
n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
14 Participants
n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Baseline Fasting Glucose
|
8.57 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.767 • n=15 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
8.15 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.149 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
8.35 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.928 • n=31 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Baseline A1c
|
7.84 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.356 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
8.21 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.574 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
8.03 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.506 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Baseline C-peptide
|
0.030 nmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0 • n=1 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0.030 nmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0141 • n=2 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
0.030 nmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0100 • n=3 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
|
Baseline Insulin
|
38.14 U/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.525 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
36.58 U/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.920 • n=16 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
37.36 U/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.725 • n=32 Participants • Safety Analysis Set: All randomized subjects receiving any infused study treatment. Subjects were analyzed according to the treatment sequence they received.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hPopulation: Full Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) had at least 1 efficacy assessment available from each of the 2 crossover periods and were included in the Full Analysis Set.
24-hour MWG mg/dL, defined as total area under the 24-hour tissue glucose curve obtained with CGM, divided by actual time span in the 24-hour period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of 24-hour Tissue Mean Weighted Glucose (MWG) Obtained With Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
|
173.8 mg/dL
Standard Error 8.17
|
152.2 mg/dL
Standard Error 8.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Absolute postprandial plasma glucose AUC was measured for the first 3 hours (AUC0-3h) following lunch based on sample availability. (Sample times: 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=25 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=24 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Absolute Plasma Glucose Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Following Lunch
|
36.233 mmol/L*h
Interval 31.427 to 41.039
|
28.336 mmol/L*h
Interval 23.487 to 33.185
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Absolute postprandial plasma glucose AUC (AUC0-2h) was measured for the first 2 hours following dinner based on sample availability. (Sample times: 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=25 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Absolute Plasma Glucose Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Following Dinner
|
23.247 mmol/L*h
Interval 20.472 to 26.021
|
17.970 mmol/L*h
Interval 15.231 to 20.709
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Absolute postprandial plasma glucose AUC (AUC0-2h) was measured for the first 2 hours following breakfast based on sample availability. (Sample times: 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=24 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Absolute Plasma Glucose Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Following Breakfast
|
23.535 mmol/L*h
Interval 20.817 to 26.253
|
19.101 mmol/L*h
Interval 16.28 to 21.922
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hPopulation: Full Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) had at least 1 efficacy assessment available from each of the 2 crossover periods and were included in the Full Analysis Set,
Incremental (i.e., baseline-corrected) area under the 24-hour tissue glucose concentration curve (AUC0-24h) measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with a pre-test, non-fasting tissue glucose value as baseline. (Sample times: 0, 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Incremental 24-hour Tissue Glucose Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Obtained With Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
|
26243 mg/dL*min
Standard Error 3379.8
|
-2489 mg/dL*min
Standard Error 3379.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Absolute mean area under the 24-hour plasma glucose concentration curve, measured as total area under the curve (0 to 24 hours). (Sample times: 0, 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Absolute 24-hour Plasma Glucose Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
|
243.835 mmol/L*h
Interval 220.032 to 267.638
|
215.417 mmol/L*h
Interval 191.614 to 239.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Incremental (i.e., baseline-corrected) mean area under the 24-hour plasma glucose concentration curve, measured as total area under the curve (0 to 24 hours). (Sample times: 0, 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Incremental 24-hour Plasma Glucose Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
|
11.181 mmol/L*h
Standard Deviation 67.6648
|
-12.753 mmol/L*h
Standard Deviation 70.0174
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hPopulation: Full Analysis Set:Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) had at least 1 efficacy assessment available from each of the 2 crossover periods and were included in the Full Analysis Set.
Percent time spent in the normoglycemic range of tissue glucose concentrations between \>70 mg/dL and \<180 mg/dL, measured by CGM. (Sample times: 0, 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide Measured by Percent Time Spent in the Range of >70 mg/dL to <180 mg/dL Tissue Glucose Obtained With Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
|
43.8 Percentage of time
Interval 33.6 to 56.9
|
57.2 Percentage of time
Interval 44.0 to 74.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Absolute mean area under the 24-hour plasma glucagon concentration curve, measured as total area under the curve (total AUC0-24). (Sample times: 0, 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Absolute 24-hour Plasma Glucagon Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
|
506.265 h*pmol/L
Interval 459.096 to 558.28
|
481.633 h*pmol/L
Interval 436.759 to 531.118
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Incremental (i.e., baseline-corrected) mean area under the 24-hour plasma glucagon concentration curve with a pre-test, non-fasting plasma glucagon value as baseline. (Sample times: 0, 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 20 hours 45 min, 21 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Pramlintide by Measurement of Incremental 24-hour Plasma Glucagon Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
|
-14.954 pmol/L*h
Standard Deviation 58.9024
|
-16.055 pmol/L*h
Standard Deviation 69.2684
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 hours after dinner mealPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Fasting plasma glucose concentration at 0600 hours (6:00 AM)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentration
|
7.794 mmol/L
Interval 6.631 to 9.162
|
8.459 mmol/L
Interval 7.196 to 9.943
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Mean areas under the plasma insulin concentration curves for the 24-hour periods of pramlintide and placebo administration (Sample times: -15 min, 0, 30 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 15 min, 2 hours 30 min, 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 15 min, 16 hours 30 min, 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 19 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of Insulin as Demonstrated by 24-hour Plasma Insulin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
|
380.525 mU/L*h
Standard Deviation 178.2360
|
377.324 mU/L*h
Standard Deviation 176.7569
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Mean values of the average plasma insulin concentrations over the 24-hour periods of pramlintide and placebo administration. (Sample times: -15 min, 0, 30 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 15 min, 2 hours 30 min, 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 15 min, 16 hours 30 min, 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 19 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of Insulin as Demonstrated by 24-hour Average Plasma Insulin Concentration.
|
15.855 mIU/L
Standard Deviation 7.4265
|
15.722 mIU/L
Standard Deviation 7.3649
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Mean maximum plasma insulin concentrations over the 24-hour periods of pramlintide and placebo administration. (Sample times: -15 min, 0, 30 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 15 min, 2 hours 30 min, 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 15 min, 16 hours 30 min, 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 19 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of Insulin as Demonstrated by Maximum Plasma Insulin Concentration
|
33.144 mIU/L
Standard Deviation 17.0950
|
32.838 mIU/L
Standard Deviation 16.2315
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis Set: Of the 33 correctly randomized subjects, 26 (76.5%) subjects received at least 1 dose of pramlintide and had evaluable PD data and were, therefore, included in the PK/PD Analysis Set.
Mean time to maximum plasma insulin concentrations over the 24-hour periods of pramlintide and placebo administration. (Sample times: -15 min, 0, 30 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours \[dinner\], 2 hours 15 min, 2 hours 30 min, 2 hours 45 min, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 16 hours \[breakfast\], 16 hours 15 min, 16 hours 30 min, 16 hours 45 min, 17 hours, 18 hours, 19 hours, 20 hours \[lunch\], 24 hours).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=26 Participants
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of Insulin as Demonstrated by the Time to the Maximum Plasma Insulin Concentration
|
10.556 h
Standard Deviation 7.3466
|
11.653 h
Standard Deviation 7.6175
|
Adverse Events
Placebo & Regular Insulin
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo & Regular Insulin
n=28 participants at risk
Placebo was similar sterile solution without pramlintide
|
Pramlintide & Regular Insulin
n=32 participants at risk
Pramlintide was administered by sc infusion at a concentration of 1000ug/ml
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
14.3%
4/28 • Number of events 4 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
18.8%
6/32 • Number of events 6 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
43.8%
14/32 • Number of events 14 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous Detachment
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 4 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 3 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
25.0%
8/32 • Number of events 9 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Irritability
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity reaction
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus allergic
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Scab
|
0.00%
0/28 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Over two 24-hour treatment periods with a 2-week washout period between periods.
This was a crossover study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place