First-in-man Study of Titanium-Nitride Coated Woven-nitinol Peripheral Arterial Stent

NCT ID: NCT02499510

Last Updated: 2019-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The GoldenFlow (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is a novel woven-nitinol stent designed to have superior radial strength, flexibility and durability compared to standard nitinol stents for femoropopliteal lesions. This is a first-in-man study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GoldenFlow woven-nitinol stent for intraluminal treatment of peripheral vascular disease in the femoropopliteal arteries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endovascular treatment in femoropopliteal segment is the most challenging area due to restenosis and stent fracture after endovascular treatment. The titanium-nitride coated woven-nitinol peripheral arterial stent system (GoldenFlow, Lifetech Science, Shenzhen, China) is designed to have superior radial strength, flexibility and durability to withstand the compression, torsion, bending, lengthening and shortening found in femoropopliteal disease. Compared to another commercially available woven-nitinol stent, the GoldenFlow stent has the potential advantage to be repositionable and is less likely to lengthen during deployment. This is a first-in-man study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GoldenFlow woven-nitinol stent for intraluminal treatment of peripheral vascular disease in de-novo femoropopliteal lesions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GoldenFlow stent

Titanium nitrite coated woven nitinol stent

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GoldenFlow Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

The GoldenFlow stent (Lifetech Science, Shenzhen, China) is a TiN coated self-expanding stent consisting of interwoven nitinol wires braided in a closed cell design. Stents used in this study ranged from 4-12mm in diameter and 20-160mm in length.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GoldenFlow Stent

The GoldenFlow stent (Lifetech Science, Shenzhen, China) is a TiN coated self-expanding stent consisting of interwoven nitinol wires braided in a closed cell design. Stents used in this study ranged from 4-12mm in diameter and 20-160mm in length.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Titanium-nitride coated GoldenFlow woven-nitinol stent

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥18 years
2. Symptomatic leg ischemia (Rutherford class 2 to 4)
3. Ankle Brachial Index \<0.9
4. De novo femoropopliteal stenosis (≥70%) or occlusion
5. Reference diameter 4 and 7mm
6. Lesion length 4 to 15cm
7. At least one patent (\<50% stenosis) infrapopliteal run-off vessel
8. The lesion(s) can be successfully crossed with a guidewire and dilated
9. Patients with bilateral femoropopliteal disease is eligible for enrollment into the study

\- Staged contralateral limb procedure can be performed \>30 days after index procedure
10. Able to provide written informed consent and willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluation schedule

Exclusion Criteria

1. Tissue loss or gangrene (Rutherford class 5 and 6)
2. Previous bypass surgery or stenting in target vessel
3. Untreated aortoiliac or common femoral artery inflow disease \>50%
4. Intervention of ipsilateral lesions during the index procedure or staged intervention within 30 days after index procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Professor Bryan Ping Yen YAN

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bryan Ping Yen Yan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prince of Wales Hospital

Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000 Jan;31(1 Pt 2):S1-S296. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10666287 (View on PubMed)

Johnston KW. Femoral and popliteal arteries: reanalysis of results of balloon angioplasty. Radiology. 1992 Jun;183(3):767-71. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1294068.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1294068 (View on PubMed)

Minar E, Pokrajac B, Maca T, Ahmadi R, Fellner C, Mittlbock M, Seitz W, Wolfram R, Potter R. Endovascular brachytherapy for prophylaxis of restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty : results of a prospective randomized study. Circulation. 2000 Nov 28;102(22):2694-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.22.2694.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11094034 (View on PubMed)

Capek P, McLean GK, Berkowitz HD. Femoropopliteal angioplasty. Factors influencing long-term success. Circulation. 1991 Feb;83(2 Suppl):I70-80.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1825050 (View on PubMed)

Henry M, Amor M, Beyar R, Henry I, Porte JM, Mentre B, Tricoche O, Ethevenot G. Clinical experience with a new nitinol self-expanding stent in peripheral arteries. J Endovasc Surg. 1996 Nov;3(4):369-79. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)0032.0.CO;2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8959493 (View on PubMed)

Cejna M, Thurnher S, Illiasch H, Horvath W, Waldenberger P, Hornik K, Lammer J. PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Jan;12(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61397-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11200349 (View on PubMed)

Vroegindeweij D, Vos LD, Tielbeek AV, Buth J, vd Bosch HC. Balloon angioplasty combined with primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in femoropopliteal obstructions: A comparative randomized study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;20(6):420-5. doi: 10.1007/s002709900186.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9354709 (View on PubMed)

Grimm J, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, Hilbert C, Brossmann J, Heller M. Randomized study to compare PTA alone versus PTA with Palmaz stent placement for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):935-42. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61572-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11487673 (View on PubMed)

Zdanowski Z, Albrechtsson U, Lundin A, Jonung T, Ribbe E, Thorne J, Norgren L. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting for femoropopliteal occlusions? A randomized controlled study. Int Angiol. 1999 Dec;18(4):251-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10811511 (View on PubMed)

Becquemin JP, Favre JP, Marzelle J, Nemoz C, Corsin C, Leizorovicz A. Systematic versus selective stent placement after superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):487-94. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.155.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12618680 (View on PubMed)

Schillinger M, Minar E. Endovascular stent implantation for treatment of peripheral artery disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007 Mar;37(3):165-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01774.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17359483 (View on PubMed)

Tetteroo E, van der Graaf Y, Bosch JL, van Engelen AD, Hunink MG, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Lancet. 1998 Apr 18;351(9110):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)09508-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9643685 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Not_applicable

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gangwon PCI Prospective Registry
NCT02038127 RECRUITING