Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol for Interstitial Cystitis (NCT NCT02497976)
NCT ID: NCT02497976
Last Updated: 2018-05-17
Results Overview
Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
42 participants
Week 2
2018-05-17
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited from my practice, web site, and Urology clinic at UCSD from December 10, 2015 through March 1, 2017.
There were 3 patients who did not meet screening criteria. Twenty-four patients had sufficient improvement in their IC/BPS symptoms and did not continue with the drug versus placebo phase of the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
28
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Moved out of area
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol for Interstitial Cystitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol
n=28 Participants
Experimental drug certolizumab pegol 400mg.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Normal saline
|
Total
n=42 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=5 Participants
|
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
|
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
28 Count of participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Count of participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Count of participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
O'Leary Sant Symptom and Problem Index
|
26.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=5 Participants
|
26.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=7 Participants
|
26.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 10, 18Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Week 4
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Week 10
|
12 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Week 18
|
15 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Value at Weeks 2, 4, 10 and 18 minus BaselineThe Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index is one of the two O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indexes. This scale has a 0 if the patient has no symptoms and a maximum of 19 with severe symptoms. Lubeck et al. validated ICSI as a valid measure of change in treatment outcome studies. A change of -4.03 in the ICSI score was the same as a 2 point improvement in GRA. Propert et al. validated the ICSI as responsive to change in IC/BPS symptoms and was recommended as secondary endpoints in clinical trials. A change of -2.4 in the ICSI score was the same as a 2 point improvement in GRA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 2
|
-1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 4
|
-3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 10
|
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
-2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 18
|
-5.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Value of Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baselineThe Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICPI) is one of the two O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indexes. This scale has a 0 if the patient has no symptoms and a maximum of 16 with severe symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 2
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 4
|
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 10
|
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 18
|
-4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
-1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Value at Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baselinean 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale. Subjects rated their average pain, pressure, or discomfort associated with their bladder using an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale of 0-no pain to 10-worse ever pain at baseline, and at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Meaningful, clinically important pain relief is a reduction in pain of approximately 30% from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Scale
Week 2
|
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Pain Scale
Week 4
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Pain Scale
Week 10
|
-2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Pain Scale
Week 18
|
-2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Value of Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baselineSubjects rated their average urinary urgency or need to urinate using an 11-point numerical rating scale of 0-no urgency to 10-worse ever urgency
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Urgency Scale
Week 2
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Urgency Scale
Week 4
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Urgency Scale
Week 10
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Urgency Scale
Week 18
|
-2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
Adverse Events
Group 1: Experimental
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 participants at risk
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8
Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
|
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 participants at risk
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8
Placebo: Normal saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
urinary infection
|
25.0%
7/28 • Number of events 7 • From screening to last visit at 18 weeks for a total of at least 22 weeks
|
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 4 • From screening to last visit at 18 weeks for a total of at least 22 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place