Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol for Interstitial Cystitis (NCT NCT02497976)

NCT ID: NCT02497976

Last Updated: 2018-05-17

Results Overview

Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

42 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 2

Results posted on

2018-05-17

Participant Flow

Patients were recruited from my practice, web site, and Urology clinic at UCSD from December 10, 2015 through March 1, 2017.

There were 3 patients who did not meet screening criteria. Twenty-four patients had sufficient improvement in their IC/BPS symptoms and did not continue with the drug versus placebo phase of the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
Overall Study
STARTED
28
14
Overall Study
COMPLETED
26
13
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2
0
Overall Study
Moved out of area
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol for Interstitial Cystitis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Certolizumab Pegol
n=28 Participants
Experimental drug certolizumab pegol 400mg.
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Normal saline
Total
n=42 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=5 Participants
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 Count of participants
n=5 Participants
14 Count of participants
n=7 Participants
42 Count of participants
n=5 Participants
O'Leary Sant Symptom and Problem Index
26.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=5 Participants
26.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=7 Participants
26.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 2

Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
2 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 10, 18

Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Week 4
8 Participants
3 Participants
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Week 10
12 Participants
3 Participants
IC/BPS Symptoms Change With Overall Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Week 18
15 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Value at Weeks 2, 4, 10 and 18 minus Baseline

The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index is one of the two O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indexes. This scale has a 0 if the patient has no symptoms and a maximum of 19 with severe symptoms. Lubeck et al. validated ICSI as a valid measure of change in treatment outcome studies. A change of -4.03 in the ICSI score was the same as a 2 point improvement in GRA. Propert et al. validated the ICSI as responsive to change in IC/BPS symptoms and was recommended as secondary endpoints in clinical trials. A change of -2.4 in the ICSI score was the same as a 2 point improvement in GRA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 2
-1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 4
-3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 10
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
-2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
Week 18
-5.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Value of Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baseline

The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICPI) is one of the two O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indexes. This scale has a 0 if the patient has no symptoms and a maximum of 16 with severe symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 2
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 4
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 10
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
IC/BPS Symptoms Assessment With the Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI)
Week 18
-4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
-1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Value at Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baseline

an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale. Subjects rated their average pain, pressure, or discomfort associated with their bladder using an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale of 0-no pain to 10-worse ever pain at baseline, and at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Meaningful, clinically important pain relief is a reduction in pain of approximately 30% from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
Pain Scale
Week 2
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
Pain Scale
Week 4
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
Pain Scale
Week 10
-2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
Pain Scale
Week 18
-2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Value of Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baseline

Subjects rated their average urinary urgency or need to urinate using an 11-point numerical rating scale of 0-no urgency to 10-worse ever urgency

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 Participants
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 Participants
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
Urgency Scale
Week 2
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
Urgency Scale
Week 4
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
Urgency Scale
Week 10
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
Urgency Scale
Week 18
-2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6

Adverse Events

Group 1: Experimental

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 2: Placebo Comparator

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Group 1: Experimental
n=28 participants at risk
Biological: Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg loading dose given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, and 4 followed by a maintenance dose at week 8 Certolizumab pegol: 400 mg
Group 2: Placebo Comparator
n=14 participants at risk
Placebo: given subcutaneously at week 0, 2, 4, and week 8 Placebo: Normal saline
Infections and infestations
urinary infection
25.0%
7/28 • Number of events 7 • From screening to last visit at 18 weeks for a total of at least 22 weeks
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 4 • From screening to last visit at 18 weeks for a total of at least 22 weeks

Additional Information

Philip C. Bosch, MD

IC Study LLC

Phone: 760 743-3135

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place