Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Pivotal Study to Assess the InSpace™ Device for Treatment of Full Thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears (NCT NCT02493660)
NCT ID: NCT02493660
Last Updated: 2022-06-15
Results Overview
The primary composite effectiveness endpoint was defined as achievement of improvement for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) score (≥275 points) and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score (≥6.4 points) by week 6 and maintenance at month 12 without subsequent secondary surgical intervention (SSSI) or serious adverse device effects (SADEs). The improvement of points of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) of at least 275 (point scale of 0-2100:lower score is better) and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) at least 6.4 (point scale of 0-100:higher score is better) reflect the required number of points in improvement for treatment to be considered successful.
COMPLETED
NA
184 participants
Baseline to month 12
2022-06-15
Participant Flow
Subjects assessed for eligibility n=229
Subjects excluded (n=45) for various reasons, not meeting criteria (n=11), declined to participate (n=12), and Other (n=22) such as, no medical clearance for surgery, intra-op screen failures, enrollment full.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
Arthroscopic InSpace (Sub-acromial tissue spacer system) implantation
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
93
|
91
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
83
|
79
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
Arthroscopic InSpace (Sub-acromial tissue spacer system) implantation
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Subject unable to return for follow-up visits
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Pivotal Study to Assess the InSpace™ Device for Treatment of Full Thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=93 Participants
Arthroscopic InSpace (Sub-acromial tissue spacer system) implantation
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=91 Participants
Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
Total
n=184 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
102 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
66.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.70 • n=5 Participants
|
64.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.88 • n=7 Participants
|
65.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.84 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
180 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
78 participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 participants
n=7 Participants
|
156 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to month 12Population: Percentage of participants in the Per Protocol Population (PP) with surgical treatment success of the InSpace device as a Primary surgical treatment for Full-thickness massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT).
The primary composite effectiveness endpoint was defined as achievement of improvement for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) score (≥275 points) and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score (≥6.4 points) by week 6 and maintenance at month 12 without subsequent secondary surgical intervention (SSSI) or serious adverse device effects (SADEs). The improvement of points of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) of at least 275 (point scale of 0-2100:lower score is better) and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) at least 6.4 (point scale of 0-100:higher score is better) reflect the required number of points in improvement for treatment to be considered successful.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=88 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=88 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in the Per Protocol Population With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears From Baseline to Month 12 With no SSSIs and no SADEs.
|
51.1 percentage of participants
|
39.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through to Month 24Population: Per Protocol Population with no major protocol deviations.
Composite Endpoint Per Protocol Population (PP) of WORC Improvement ≥ 275 and ASES Improvement ≥ 6.4 from baseline at Week 6 Maintained at Month 24 with no Subsequent Secondary Surgical Intervention (SSSI) and no Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADEs) (pre-specified).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=82 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=79 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Endpoint of WORC Improvement ≥275 and ASES Improvement ≥6.4 at Week 6 Maintained at Month 24 no Subsequent Secondary Surgical Intervention (SSSI) and no Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADEs) (Pre-specified). Composite WORC ASES and Safety to M24
|
46.3 percentage of participants
Interval 35.5 to 57.1
|
38.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.0 to 49.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to month 12Population: Per Protocol Population
The secondary effectiveness endpoint was defined as a composite component-level success at Month 12 for Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) total score improvement (≥275) (scale of 0-2100:lower score is better) in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair without subsequent secondary surgical intervention (SSSI) or serious adverse device effects (SADEs).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=88 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=88 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Endpoint Component Level Success for WORC at Month 12 Compared to Baseline in the Per Protocol Population (PP)
|
89.8 percentage of participants
|
87.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to month 12Population: Per Protocol Population
The secondary endpoint was defined as a composite component-level success for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ( ASES) compared at baseline to Month 12 without subsequent secondary surgical intervention (SSSI) or serious adverse device effects (SADEs).. The total score improvement of (≥ 6.4 points) (scale of 0-100:higher score is better) from baseline in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=88 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=88 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Endpoint Component Level Success for ASES at Month 12 Compared to Baseline in the Per Protocol Population (PP)
|
96.3 percentage of participants
|
90.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through to month 24Population: The Intent To Treat (ITT) population with available data.
The secondary effectiveness endpoint was defined as mean change from baseline to Month 24 for Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) total score improvement (≥275) (scale of 0-2100:lower score is better) in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=83 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=78 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Intent To Treat (ITT) Population With Available Data With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Through to Month 24. WORC
|
-1083.37 score on a scale
Interval -1199.94 to -966.81
|
-1007.00 score on a scale
Interval -1108.34 to -905.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through to month 24Population: Intent To Treat (ITT) Population with available data
Mean change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score from baseline to month 24. The improvement of points of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) at least 6.4 (point scale of 0-100:higher score is better) reflect the required number of points in improvement for treatment to be considered successful.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=83 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=79 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Intent To Treat (ITT) Population With Available Data With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Through to Month 24. ASES
|
46.22 score on a scale
Interval 41.66 to 50.79
|
42.53 score on a scale
Interval 37.96 to 47.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to month 24Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population with available data
The secondary effectiveness endpoint was defined as mean change from baseline to Month 24 for Constant-Murley (CS) Shoulder Outcome score (where the scale of 0-100:higher score is better) in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=83 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=79 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 for Constant-Murley (CS) in the Intent To Treat Population (ITT) With Available Data With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
|
28.22 score on a scale
Interval 23.92 to 32.51
|
21.81 score on a scale
Interval 16.99 to 26.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through to month 24Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population with available data
The secondary effectiveness endpoint was defined as change in baseline to Month 24 for Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) (scale of 0-100: lower score better) in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=83 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=78 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 for EQ-5D-5L for Intent To Treat (ITT) Population With Available Data With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
|
-4.65 score on a scale
Interval -5.36 to -3.94
|
-4.00 score on a scale
Interval -4.61 to -3.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through to month 24Population: Intent To Treat (ITT) Population with available data
The secondary effectiveness endpoint was defined as the mean change from baseline at Month 24 for Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (scale of 0-100:lower score is better) in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=83 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=78 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 for VAS in the Intent To Treat (ITT) Population With Available Data With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
|
-56.55 score on a scale
Interval -61.78 to -51.32
|
-54.55 score on a scale
Interval -59.92 to -49.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through to month 24Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population with available data
The secondary effectiveness endpoint was defined as mean change from baseline at Month 24 for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) range of motion (ROM)-physician reported portion. (scale of 0-180 Degrees: higher score is better) in the two groups, InSpace and Partial Repair.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=82 Participants
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=77 Participants
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 for ASES ROM in the Intent To Treat (ITT) Population With Available Data With Surgical Treatment Success of the InSpace Device as a Primary Surgical Treatment for Full-thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
|
36.89 score on a scale
Interval 28.02 to 45.76
|
18.16 score on a scale
Interval 9.33 to 26.98
|
Adverse Events
InSpace Implantation
Tendon Repair
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=93 participants at risk
Arthroscopic InSpace (Sub-acromial tissue spacer system) implantation
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=91 participants at risk
Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
eg. Pain or inflammation
|
10.8%
10/93 • Number of events 11 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
12.1%
11/91 • Number of events 12 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
eg. dizziness, Aphasia, Cerebrovascular accident
|
4.3%
4/93 • Number of events 6 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
2.2%
2/91 • Number of events 3 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
eg.Prostate cancer, leukemia, Parathyroid tumor
|
3.2%
3/93 • Number of events 4 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
4.4%
4/91 • Number of events 4 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
eg. Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease
|
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
0.00%
0/91 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
eg.Laryngeal granuloma, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary mass
|
3.2%
3/93 • Number of events 3 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
eg. Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, short-bowel syndrome, small intestinal obstruction
|
2.2%
2/93 • Number of events 4 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
0.00%
0/91 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
General disorders
eg. Event leading to Death, non-cardiac chest pain, surgical failure
|
0.00%
0/93 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
3.3%
3/91 • Number of events 3 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina Pectoris (Chest pain-Cardiac)
|
0.00%
0/93 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
0.00%
0/91 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
0.00%
0/91 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
InSpace Implantation
n=93 participants at risk
Arthroscopic InSpace (Sub-acromial tissue spacer system) implantation
InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system: Arthroscopic implantation of InSpace sub-acromial tissue spacer system
|
Tendon Repair
n=91 participants at risk
Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
Partial repair of rotator cuff: Arthroscopic partial repair of rotator cuff
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain, Arthralgia, back pain (anywhere in body)
|
54.8%
51/93 • Number of events 96 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
52.7%
48/91 • Number of events 71 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall and injury, meniscus injury, Tendon rupture (anywhere in body)
|
14.0%
13/93 • Number of events 18 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
24.2%
22/91 • Number of events 23 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Infections and infestations
UTI, Bronchitis, pneumonia
|
17.2%
16/93 • Number of events 23 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
12.1%
11/91 • Number of events 13 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache, dizziness
|
10.8%
10/93 • Number of events 14 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
11.0%
10/91 • Number of events 12 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
General disorders
Pain, Local swelling
|
10.8%
10/93 • Number of events 12 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
5.5%
5/91 • Number of events 5 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
6.5%
6/93 • Number of events 10 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
6.6%
6/91 • Number of events 6 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
7.5%
7/93 • Number of events 8 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
4.4%
4/91 • Number of events 4 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
2.2%
2/93 • Number of events 2 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
2.2%
2/93 • Number of events 2 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
0.00%
0/91 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pre-Ventricular Contractions
|
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
0.00%
0/91 • Collected over 12 months and 24 months visit.
The All-Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Event, and Adverse events are listed for the safety population and some subjects reported more than one AE or SAE.
|
Additional Information
Colleen Roden, Director, Clinical Operations
Stryker Company
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period of 45 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and can only extend the embargo with patent protection review.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER