Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of Priming of Questionnaire Content on Grip Strength in Patients With Hand and Upper Extremity Illness (NCT NCT02493127)

NCT ID: NCT02493127

Last Updated: 2017-04-13

Results Overview

The pain catastrophizing scale is a 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a lower score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

122 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

enrollment

Results posted on

2017-04-13

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Standard PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Overall Study
STARTED
61
61
Overall Study
COMPLETED
60
60
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Standard PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
1

Baseline Characteristics

The Effect of Priming of Questionnaire Content on Grip Strength in Patients With Hand and Upper Extremity Illness

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Standard PCS
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=5 Participants
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=7 Participants
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
57 Participants
n=7 Participants
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants
n=5 Participants
60 participants
n=7 Participants
120 participants
n=5 Participants
Grip Strength affected hand
Mean grip strength
52 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24 • n=5 Participants
62 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32 • n=7 Participants
57 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28 • n=5 Participants
Grip Strength affected hand
Maximum grip strength
56 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25 • n=5 Participants
66 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32 • n=7 Participants
60 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29 • n=5 Participants
Grip Strength of non-affected hand
Mean grip strength
67 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28 • n=5 Participants
75 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32 • n=7 Participants
71 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 • n=5 Participants
Grip Strength of non-affected hand
Maximum grip strength
72 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 • n=5 Participants
79 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=7 Participants
76 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=5 Participants
Grip strength of both hands
Mean grip strength
59 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23 • n=5 Participants
68 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 • n=7 Participants
68 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 • n=5 Participants
Grip strength of both hands
Maximum grip strength
73 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28 • n=5 Participants
81 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=7 Participants
78 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: enrollment

The pain catastrophizing scale is a 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a lower score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
8.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: enrollment

The positive pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is a positively-phrased 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a higher score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Positive Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
36.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Difference in Grip strength of the non-affected hand after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times on the non-affected hand at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Mean grip strength
0.31 pounds
Standard Deviation 5.3
2.2 pounds
Standard Deviation 5.1
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Maximum grip strength
-0.77 pounds
Standard Deviation 7.2
1.8 pounds
Standard Deviation 6.6

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Difference in Grip strength of the injured hand after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times on the injured hand at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Mean grip strength
1.3 pounds
Standard Deviation 4.3
3.9 pounds
Standard Deviation 6.2
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Maximum grip strength
-0.17 pounds
Standard Deviation 5.4
4.0 pounds
Standard Deviation 7.3

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Difference in Grip strength of both hands after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times with both hands at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS Standard PCS: Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Positive PCS
n=60 Participants
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS Grip Strength: Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements Positively Adjusted PCS: Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Mean grip strength
0.71 pounds
Standard Deviation 4.1
3.1 pounds
Standard Deviation 4.5
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Maximum grip strength
-1.2 pounds
Standard Deviation 6.9
2.7 pounds
Standard Deviation 6.5

Adverse Events

Standard PCS

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Positive PCS

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Taylor Pong, Research Coordinator

Massachusetts General Hospital

Phone: 617-726-1569

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place