Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-31
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The clinical hypothesis of this trial is that pediatric patients who undergo a local anesthetic pre-incisional and/or post-incisional will reduce the amount of postoperative pain and therefore reduce the amount of analgesics required to keep the patient satisfied.
Primary: To determine if local anesthetic reduces postoperative pain. Secondary: To assess the timing of local anesthetic injection affects postoperative pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Pain Relief Between Two Methods of Freezing Injections in Children Having Their Appendix Removed
NCT06945263
Nebulized Analgesia for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Trial
NCT02624089
Lidocaine VS Hemodynamic, Metabolic and Hormonal Response
NCT05238506
Magnesium Sulfate in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT06563349
Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Management of Post Thoracotomy Pain
NCT04258436
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The subjects will be approached preoperatively and will be divided into three groups: pre-incisional injection of local anesthetic, post-incisional injection of local anesthetic, and (pre or post) injection of saline as the control.
All patients will have a standard 3 port laparoscopic appendectomy, port placement, port and instrument type, and operative technique will be determined by the surgeon's usual practice.
On induction, the following protocol will be utilized: a 2 mg/kg bolus of propofol, 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine, 0.1 mg/kg of morphine, and 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium. A standardized anesthetic, using a mixture of sevoflurane in oxygen and air, will be utilized. Once the appendectomy is complete, a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg of ketorolac will be given prior to extubation. A total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine or saline, up to a maximum of 30 cc, will be injected using a 22g needle. Pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure.
The subjects will be assessed for postoperative pain immediately upon wakening, and then 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the LA procedure by the bedside nurse by using the VAS and by measuring the total amount of opioid use.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Saline
Patient will be given saline with a maximum of 30 cc either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Pre-Incisional Saline
Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle to area of incision.
Post-Closure Saline
Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle after closing sutures were made.
Local
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Pre Incisional Local Anesthetic
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Post-Closure Local Anesthetic
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pre Incisional Local Anesthetic
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Pre-Incisional Saline
Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle to area of incision.
Post-Closure Local Anesthetic
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Post-Closure Saline
Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle after closing sutures were made.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
9 Years
17 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Valley Anesthesiology Consultants
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Neil Raj Singhal
Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.
Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Edwards TJ, Carty SJ, Carr AS, Lambert AW. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy: a randomised controlled trial: Time to stop using local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy? Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):314-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.012. Epub 2011 Feb 13.
Kang H, Kim BG. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2010 May-Jun;38(3):821-32. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800309.
Liu Y, Seipel C, Lopez ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML, Fallon SC, Manyang PA, Tjia IM, Baijal RG, Watcha MF. A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/pan.12271. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011. Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1074-7.
Oravsky M, Bak V, Schnorrer M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2014;115(10):660-2. doi: 10.4149/bll_2014_127.
Palmes D, Rottgermann S, Classen C, Haier J, Horstmann R. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of intraperitoneal local anaesthesia on pain after laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):824-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5810.
Reynolds SL, Jaffe DM. Diagnosing abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1992 Jun;8(3):126-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199206000-00003.
Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP, Dittus RS. Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):680-5.
Thanapal MR, Tata MD, Tan AJ, Subramaniam T, Tong JM, Palayan K, Rampal S, Gurunathan R. Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia: an effective method in immediate post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):47-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06210.x. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Tomecka MJ, Bortsov AV, Miller NR, Solano N, Narron J, McNaull PP, Ricketts KJ, Lupa CM, McLean SA. Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0.
Wright JE. Controlled trial of wound infiltration with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg. 1993 Jan;80(1):110-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800136.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-047
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.