Evaluation of Local Anesthetic at Incision Site

NCT ID: NCT02483689

Last Updated: 2018-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient will have usual appendectomy surgery with an injection of local or saline at incision site either before or after the incision at random.

The clinical hypothesis of this trial is that pediatric patients who undergo a local anesthetic pre-incisional and/or post-incisional will reduce the amount of postoperative pain and therefore reduce the amount of analgesics required to keep the patient satisfied.

Primary: To determine if local anesthetic reduces postoperative pain. Secondary: To assess the timing of local anesthetic injection affects postoperative pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized-controlled pilot study of 100 pediatric subjects, recruited through Phoenix Children's Hospital and Pediatric Surgeons of Phoenix, who will undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute non-perforated appendicitis. The reviewer and subject will be blind to the treatment to help prevent bias. The subjects will be randomized by envelope using a random number generator, and the infiltrated solution will be given to the surgeon by the pharmacy.

The subjects will be approached preoperatively and will be divided into three groups: pre-incisional injection of local anesthetic, post-incisional injection of local anesthetic, and (pre or post) injection of saline as the control.

All patients will have a standard 3 port laparoscopic appendectomy, port placement, port and instrument type, and operative technique will be determined by the surgeon's usual practice.

On induction, the following protocol will be utilized: a 2 mg/kg bolus of propofol, 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine, 0.1 mg/kg of morphine, and 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium. A standardized anesthetic, using a mixture of sevoflurane in oxygen and air, will be utilized. Once the appendectomy is complete, a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg of ketorolac will be given prior to extubation. A total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine or saline, up to a maximum of 30 cc, will be injected using a 22g needle. Pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure.

The subjects will be assessed for postoperative pain immediately upon wakening, and then 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the LA procedure by the bedside nurse by using the VAS and by measuring the total amount of opioid use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Saline

Patient will be given saline with a maximum of 30 cc either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Pre-Incisional Saline

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle to area of incision.

Post-Closure Saline

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle after closing sutures were made.

Local

Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pre Incisional Local Anesthetic

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

Post-Closure Local Anesthetic

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pre Incisional Local Anesthetic

Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

Intervention Type DRUG

Pre-Incisional Saline

Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle to area of incision.

Intervention Type OTHER

Post-Closure Local Anesthetic

Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

Intervention Type DRUG

Post-Closure Saline

Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle after closing sutures were made.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bupivicaine Bupivicaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing Appendectomy for acute non-perforated appendicitis Must be between 9-17 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* n/a
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Valley Anesthesiology Consultants

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Neil Raj Singhal

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix Children's Hospital

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Raj Singhal, MD

Role: CONTACT

Vanessa Pohl, BS

Role: CONTACT

6029334482

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Raj Singhal, M.D.

Role: primary

602-933-4482

Vanessa Pohl, B.S.

Role: backup

6029334482

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2239906 (View on PubMed)

Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22099604 (View on PubMed)

Edwards TJ, Carty SJ, Carr AS, Lambert AW. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy: a randomised controlled trial: Time to stop using local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy? Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):314-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.012. Epub 2011 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21324384 (View on PubMed)

Kang H, Kim BG. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2010 May-Jun;38(3):821-32. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800309.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20819419 (View on PubMed)

Liu Y, Seipel C, Lopez ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML, Fallon SC, Manyang PA, Tjia IM, Baijal RG, Watcha MF. A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/pan.12271. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24112856 (View on PubMed)

Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011. Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1074-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25264663 (View on PubMed)

Oravsky M, Bak V, Schnorrer M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2014;115(10):660-2. doi: 10.4149/bll_2014_127.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25573735 (View on PubMed)

Palmes D, Rottgermann S, Classen C, Haier J, Horstmann R. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of intraperitoneal local anaesthesia on pain after laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):824-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5810.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17571296 (View on PubMed)

Reynolds SL, Jaffe DM. Diagnosing abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1992 Jun;8(3):126-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199206000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1614900 (View on PubMed)

Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP, Dittus RS. Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):680-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8885946 (View on PubMed)

Thanapal MR, Tata MD, Tan AJ, Subramaniam T, Tong JM, Palayan K, Rampal S, Gurunathan R. Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia: an effective method in immediate post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):47-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06210.x. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23057502 (View on PubMed)

Tomecka MJ, Bortsov AV, Miller NR, Solano N, Narron J, McNaull PP, Ricketts KJ, Lupa CM, McLean SA. Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21958060 (View on PubMed)

Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6656869 (View on PubMed)

Wright JE. Controlled trial of wound infiltration with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg. 1993 Jan;80(1):110-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800136.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8428267 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-047

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.