Lumbar Discectomy Control Study, Risk Factors for Reherniation
NCT ID: NCT02477176
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-02-17
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety And Performance Of Disc Care To Prevent Lumbar Disc Herniation Recurrence
NCT06023719
Open Discectomy Versus Microscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT04112485
Study of Lumbar Discectomy With Annular Closure
NCT03986580
Full-Endoscopic vs Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Herniated Disc
NCT02441959
Preoperative Estimation Of Disc Herniation Recurrence In Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT04254250
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Small annular defect group
Patients with lumbar defect less than 6mm wide after lumbar discectomy
Discectomy
Lumbar discectomy
Large annular defect group
Patients with lumbar defect greater than 6mm wide after lumbar discectomy
Discectomy
Lumbar discectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Discectomy
Lumbar discectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with posterior or posterolateral disc herniations at one level between L1 and S1 with radiographic confirmation of neural compression using MRI. \[Note: Intraoperatively, only patients with an annular defect (post discectomy) between 4mm and 6mm tall and 6mm and 10mm wide shall qualify.\]
3. Radiculopathy (with or without back pain) with a positive Straight Leg Raise (0 - 60 degrees)22 (L45, L5S1) or Femoral Stretch Test (L12, L23, L34)
4. Oswestry Questionnaire score of at least 40/100 at baseline.
5. VAS leg pain (one or both legs) of at least 40/100 at baseline.
6. Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with the clinical protocol and willing to adhere to follow-up schedule and requirements.
7. Minimum posterior disc height of 5mm at the index level.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject requires spinal surgery other than a discectomy (with or without laminotomy) to treat leg/back pain (scar tissue and osteophyte removal is allowed).
3. Subject has back or non-radicular leg pain of unknown etiology.
4. Prior surgery at the index lumbar vertebral level.
5. Subject requiring a spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (i.e., patients with SCORE of ≥ 6) with a T Score less than -2.0 at the index level. For patients with a herniation at L5/S1, the average T score of L1-L4 shall be used.
6. Subject has clinically compromised vertebral bodies in the lumbosacral region due to any traumatic, neoplastic, metabolic, or infectious pathology.
7. Subject has sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebra or multiple fractures of the vertebra or hip.
8. Subject has scoliosis of greater than ten (10) degrees (both angular and rotational).
9. Any metabolic bone disease.
10. Subject has an active infection either systemic or local.
11. Subject has cauda equine syndrome or neurogenic bowel/bladder dysfunction.
12. Subject has severe arterial insufficiency of the legs or other peripheral vascular disease. (Screening on physical examination for patients with diminution or absence of dorsalis pedis or posterior tibialis pulses. If diminished or absent by palpation, then an arterial ultrasound is required with vascular plethysmography. If the absolute arterial pressure is below 50mm of Hg at the calf or ankle level, then the patient is to be excluded.)
13. Subject has significant peripheral neuropathy, patient defined as a patient with Type I or Type II diabetes or similar systemic metabolic condition causing decreased sensation in a stocking-like or non-radicular and non-dermatomal distribution in the lower extremities.
14. Subject has insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
15. Subject is morbidly obese (defined as a body mass index \>40, or weighs more than 100 lbs over ideal body weight).
16. Subject has been diagnosed with active hepatitis, AIDS, or HIV.
17. Subject has been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease.
18. Subject has active tuberculosis or has had tuberculosis in the past three (3) years.
19. Subject has a history of active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless he/she has been treated with curative intent and there have been no signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least two (2) years.
20. Subject is immunologically suppressed, received steroids \>1 month over the past year.
21. Currently taking anticoagulants, other than aspirin, unless the patient can be taken off the anticoagulant for surgery.
22. Subject has a current chemical/alcohol dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance.
23. Subject has a life expectancy of less than three (3) years.
24. Subject is currently involved in active spinal litigation.
25. Subject is currently involved in another investigational study.
26. Subject is incarcerated.
27. Patients will be divided into two arms (small- and large-defect) based on the width of their annular defect as measured intra-operatively. Patients with defects \<6mm in width will be in the "small defect" arm; patients with defects ≥6mm in width will be in the "large defect" arm. Each arm will be capped at 50 patients. Once 50 patients are accrued in one arm, subsequent patients who meet the criteria for that arm will be excluded. Enrollment will continue until both arms are filled.
21 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Intrinsic Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David H Kim, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
New England Baptist Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Orthopaedic Specialists Of The Four States
Galena, Kansas, United States
Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Michigan Orthopedic Specialists
Dearborn, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
US CONTROL-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.