Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT ID: NCT02471651

Last Updated: 2019-02-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-10-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laser photocoagulation and intravitreal anti-vascular growth factor injections are commonly used treatment options for individuals with diabetic macular edema. However, some patients continue to experience persistent diabetic macular edema and poor vision despite continued laser and/or anti-vegf therapy. Recent clinical trials suggest that due to inflammatory mediators dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7mg) may be a good alternative therapy for individuals unresponsive to laser photocoagulation or intravitreal anti-vascular growth factor injections. The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of using a dexamethasone steroid implant versus monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for research participants with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Macular edema is a major cause of central vision loss in patients presenting with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic macular edema (DME) occurs when fluid leaks into the center of the macula, the part of the eye where sharp, straight-ahead vision occurs. The fluid makes the macula swell, blurring vision. Diabetic macular edema (DME) affects between 8% to 10% of 23.6 million diabetic individuals in the United States. The prevalence of diabetic macular edema after 15 years of known diabetes is approximately 20% in patients with type 1 diabetes, 25% in patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking insulin, and 14% in patients with type 2 diabetes who do not take insulin. Within two years of diagnosis, nearly half of individuals with DME will lose 2 or more lines of visual acuity (the smallest line you can read on a standardized vision chart held 20 feet away).

Diabetic macular edema is typically treated with laser and/or intravitreal injections of drugs such as anti-VEGF agents. Anti-VEGF agents block a protein that slows the growth of the abnormal blood vessels. Dexamethasone is a corticosteroid used to treat inflammation. Dexamethasone implant is a steroid implant injected into the eye to treat swelling that may occur when there is a blockage of certain blood vessels in your eyes. Both anti-VEGF agents and dexamethasone implant are approved by the FDA to treat DME.

The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of using a dexamethasone steroid implant versus monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for research participants with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Implant

Subjects randomized to dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7mg) will receive the initial treatment at Month 3 (visit 4) and Month 6 (visit 7) and are eligible to receive one additional dose at Month 9 (visit 10), Month 10 (visit 11) or Month 11 (visit 12) for persistent or recurrent macular edema documented on SDOCT. If dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7mg) is administered at Month 10 (visit 11) or Month 11 (visit 12) an additional safety study visit will be required at one to two months following Month 12 (visit 13). The investigator can withhold treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7mg) beginning at Month 9 if there is complete resolution of diabetic macular edema document on SDOCT.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7 mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects with persistent DME who are randomized to this arm may get up to 3 treatments with the implant (0.7 mg dexamethasone).

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection

Subjects randomized to continue on anti-vegf therapy will receive intravitreal anti-vegf injections at Month 3 (visit 4) Month 4 (visit 5) and Month 5 (visit 6). Beginning at Month 6 (visit 7), subjects who have received 6 intravitreal anti-vegf injections and continue to present with persistent diabetic macular edema defined as less than 10% reduction or any increase in CST compared to baseline values and CST is greater than 300 microns, will receive dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7mg) at Month 6 (visit 7) and Month 9 (visit 10). The follow-up period for all subjects will continue through 12 months from the baseline study visit.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection

Intervention Type DRUG

This injection may be ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7 mg)

Subjects with persistent DME who are randomized to this arm may get up to 3 treatments with the implant (0.7 mg dexamethasone).

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection

This injection may be ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ozurdex ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study.
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)

* Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
* Current regular use of insulin for treatment of diabetes
* Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agent for the treatment of diabetes
* Clinical evidence of retinal thickening due to macular edema involving the center of the macula associated with diabetic retinopathy.
* Previous history of anti-vegf treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) with documented incomplete resolution of central subfield thickening by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). At least 4 intravitreal anti-vegf injections within the past six months prior to the baseline study visit are required for eligibility.
* Central diabetic macular edema present on clinical examination and SDOCT testing with central 1 mm subfield thickness greater than 300 microns as measured on SDOCT at the baseline visit.
* Visual acuity score greater than or equal to 19 letters (20/400) and less than or equal to 74 letters (20/32) by the ETDRS visual acuity protocol.
* Media clarity, pupillary dilation and patient cooperation sufficient to allow SDOCT testing and retinal photography.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or known to be pregnant; also pre-menopausal women not using adequate contraception.
* Participation in another ocular investigation or trial simultaneously
* Blood pressure \> 180/110 mmHg (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110 mmHg)
* Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g. chronic alcoholism, drug abuse)
* Evidence of vitreoretinal interface abnormality after ocular exam or OCT that may be contributing to the macular edema
* An eye that, in the investigator's opinion, has no chance of improving in visual acuity following resolution of macular edema (e.g. presence of subretinal fibrosis or geographic atrophy)
* Presence of another ocular condition that may affect the visual acuity or macular edema during the course of the study (e.g. AMD, uveitis, Irvine-Gass)
* Evidence of active neovascularization of the iris or retina
* Evidence of central atrophy or fibrosis in the study eye
* Presence of substantial cataract, one that might decrease the vision by 3 or more lines of vision at sometime during the study.
* History of vitreous surgery in the study eye
* History of cataract surgery within 3 months of enrollment.
* History of YAG capsulotomy within 2 months of enrollment.
* Visual acuity \<20/400 on ETDRS visual acuity charts in the fellow eye
* Uncontrolled glaucoma (pressure \> 30 mmHg) despite treatment with glaucoma medications.
* History of cerebral vascular accident or myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to Day 0.
* Use of systemic steroids (eg, oral, intravenous, intramuscular, epidural, rectal, or extensive dermal) within one month prior to the baseline study visit
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Allergan

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

California Retina Consultants

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabriel Gordon, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

California Retina Consultants

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

California Retina Consultants

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

California Retina Consultants

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

California Retina Consultants

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

California Retina Consultants

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chakravarthy H, Devanathan V. Molecular Mechanisms Mediating Diabetic Retinal Neurodegeneration: Potential Research Avenues and Therapeutic Targets. J Mol Neurosci. 2018 Nov;66(3):445-461. doi: 10.1007/s12031-018-1188-x. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30293228 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRC2015-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.