Trial Outcomes & Findings for ASD Parent Trainer: Online Coaching for Parents of Children With Autism (NCT NCT02469870)
NCT ID: NCT02469870
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Results Overview
Examining change over time points (T2-T1) This 25-item parent-report version of a behavioral screening questionnaire has been used with children aged 3 to 16 years of age. It assesses both positive and negative behaviors in the following domains: conduct problems, inattention-hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, peer problems, and pro-social behavior. The SDQ-P has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and is available in Spanish (Goodman, 2001).Total range of scores is from 0 to 50. The prosocial items are reverse scored for the total scale so that on the total scale higher scores indicate worse behaviors.
COMPLETED
NA
156 participants
Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)
2020-02-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition.
Practiced Routines was a facilitated program. It was organized into four modules that included a total of seven videos ranging from 3-13 minutes each. The topics overlapped with those in the TR program, but included more explicit information on function-based strategies, as well as mindfulness practice. Participants were assigned six fillable forms, and provided supplemental data collection tools. Additional resources focused on mindfulness and PBS within family routines. Eighteen brief guided audio meditations were available to participants via the Practiced MindTM mobile application. The meditations focused on bringing the parents' awareness to both internal and external experiences and helping them act intentionally.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
77
|
79
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
73
|
72
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
ASD Parent Trainer: Online Coaching for Parents of Children With Autism
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. Practiced Routines was a facilitated program. It was organized into four modules that included a total of seven videos ranging from 3-13 minutes each. The topics overlapped with those in the TR program, but included more explicit information on function-based strategies, as well as mindfulness practice. Participants were assigned six fillable forms, and provided supplemental data collection tools. Additional resources focused on mindfulness and PBS within family routines. Eighteen brief guided audio meditations were available to participants via the Practiced MindTM mobile application. The meditations focused on bringing the parents' awareness to both internal and external experiences and helping them act intentionally.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
Total
n=156 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=5 Participants
|
36.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=7 Participants
|
36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
77 participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 participants
n=7 Participants
|
156 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)Examining change over time points (T2-T1) This 25-item parent-report version of a behavioral screening questionnaire has been used with children aged 3 to 16 years of age. It assesses both positive and negative behaviors in the following domains: conduct problems, inattention-hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, peer problems, and pro-social behavior. The SDQ-P has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and is available in Spanish (Goodman, 2001).Total range of scores is from 0 to 50. The prosocial items are reverse scored for the total scale so that on the total scale higher scores indicate worse behaviors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. This group will receive Google Hangouts training on autism and lifestyle coaching.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 1997)
|
19.27 total score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
21.00 total score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)Examining change over time points (T2-T1) Quality of Life was measured using the Family Quality of Life survey (FQOL; Summers et al., 2005), which is a 25-item measure of the quality of life for a family raising a child with intellectual or developmental disabilities. The outcomes measured are: quality of life in the domains of parenting, emotional well-being, physical/material well-being, and disability-related supports using a 5-point scale with responses ranging from (1) very dissatisfied to (5) very satisfied. The average score on the total scale was used in the analysis. The range is from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more positive outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. This group will receive Google Hangouts training on autism and lifestyle coaching.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Family Quality of Life as Measured by Family Quality of Life Survey (Summers et al., 2005)
|
3.99 average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .5
|
3.86 average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks),Examining change over time points (T2-T1) Parenting Practices will be assessed using the Parenting Scale (PS; Arnold, O'Leary, Wolff, \& Aker, 1993) a 30-item, 7 point Likert-like scale with three subscales (laxness, over-reactivity, and hostility). The scale has internal consistency for the total scale and subscales (α = .78 and - .83 respectively) and has been evaluated for factor structure and validity (Rhoades \& O'Leary, 2007). The average score on the total scale was used in the analysis with a range of 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating more positive outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. This group will receive Google Hangouts training on autism and lifestyle coaching.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parenting Scale (Arnold, O'Leary, Wolff, & Aker, 1993)
|
3.7 average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .6
|
3.72 average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)Examining change over time points (T2-T1) The SBI-R is a 40-item, 7-point scale that measures 14 areas of adaptive behaviors and 8 areas of maladaptive behaviors. We used the total adaptive scale with a total range of 0 to 120 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. This group will receive Google Hangouts training on autism and lifestyle coaching.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R; Bruininks, Woodcock, Weatherman, & Hill, 1996)
|
65.56 total score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
63.87 total score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)Examining change over time points (T2-T1) 20 multiple choice knowledge items were developed during the project and were used to determine the extent to which participants understood basic program content, e.g., techniques parents can use to help their child master self-care routines. These included questions about the principles of behavior support (gathering information, evaluating possible reinforcers, etc.), definitions of behavioral concepts (tantrums, reinforcement, antecedent), and application of these concepts. The total score ranged from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. This group will receive Google Hangouts training on autism and lifestyle coaching.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge About Applied Behavior Analysis and Acceptance Commitment Training Measured by Questionnaire
|
14.52 total correct answers
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
13.37 total correct answers
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Follow up (6 weeks)A 16-item scale was developed to evaluate parents' views of the feasibility, usability, and personal relevance of the program. It asked about the information taught in the program, the trainers, the website, and the other materials. The average score on these 19 items was evaluated and ranged from 1 to 6 with higher scores indicating more positive outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
n=77 Participants
Autism Parent Trainer (APT) Experimental Condition. This group will receive Google Hangouts training on autism and lifestyle coaching.
|
Teaching Routines (Control)
n=79 Participants
Teaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire
|
5.50 average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .67
|
5.24 average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .88
|
Adverse Events
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
Teaching Routines (Control)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place