Trial Outcomes & Findings for Proof of Concept Study Comparing FX006 to Kenalog®-40 in Patients With Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee (NCT NCT02468583)
NCT ID: NCT02468583
Last Updated: 2024-01-24
Results Overview
The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine."
TERMINATED
PHASE2
6 participants
5-10 Weeks
2024-01-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
FX006 32 mg
3 subjects received FX006 32 mg as a single 5 mL IA injection
|
TCA IR 40 mg
3 subjects received TCA IR 40 mg as a single 1 mL IA injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Proof of Concept Study Comparing FX006 to Kenalog®-40 in Patients With Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
FX006 32 mg
n=3 Participants
FX006: Single 5 mL IA injection
|
TCA IR 40 mg
n=3 Participants
TCA IR: Single 1 mL IA injection
|
Total
n=6 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43 years
n=5 Participants
|
40 years
n=7 Participants
|
42 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5-10 WeeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine."
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
The pain intensity score is measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine."
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 average change from Baseline over Weeks 4 to 8 and Weeks 4 to 12
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 average change from Baseline over Weeks 4 to 8 and Weeks 4 to 12
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 average change from Baseline over Weeks 4 to 8 and Weeks 4 to 12
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 average change from Baseline over Weeks 4 to 8 and Weeks 4 to 12
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 average change from Baseline over Weeks 4 to 8 and Weeks 4 to 12
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 average change from Baseline over Weeks 4 to 8 and Weeks 4 to 12
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to >30% improvementPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Time to onset of pain relief in days is defined as the time from first dose to the first daily pain assessment showing \>30% improvement from the weekly mean of the average daily (24-hr) pain intensity scores at Baseline
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Given that the study was closed early, with only 5% of the planned study population enrolled, efficacy data were not analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
FX006 32 mg
TCA IR 40 mg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
FX006 32 mg
n=3 participants at risk
FX006: Single 5 mL IA injection
|
TCA IR 40 mg
n=3 participants at risk
TCA IR: Single 3 mL IA injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
66.7%
2/3 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Infection
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected following IA administration through the final study visit at week 12.
|
Additional Information
Scott Kelley, VP of Medical Affairs
Flexion Therapeutics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place