Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess the Clinical Utility of Antipsychotic Medication Levels in Plasma as Determined by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (NCT NCT02462473)

NCT ID: NCT02462473

Last Updated: 2017-03-29

Results Overview

Information on MTMs derived from data collected in the clinical assessment of the schizophrenia patient (CASP) questionnaire. The CASP captured changes in medications, changes in psychosocial treatments, visit frequency, and the need for any acute interventions. The CASP comprised of 3 sections covering several parameters. The CASP captured changes in treatment options which was used to compute MTM, as well as factors in clinical decision making and the influence of antipsychotic medication plasma levels (AMPL), when they were available, on clinical decision making.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

9 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to Week 12

Results posted on

2017-03-29

Participant Flow

The study had a planned enrollment of approximately 155 participants into 3 cohorts. However a total of 9 participants were enrolled and analyzed for efficacy and safety assessments in Cohort 1 and no participants were enrolled into Cohorts 2 or 3 of the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cohort 1
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
9
Overall Study
COMPLETED
5
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Cohort 1
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Overall Study
Death
1
Overall Study
Other
3

Baseline Characteristics

A Study to Assess the Clinical Utility of Antipsychotic Medication Levels in Plasma as Determined by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
Age, Continuous
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.15 • n=93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=93 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint.

Information on MTMs derived from data collected in the clinical assessment of the schizophrenia patient (CASP) questionnaire. The CASP captured changes in medications, changes in psychosocial treatments, visit frequency, and the need for any acute interventions. The CASP comprised of 3 sections covering several parameters. The CASP captured changes in treatment options which was used to compute MTM, as well as factors in clinical decision making and the influence of antipsychotic medication plasma levels (AMPL), when they were available, on clinical decision making.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=8 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Medication Treatment Modifications (MTM)
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. One participant (Participant 4) was not analyzed at Week 12 due to discontinuation caused by death.

Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) rating scale used to rate the severity of a participant's overall clinical condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (not ill) to 7 (extremely severe). Due to early study termination collected data was not summarized. Hence, individual data for each participant was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 0)
4 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 12)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 0)
4 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 12)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 0)
4 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 12)
4 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 4 (Week 0)
5 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 0)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 12)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 0)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 12)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 0)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 12)
4 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 0)
4 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 12)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 12)
3 units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 0)
3 units on a scale

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. One participant (Participant 4) was not analyzed at Week 12 due to discontinuation caused by death.

The DPSS is a clinician-rated scale used to rate 8 domains commonly seen in patients with psychotic disorders. Each domain was rated on a 5-point scale (0 to 4) with anchored description of endpoints. Total score was computed by summing the scores of individual items (range of 0-32). Higher scores represent more severe condition. Due to early study termination collected data was not summarized. Hence, individual data for each participant was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 0)
12 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 12)
4 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 0)
8 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 12)
2 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 0)
8 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 12)
8 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 4 (Week 0)
14 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 0)
9 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 12)
4 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 12)
4 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 0)
5 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 12)
8 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 0)
4 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 12)
4 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 0)
4 units on a scale
Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity Scale (DPSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 12)
6 units on a scale

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: AMPL analysis set included all enrolled participants who had AMPL data for at least 1 visit. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint.

AMPL of the individual participant during the active assessment phase was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=8 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 1- ARIPIPRAZOLE
596.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 1- DEHYDROARIPIPRAZOLE
139.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 2- OLANZAPINE
27.30 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 2- PALIPERIDONE
45.10 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 3- 7-OH QUETIAPINE
43.10 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 3-NORQUETIAPINE
660.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 3-QUETIAPINE
280.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 3-QUETIAPINE SULFOXIDE
660.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 5-7-OH QUETIAPINE
7.72 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 5-NORQUETIAPINE
153.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 5-QUETIAPINE
50.30 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 5-QUETIAPINE SULFOXIDE
321.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 6-ARIPIPRAZOLE
464.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 6-DEHYDROARIPIPRAZOLE
112.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 7-PALIPERIDONE
31.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 7-RISPERIDONE
26.20 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 9- PALIPERIDONE
0.100 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 9- QUETIAPINE
2.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 9- QUETIAPINE SULFOXIDE
2.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 9- RISPERIDONE
0.100 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 8-ARIPIPRAZOLE
168.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 8-DEHYDROARIPIPRAZOLE
33.00 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 9- 7-OH QUETIAPINE
0.200 nanogram per milliliter
Antipsychotic Medication Plasma Levels (AMPL) During the Active Assessment Phase at Week 12
Participant 9- NORQUETIAPINE
2.00 nanogram per milliliter

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint.

The CASP and data on concomitant medications and psychosocial treatments were used to evaluate the impact of AMPL results on other aspects of clinical decision making.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=6 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Factors Considered in Clinical Decision as Assessed by Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP)
Side Effects Of Medication
3 participants
Number of Participants With Factors Considered in Clinical Decision as Assessed by Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP)
Attitude Toward Treatment
2 participants
Number of Participants With Factors Considered in Clinical Decision as Assessed by Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP)
Report of Increased Symptoms
4 participants
Number of Participants With Factors Considered in Clinical Decision as Assessed by Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP)
Report of Decrease in Symptoms
3 participants
Number of Participants With Factors Considered in Clinical Decision as Assessed by Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP)
Patient Still Symptomatic
1 participants
Number of Participants With Factors Considered in Clinical Decision as Assessed by Clinical Assessment of the Schizophrenia Patient (CASP)
Patient Ideation
1 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. One participant (Participant 4) was not analyzed at Week 12 due to discontinuation caused by death.

The CRS is an ordinal scale filled by the clinician. The scores range from 1 to 7 that were used to quantify the clinician's assessment of treatment adherence by the patient. Higher scores indicate greater adherence. Due to early study termination collected data was not summarized. Hence, individual data for each participant was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 4 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 12)
7 units on a scale
Clinician's Rating Scale of Adherence (CRS) Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 0)
7 units on a scale

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. One participant (Participant 4) was not analyzed at Week 12 due to discontinuation caused by death.

The BARS is a 4-item scale that includes 3 questions and an overall visual analog rating scale that assesses participant's knowledge about his/her medication. The key measure of adherence is the visual analog scale and assesses the percentage of doses taken by the participants in the past month (0 percent \[%\] - 100%). The 3 questions include: number of prescribed doses per day, number of days in the past month when the participant did not take the prescribed doses, and the number of days in the past month when the participant took less than the prescribed dose. Due to early study termination collected data was not summarized. Hence, individual data for each participant was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 0)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 12)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 0)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 12)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 0)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 12)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 4 (Week 0)
97 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 0)
93 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 12)
90 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 0)
90 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 12)
96 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 0)
90 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 12)
95 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 0)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 12)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 0)
100 percent adherence
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication as Assessed by Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 12)
100 percent adherence

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12

Population: All enrolled participants who had a baseline CASP evaluation were included in the efficacy analysis set. One participant (Participant 4) was not analyzed at Week 12 due to discontinuation caused by death.

The PSS is a brief scale designed to capture a psychiatric patient's satisfaction with a clinician. The scale covers 6 domains: Trust (3 items), Communication (3 items), Exploration of Ideas/Options (2 items), Body Language (2 items), Active Listening (4 items), and Miscellaneous Items (6 items). Out of the 20 items, the first 19 are scored on a 5-point Likert Scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=satisfactory, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree). The last question (6f) is a free-response question asking for input on how the clinician might improve. Sum of scores of individual items give a total score (range 9-95). Higher scores indicate greater degree of satisfaction. Due to early study termination collected data was not summarized. Hence, individual data for each participant was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 0)
76 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 1 (Week 12)
76 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 0)
52 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 2 (Week 12)
57 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 0)
57 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 3 (Week 12)
57 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 4 (Week 0)
48 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 0)
66 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 5 (Week 12)
64 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 0)
76 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 6 (Week 12)
76 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 0)
76 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 7 (Week 12)
72 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 0)
63 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 8 (Week 12)
72 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 0)
71 units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Survey (PSS) Total Score at Week 0 and 12
Participant 9 (Week 12)
76 units on a scale

Adverse Events

Cohort 1

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
General disorders
Death
11.1%
1/9

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received treatment as usual (TAU) which include one or more of the 5 antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone) for 12 weeks.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
External ear inflammation
11.1%
1/9
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
11.1%
1/9
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
11.1%
1/9
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
11.1%
1/9
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
11.1%
1/9
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Miliaria
11.1%
1/9

Additional Information

DIRECTOR CLINICAL RESEARCH

Janssen R&D US

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER