Trial Outcomes & Findings for Ultra Low Dose CT for CACS and AC of SPECT (NCT NCT02458352)
NCT ID: NCT02458352
Last Updated: 2019-10-18
Results Overview
CAC and BA limits of agreement between coronary artery calcium score obtained from ultra-low-dose and standard CT. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a measure for quantification of coronary artery calcification based on non-contrast enhanced CT, ranging from 0 (no calcifications) to infinite. It is an arbitrary unit. Increasing CAC means higher amounts of coronary artery calcifications and is associated with worse prognosis. Bland-Altman (BA) analysis is a statistical method to compare two modalities or techniques assessing the same measure. Limits of agreement is defined as +/- twice the standard deviation of the differences between the reference method and the new modality/technique. Broader limits of agreement mean less accurate results obtained by the new modality/techniqe, while a 0 BA limit of agreement would theoretically reflect perfect agreement.
COMPLETED
NA
105 participants
1 days
2019-10-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard Dose CT, Ultra-low Dose CT
Standard dose and ultra-low dose non-contrast enhanced CT
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Clinically indicated non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC according to routine protocol Ultra-low dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Additional scan as part of the trial
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
105
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
105
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard Dose CT, Ultra-low Dose CT
n=105 Participants
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Clinically indicated non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC according to routine protocol
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=105 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
37 Participants
n=105 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
68 Participants
n=105 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
33 Participants
n=105 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
72 Participants
n=105 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 daysPopulation: 2/105 participants were not analyzed due to corrupt datasets.
CAC and BA limits of agreement between coronary artery calcium score obtained from ultra-low-dose and standard CT. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a measure for quantification of coronary artery calcification based on non-contrast enhanced CT, ranging from 0 (no calcifications) to infinite. It is an arbitrary unit. Increasing CAC means higher amounts of coronary artery calcifications and is associated with worse prognosis. Bland-Altman (BA) analysis is a statistical method to compare two modalities or techniques assessing the same measure. Limits of agreement is defined as +/- twice the standard deviation of the differences between the reference method and the new modality/technique. Broader limits of agreement mean less accurate results obtained by the new modality/techniqe, while a 0 BA limit of agreement would theoretically reflect perfect agreement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dose CT
n=103 Participants
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Clinically indicated non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC according to routine protocol
|
Ultra-low Dose CT
n=103 Participants
Ultra low dose non-contrast enhanced CT
Ultra low dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC using a novel protocol for ultra low dose radiation dose exposure
|
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement and Correlation of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Obtained From Ultra-low-dose and Standard CT
|
212 Agatston score
Interval 25.0 to 901.0
|
178 Agatston score
Interval 22.0 to 764.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: 2/105 participants were not analyzed due to corrupt datasets.
For every patient, the CT images from 120 and 70 kVp-CT scans were used to create CTAC maps which were then used to reconstruct SPECT images, displayed as a 17-segment model polar plot with normalized percent tracer uptake given for every segment. Intra-class correlation was then applied to compare segmental relative tracer uptake. Analysis and the resulting correlation coefficient of 0.987 basically demonstrates interchangeability between the two datasets.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dose CT
n=103 Participants
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT
Standard dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Clinically indicated non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC according to routine protocol
|
Ultra-low Dose CT
n=103 Participants
Ultra low dose non-contrast enhanced CT
Ultra low dose non-contrast enhanced CT: Non-contrast enhanced CT for CACS and AC using a novel protocol for ultra low dose radiation dose exposure
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intra-class Correlation Coefficient Between Segmental Relative Tracer Uptake From SPECT Datasets Reconstructed With AC Maps Based on Ultra-Low-Dose and Standard Dose CT
|
1 Intraclass correlation coefficient
|
0.987 Intraclass correlation coefficient
|
Adverse Events
Standard Dose CT
Ultra-low Dose CT
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place