Positive Pressure Ventilation and Sternal Closure in HLHS
NCT ID: NCT02455713
Last Updated: 2018-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-02-28
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nasal High-frequency Jet Ventilation (nHFJV) Following Extubation in Preterm Infants
NCT03558737
Infant Pulmonary Mechanics: High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal CPAP
NCT01939067
PEEP and V/Q Mismatch in Premature Infants
NCT03109613
Noninvasive Negative Pressure Ventilation to Support Failing Fontan Physiology
NCT03223168
Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Delivered by Two Different Modalities on Breathing Pattern in Preterm Infants
NCT01326975
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Specific Aims of this work are:
Specific Aim 1: Evaluate hemodynamics and lung mechanics across a range of PEEP (2-12 cm H2O) before and after chest closure, while maintaining consistent ventilation, in infants with single ventricle physiology who undergo delayed sternal closure after Stage 1 palliation surgery.
Specific Aim 2: Evaluate hemodynamics and lung mechanics across a range of tidal volumes (6-15ml/kg) and before and after chest closure, while maintaining consistent ventilation, in infants with single ventricle physiology who undergo delayed sternal closure after Stage 1 palliation surgery.
Hypotheses
1\. The effects of PEEP and tidal volume on hemodynamics and lung mechanics will be significantly different before and after sternal closure. We expect that there will be little effect of PEEP or tidal volume when the sternum remains open. Once the sternum is closed, we hypothesize that those with shunted single ventricle physiology will have optimal oxygen delivery and lung mechanics with modest PEEP and tidal volume (U-shaped curves).
Rationale: Delayed sternal closure is commonly used to prevent tissue tamponade and promote favorable hemodynamics in critically ill patients following surgery for congenital heart disease. This technique is frequently employed in shunted single ventricle physiology (i.e.- Norwood patients). While there have been several studies that have shown that sternal closure is associated with temporary hemodynamic changes and stiffer lung mechanics, there have been no prospective studies of the impact of different ventilator strategies on hemodynamics, and lung mechanics before and after sternal closure. Because these patients are generally among the most fragile postoperative patients, it is critical to understand if specific ventilator strategies can help mitigate any negative hemodynamic consequences of chest closure. The purpose of this study is to understand the critical cardiopulmonary interactions that occur with delayed sternal closure in this population, and to determine optimal approaches to mechanical ventilation under these different circumstances.
Cardiopulmonary interactions differ based on the underlying cardiac anatomy and physiology. Most studies of cardiopulmonary interactions following surgery for congenital heart disease have examined the difference between positive and negative pressure ventilation in those with right ventricular restrictive physiology such as after tetralogy of Fallot repair, or after cavopulmonary connection surgery. This work consistently shows improvement in cardiac output and pulmonary blood flow with negative pressure ventilation. It is not practical, however, to maintain negative pressure ventilation when the sternum remains open and it is not even clear that the same cardiopulmonary interactions are at play in the absence of significant elastic recoil forces of the chest wall.
Similarly, while patients with left ventricular dysfunction generally benefit from positive pressure ventilation, there is no data regarding the hemodynamic effects of positive pressure ventilation in left ventricular dysfunction when intrathoracic pressure will not deviate from atmospheric, which is the situation with delayed sternal closure.
Shunted single ventricle physiology is perhaps the most difficult for which to predict the effects of different ventilator strategies before and after sternal closure. The combination of parallel pulmonary and systemic circulations, less than optimal total cardiac output and, most commonly, at least some pulmonary edema make it difficult to predict the ideal ventilator strategy. Studies in this population have focused more on the effects of FiO2 and hyperventilation than on respiratory mechanics and cardiopulmonary interactions. Nevertheless, this work has shown that the occurrence of pulmonary venous desaturation is common following stage 1 Norwood surgery, and it remains unknown if there is risk or benefit from strategies such as lower or higher tidal volumes or lower or higher PEEP on hemodynamics and oxygen delivery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Alter PEEP and PIP and measure hemodynamic outcomes.
PEEP and PIP
Changing ventilator settings and measuring oxygen delivery and cardiac output
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEEP and PIP
Changing ventilator settings and measuring oxygen delivery and cardiac output
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Endotracheal tube leak \> 15%.
3. Lack of informed consent from parents.
4. Weight less than 2.6kg
1 Month
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Steven Schwartz
Professor of Paediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven Schwartz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1000047473
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.