Phase III Open Label First Line Therapy Study of MEDI 4736 (Durvalumab) With or Without Tremelimumab Versus SOC in Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

NCT ID: NCT02453282

Last Updated: 2025-09-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1118 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-21

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of MEDI4736 + tremelimumab combination therapy and MEDI4736 monotherapy versus platinum-based SoC chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) wild-type locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive treatment with MEDI4736 + tremelimumab combination therapy, MEDI4736 monotherapy, or Standard of Care (SoC) therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma NSCLC

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Monotherapy

PD-L1 monoclonal Antibody monotherapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MEDI4736 (Durvalumab)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Combination Therapy

PD-L1+Tremelimumab combination therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MEDI4736 (Durvalumab)+Tremelimumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Tremelimumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Standard of Care

Standard of Care chemotherapy treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paclitaxel + Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Agents

Gemcitabine + Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Agents

Gemcitabine + Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Agents

Pemetrexed + Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Agents

Pemetrexed + Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Agents

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MEDI4736 (Durvalumab)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

MEDI4736 (Durvalumab)+Tremelimumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Paclitaxel + Carboplatin

Chemotherapy Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine + Cisplatin

Chemotherapy Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine + Carboplatin

Chemotherapy Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Pemetrexed + Cisplatin

Chemotherapy Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Pemetrexed + Carboplatin

Chemotherapy Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Tremelimumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For inclusion in the study, patients should fulfill the following criteria:

* Aged at least 18 years
* Documented evidence of Stage IV NSCLC
* No sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement
* No prior chemotherapy or any other systemic therapy for recurrent/metastatic NSCLC
* World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status of 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria

1. Mixed small-cell lung cancer and NSCLC histology, sarcomatoid variant
2. Brain metastases or spinal cord compression unless asymptomatic, treated and stable (not requiring steroids)
3. Prior exposure to Immunomodulatory therapy (IMT), including, but not limited to, other anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death1 (PD-1), anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), or anti PD-L2 antibodies, excluding therapeutic anticancer vaccines
4. Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (including inflammatory bowel disease \[eg, colitis or Crohn's disease\]
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

130 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stuart McIntosh, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Cheshire, UK

Naiyer Rizvi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Yuma, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Redondo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Hollywood, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Summit, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Port Macquarie, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Southport, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Duffel, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Gauting, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hemer, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Homburg/Saar, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Immenhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Löwenstein, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Velbert, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Edelény, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Meldola, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

San Giovanni Rotondo, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Fukushima, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Himeji-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Hirakata-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Hirosaki-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Iizuka-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Iwakuni-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Izumi-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kanazawa, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kishiwada-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Koga-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Mitaka-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Nagaoka-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Saga, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Saitama-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sakaishi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sayama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shinjuku-ku, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tokushima, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Ube-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokosuka-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Arnhem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Changwon-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Cheongju-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Goyang-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Jinju, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seongnam-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seongnam-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Ulsan, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Jaén, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

León, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Majadahonda, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Bellinzona, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Hat Yai, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Hanoi, , Vietnam

Site Status

Research Site

Hanoi, , Vietnam

Site Status

Research Site

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Research Site

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada France Germany Hungary Italy Japan Netherlands Russia South Korea Spain Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garon EB, Cho BC, Reinmuth N, Lee KH, Luft A, Ahn MJ, Robinet G, Le Moulec S, Natale R, Schneider J, Shepherd FA, Garassino MC, Geater SL, Szekely ZP, Van Ngoc T, Liu F, Scheuring U, Patel N, Peters S, Rizvi NA. Patient-Reported Outcomes with Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab Versus Standard Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (MYSTIC). Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 Jul;22(4):301-312.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33775558 (View on PubMed)

Rizvi NA, Cho BC, Reinmuth N, Lee KH, Luft A, Ahn MJ, van den Heuvel MM, Cobo M, Vicente D, Smolin A, Moiseyenko V, Antonia SJ, Le Moulec S, Robinet G, Natale R, Schneider J, Shepherd FA, Geater SL, Garon EB, Kim ES, Goldberg SB, Nakagawa K, Raja R, Higgs BW, Boothman AM, Zhao L, Scheuring U, Stockman PK, Chand VK, Peters S; MYSTIC Investigators. Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab vs Standard Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The MYSTIC Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):661-674. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0237.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32271377 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-001279-39

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D419AC00001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.