Two-field Versus Three-field Lymphadenectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma Without Cervical Lymph Node Involvement

NCT ID: NCT02448953

Last Updated: 2015-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

786 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the lymph node dissection results and prognosis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma patients without cervical lymph node involvement by preoperative CT and/or ultrasound treated by two-field lymphadenectomy or three-field lymphadenectomy.Another purpose of this study is to clarify whether the lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve can be taken as the sentinel lymph node which is able to indicate neck lymph node metastasis and necessity for three-field lymphadenectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Esophageal carcinoma is a prevalent and aggressive malignant disease with poor prognosis in China. Complete surgical resection with systemic lymph node dissection remains the most effective treatment method for this malignancy. Although tree-field lymph node dissection was reported to be effective in improving long-term survival in Japan,there is no enough evidences yet to demonstrate that three field lymph node dissection is superior to two field lymph node dissection in reducing postoperative recurrence and improving long-term survival. In this study, the dissection of lymph node adjacent to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve would be performed and examined routinely by intraoperative frozen-section. If the lymph node is positive, three field lymph node dissection(Cervical-thoracic-upper abdominal lymphadenectomy) will be performed, if negative, the patients will be randomly assigned either to three-field lymphadenectomy group or two-field lymphadenectomy group. The purpose of this large scale multi-center trial is to compare the lymph node dissection results and prognosis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma without cervical lymph node involvement treated by three-field lymphadenectomy or two-field lymphadenectomy and clarify whether the lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve could be taken as sentinel lymph node indicating neck lymph node metastasis and necessity of three-field lymphadenectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

negative lymph node

lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve should be confirmed negative by intraoperative frozen pathology examination

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Two-field lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracic-upper abdominal two-field lymphadenectomy

Three-field lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cervical-thoracic-upper abdominal three-field completely lymphadenectomy

positive lymph node

lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve should be confirmed negative by intraoperative frozen pathology examination

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Three-field lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cervical-thoracic-upper abdominal three-field completely lymphadenectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Two-field lymphadenectomy

Thoracic-upper abdominal two-field lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Three-field lymphadenectomy

Cervical-thoracic-upper abdominal three-field completely lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with histologically confirmed squamous cell esophageal cancer, without any previous anti-tumor therapy;
2. Preoperative clinical TNM stage:cT1b-3N0-1M0;
3. Adequate cardiopulmonary, liver, brain and kidney functions for esophagectomy either via right thoracotomy or VATS;
4. No evidence of suspicious neck lymph node metastasis (LN short diameter \< 0.8cm or LN short/long diameter \<0.65 by cervical CT and/or ultrasound);
5. Willing to participate the clinical trial and sign the informed consent before being enrolled into clinical trail

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous use of anti-cancer therapy;
2. Preoperative clinical TNM stage: N2-3 or M1;
3. Inadequate cardiopulmonary,liver, brain and kidney function for surgery;
4. Previous malignancy history.
5. Suspicious neck lymph node metastasis (LN short diameter ≧0.8cm or LN short/long diameter ≧0.65 by cervical CT and/or ultrasound);
6. Unwilling to participate the clinical trial and refuse to sign informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Henan Cancer Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fujian Cancer Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tongji Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tang-Du Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Chest Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jie He

president

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jie He, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yousheng Mao, MD

Role: CONTACT

8610-87787138

Zhirong Zhang, MD

Role: CONTACT

8610-87788798

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yousheng Mao, MD

Role: primary

8610-87787138

Zhirong Zhang, MD

Role: backup

8610-87788798

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mao Y, Liu S, Han Y, Guo S, Chen C, Gao S, Hao A, Duan H, Fang W, Zhang R, Yu Z, Fu X, Li X, Wang Q, Tan L, Li Z, Li Y, Zhang Z, Wei W, Fang Y, Fu D, Wei X, Yuan L, Muhammad S, He J. Three-field vs two-field lymphadenectomy in thoracic ESCC patients: a multicenter randomized study (NST 1503). J Natl Cancer Cent. 2025 Jan 14;5(2):203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40265094 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NKTRDP-2015BAI12B08-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.