Xenodiagnosis After Antibiotic Treatment for Lyme Disease

NCT ID: NCT02446626

Last Updated: 2024-06-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-24

Study Completion Date

2022-05-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

The most common tick-borne illness in the United States, Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria that are transmitted to people by Ixodes scapularis ticks. Most cases of Lyme disease are cured by antibiotics, but some patients continue to experience symptoms despite the absence of detectable Lyme bacteria. Xenodiagnosis uses a vector to detect the presence of a disease-causing microbe. Researchers will use live, laboratory-bred ticks to see if Lyme disease bacteria can be detected in people after completing antibiotic therapy and if that is more common in people who continue to experience symptoms such as fatigue and joint pain.

Objectives:

\- To see if ticks can be used to detect B. burgdorferi in people who have had Lyme disease and received antibiotic therapy and if it correlates with persistent symptoms.

Eligibility:

* Adults at least 18 years old who have:
* Untreated erythema migrans (the Lyme disease rash); OR
* Untreated Lyme arthritis; OR
* Continuing symptoms after treatment for Lyme disease; OR
* Had Lyme disease and antibiotic treatment within the past 12 months.
* Healthy volunteers

Design:

* Participants will be screened with medical history, physical exam, and blood tests.
* Visit 1:
* Blood and urine tests, health questionnaire.
* Up to 30 laboratory-bred, pathogen-free, larval ticks (each smaller than a poppy seed) will be placed under a dressing.
* Participants may have two small biopsies of skin .
* 4 6 days later, Visit 2:
* Dressing will be removed and ticks will be collected.
* Participants will answer symptom questions.
* If many ticks are still attached, participants will have to come back the next day. If not enough ticks feed successfully, the procedure may be repeated.
* Participants will keep a diary of symptoms for 30 days. Over 3 months, they will be return to the clinic 3 times to see how they feel and answer questionnaires. Test results will be discussed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lyme disease is the most common vector borne disease in the United States. Although antibiotic therapy is clinically effective in treating the symptoms of Lyme disease for most patients early in the course of disease, a significant number of patients who receive therapy report persistent symptoms. The cause of persistent symptoms after antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease is an area of great controversy. Recent studies have shown that the organism (Borrelia burgdorferi) may persist in animals after antibiotic therapy and can be detected by using the natural tick vector (Ixodes scapularis) to acquire the organism through feeding (xenodiagnosis). Whether this occurs in humans is unknown. Currently available tests for human Lyme disease do not allow determination of persistent infection after antibiotic therapy.

We performed the first study of the use of I. scapularis larva for the xenodiagnosis of B. burgdorferi infection in humans. Our pilot study showed that xenodiagnosis was well tolerated with no severe adverse events (AEs). The most common AE was mild itching at the site. In this small pilot study, xenodiagnosis for B. burgdorferi was positive in 2 participants and indeterminate in 2 participants. Further studies are needed to determine the sensitivity of xenodiagnosis in evaluating the infection status of Lyme disease patients.

In this proposal, we want to further investigate the utility of xenodiagnosis for identifying persistence of infection with B. burgdorferi in treated human Lyme disease. Our objectives include assessing the link between detection of B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis and persistence of symptoms in patients diagnosed with Lyme disease, within 1 year, post therapy; compare the rate of detection of B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis after therapy in participants with posttreatment Lyme disease symptoms; identify subject characteristics related to the likelihood of detecting B. burgdorferi by xenodiagnosis including: time from infection, time between infection and therapy, time from therapy; and continue to assess the safety of xenodiagnosis in humans.

The results of study have the potential to resolve this long-standing controversy in Lyme disease pathogenesis. While xenodiagnosis is unlikely to be widely used in clinical practice due to the labor intensity and speed of testing, if our study shows a linkage between positive xenodiagnostic testing and persistence of symptoms after B. burgdorferi infection, it may prove to be a useful tool for testing new strategies for treatment and for correlation with more generally applicable diagnostic markers. Understanding the pathogenesis of persistent symptoms following Lyme disease, and identifying reliable diagnostic tests for determining the success of antibiotic therapy, is critical to the medical management of these patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lyme Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort #1: Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy

Participants with Lyme disease, post-therapy had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed.

Blood draw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peripheral blood draws will be performed.

Xenodiagnosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant.

Cohort #2: Patients with post-Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDs)

Participants with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) at least 12-months from initial treatment had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the previous site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed.

Blood draw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peripheral blood draws will be performed.

Xenodiagnosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant.

Cohort #3: New Acute Erythema Migrans

Participant with new onset of acute erythema migrans had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement.

Acute erythema migrans participant (possible positive control)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed.

Blood draw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peripheral blood draws will be performed.

Xenodiagnosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant.

Cohort #4: Untreated Lyme Arthritis

Participant with untreated Lyme arthritis had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied as close as possible to the site of Lyme disease manifestation. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement.

Lyme Arthritis participant (possible positive control)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed.

Blood draw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peripheral blood draws will be performed.

Xenodiagnosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant.

Cohort #5: Healthy Volunteers

Healthy volunteers with no history of Lyme disease had 25-30 clean laboratory-reared larval ticks applied to a body site that was comfortable for participant. Ticks were secured under a retention dressing and allowed to attach to the research participant. Ticks were removed 3 - 6 days after the placement.

Healthy Volunteers (negative control)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed.

Blood draw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peripheral blood draws will be performed.

Xenodiagnosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Skin biopsy

Optional 2-3mm skin punch biopsies will be performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Blood draw

Peripheral blood draws will be performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Xenodiagnosis

Larval ticks will be obtained from Dr. Sam Telford from a laboratory maintained tick colony at Tufts Veterinary School. These ticks are hatched from eggs laid by ticks that have fed only on specific pathogen free laboratory animals that were purchased from established vendors. Between 25-30 larval ticks that have been aged and are known to be ready to attach will be placed on the study participant.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Criteria for the diagnosis and therapy for Lyme disease can be found at the clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

PATIENTS WITH LYME DISEASE, POST-THERAPY (N=100)

1. Age 18 or older
2. Lyme disease diagnosed in the previous 13 months, fulfilling the case definition of confirmed or probable Lyme disease by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/lyme-disease/case-definition/2017/).
3. Completion of 1 course of antibiotics at least 3 months and up to 12 months between the end of the therapy and the xenodiagnostic procedure.
4. Antibiotic treatment fulfills the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the recommended therapy for Lyme disease

PATIENTS WITH POST-LYME DISEASE COMPLAINTS AT LEAST 12 MONTHS FROM INITIAL TREATMENT (N=40)

1. Age 18 or older.
2. Diagnosed with confirmed or probable Lyme disease fulfilling the case definition of Lyme disease by the CDC (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/lyme-disease/case-definition/2017/).
3. Received recommended antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease 5 at least 12 months between the end of the initial antibiotic therapy and the xenodiagnostic procedure.
4. Persistent or recurrent symptoms that began or worsened within 6 months of the diagnosis and treatment for Lyme disease.

ACUTE EM (N=40)

1. Age 18 or older.
2. EM diagnosed by the study physician.
3. Receiving antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease for less than 48 hours.

LYME ARTHRITIS (N=40)

1. Age 18 or older.
2. Lyme arthritis and have not received antibiotic therapy for the disease.

HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS (N=20)

1. Age 18 or older.
2. No prior history of Lyme disease.
3. Negative whole cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or C6-based antibody test for Lyme disease.

Patients with recently diagnosed (acute) EM (within 48 hours of starting antibiotic therapy) and patients with untreated Lyme arthritis will be recruited in an attempt to increase the chances of finding a positive result by xenodiagnosis (an attempt of a positive control) While patients with acute untreated EM would be the best positive control group, it would be unethical to withhold therapy in these patients for the few days required for tick feeding, due to the risk of dissemination of the organism and possible morbidity. Patients with untreated Lyme arthritis will be recruited to establish whether xenodiagnosis can be used to identify infection in late stage Lyme patients where the bacterium is known to be present. These patients have been infected for months and will not be harmed for delaying therapy for a few days. Lyme arthritis is a late manifestation of B. burgdorferi infection, and hematogenous dissemination already occurred at this late stage. Studies have shown that the presence or absence of previous antibiotic treatment is more predictive than the duration of untreated arthritis for the success of antibiotic therapy in Lyme arthritis. Similarly, patients who just started therapy for EM may still have live Borrelia in the skin and xenodiagnosis may be able to recover the bacteria (but culture of skin biopsies from patients with EM become negative very quickly - within one dose - on antibiotic therapy).

While treatment for Lyme disease will not be offered under this protocol, it may be available via different clinical research protocols or regular medical care at the study site. If not, treatment will be prescribed by the patient's primary care. For patients with untreated early Lyme disease (erythema migrans), antibiotics can be started at the same day of tick placement. For patients with untreated Lyme arthritis, antibiotics can be started after collection of xenodiagnostic ticks (usually 4-5 days, up to 7 days). For patients with Lyme arthritis, if less than 14 ticks fed successfully and if the participant agrees, antibiotic treatment can be delayed until after the repeat procedure.

Patients with acute EM and untreated Lyme arthritis will be able to re-enroll as Patients with Lyme disease, post-therapy. Therefore, in case of positive results, we will be able to compare between the procedures.

Negative control patients will include healthy volunteers from Lyme endemic areas who have never been diagnosed with Lyme disease and have a negative B. burgdorferi ELISA and C6 antibody titer.

Exclusion Criteria

1. No antibiotic therapy active against Lyme disease in the previous 3 months (except patients with acute EM). Prophylaxis with a single dose of doxycycline 200 mg is not an exclusion.
2. History of allergy to surgical tape or dressing.
3. History of severe reactions to tick bites (granuloma or systemic reactions).
4. Inability to maintain the dressing for any reason.
5. Pregnancy or lactation.
6. Unwillingness to use an effective method of birth control for the duration of participation in the study (women of child-bearing potential only) and for at least 3 months following the last tick placement.
7. Use of investigational therapy and devices during the time of the study and/or in the month prior to signing the informed consent.
8. Active severe skin disease, uncontrolled diabetes, cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancers, autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy, or history of HIV, chronic viral hepatitis, or syphilis.
9. Oral or IV steroids in the previous 2 weeks (topical, nasal, inhaled, intra-articular, and replacement doses of steroids are not exclusions).
10. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for enrollment or could interfere with the patient participating in and completing the study.
11. Refusal to participate in specimen collection and storage for future study related use.

EXCLUSION FROM SKIN BIOPSY PART OF THE PROTOCOL

1. History of forming large thick scars (keloids) after skin injuries or surgery.
2. History of excessive bleeding after cuts or procedures.
3. Currently taking anticoagulants.
4. History of allergy to lidocaine.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stony Brook University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mansfield Family Practice LLC

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tufts Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adriana R Marques, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mansfield Family Practice

Storrs, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University (State University of New York)

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Medical College

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marques A, Telford SR 3rd, Turk SP, Chung E, Williams C, Dardick K, Krause PJ, Brandeburg C, Crowder CD, Carolan HE, Eshoo MW, Shaw PA, Hu LT. Xenodiagnosis to detect Borrelia burgdorferi infection: a first-in-human study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):937-45. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit939. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24523212 (View on PubMed)

Telford SR 3rd, Hu LT, Marques A. Is there a place for xenodiagnosis in the clinic? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Nov;12(11):1307-10. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.966084.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25301228 (View on PubMed)

Hodzic E, Imai D, Feng S, Barthold SW. Resurgence of persisting non-cultivable Borrelia burgdorferi following antibiotic treatment in mice. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086907. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24466286 (View on PubMed)

Turk SP, Lumbard K, Liepshutz K, Williams C, Hu L, Dardick K, Wormser GP, Norville J, Scavarda C, McKenna D, Follmann D, Marques A. Post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms score: Developing a new tool for research. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 11;14(11):e0225012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225012. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31710647 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-I-0131

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

150131

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Human Immune Response to Ixodes Scapularis Tick Bites
NCT05036707 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Ceftriaxone for Post-Treatment Lyme Disease
NCT06785402 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Borrelia B-cell Diagnostics
NCT06045416 RECRUITING
Phase 1/2 Lyme Vaccine Study
NCT01504347 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2