Comparison of Efficacy and Frequency of Adverse Events of 1st Line Palliative Chemotherapy EOX and mDCF Regimens in Advanced HER2-negative Gastric Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT02445209

Last Updated: 2015-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy and safety of palliative chemotherapy EOX and mDCF regimens in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main purposes: to determine the overall survival (OS) of patients who have locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with first-line EOX (epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine) or mDCF (docetaxel + cisplatin + leucovorin + 5fluorouracil) palliative chemotherapy regimens

The secondary purposes: to determine safety (as assessed by adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0) and the progression-free survival (PFS)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HER2 Negative Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EOX

Epirubicin 50mg/m2 IV on day 1; Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 IV on day 1; Capecitabine 625mg/m2/day PO BID days 1-21; Cycled every 21 days. Cycled every 3 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles initially (24 weeks of treatment).

Patients who experienced a long term response to the initial 8 cycles of EOX chemotherapy, could be rechallenged with the same regimen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EOX

Intervention Type OTHER

combined chemotherapy regimen: epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine

mDCF

Docetaxel 40 mg/m2 IV od day 1; Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1; 5fluorouracyl 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1; 5fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/d IV continuous infusion days 1-2; Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV on day 3; Cycled every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles initially (24 weeks of treatment).

Patients who experienced a long term response to the initial 12 cycles of mDCF chemotherapy, could be rechallenged with the same regimen

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

mDCF

Intervention Type OTHER

combined chemotherapy regimen: docetaxel + leucovorin + 5fluorouracil + cisplatin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EOX

combined chemotherapy regimen: epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine

Intervention Type OTHER

mDCF

combined chemotherapy regimen: docetaxel + leucovorin + 5fluorouracil + cisplatin

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 years
* histologically confirmed inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction;
* ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2;
* adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function;
* measurable or nonmeasurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Patients with intraoperatively confirmed intraperitoneal metastases but without detectable disease in radiological studies were also eligible

Exclusion Criteria

* HER2- positive tumors defined as either IHC 3+ or IHC 2+, the latter in combination with FISH+
* previous chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease
* surgery \<3 weeks before the onset of the study treatment
* congestive heart failure
* significant dysphagia that would preclude oral administration of capecitabine
* concurrent malignant disease, except for adequately treated tumors with high likelihood of being cured (e.g. basal cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical cancer)
* clinical evidence of brain metastases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jagiellonian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sebastian Ochenduszko

Sebastian Ochenduszko, MD PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sebastian Ochenduszko, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jagiellonian University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, Middleton G, Daniel F, Oates J, Norman AR; Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group of the National Cancer Research Institute of the United Kingdom. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):36-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073149.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18172173 (View on PubMed)

Shah MA, Stoller R, Shibata S, et al. Random assignment multicenter phase II study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil (mDCF) versus DCF with growth factor support (GCSF) in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GE). 2010 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ochenduszko S, Puskulluoglu M, Konopka K, Fijorek K, Urbanczyk K, Budzynski A, Matlok M, Lazar A, Sinczak-Kuta A, Pedziwiatr M, Krzemieniecki K. Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line palliative chemotherapy with EOX and mDCF regimens in patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase 3 trial. Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):242. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0687-7. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26354521 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JagiellonianU-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.