TOF Versus SOX in Metastatic Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02442362

Last Updated: 2015-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of aclitaxel/oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (TOF) regimen and S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen for metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gastric carcinoma ranks second among the most common causes of cancer deaths worldwide, with especial high prevalence in Asia . Gastric cancer is the third most common cancer in China and the incidence rate and death rate of gastric cancer in Jiangsu Province are especially higher than the national average. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment for gastric cancer, but approximately two-thirds of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Prognosis in these patients is poor, with a median survival time of 3 to 5 months without treatment and a reported 5-year survival rate of 9.4%. Even receiving curative gastrectomy, 60% of mGC patients develop local recurrences or distant metastasis.

For advanced-stage patients with inoperable gastric tumors, chemotherapy is considered the most effective treatment option and the efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy has been acknowledged. However, a worldwide consensus on standard chemotherapy regimens has yet to be established. The prognosis has gradually improved because of advances in chemotherapy regimens, but is not yet satisfactory.Among various regimens, the combinations of paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (TOF) regimen and S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen have become two important ones.

Paclitaxel can bind to microtubules and induces hyperstabilization leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The response rate of GC patients to paclitaxel is 20%-25%. Oxaliplatin is a third-generation diaminocyclohexane platinum compound which has a wide range of antitumor activities, appearing to have a better safety profile than cisplatin. The response rate of mGC patients to FOLFOX-4 regimen is 38%-43%. S-1 is an oral anti-cancer agent composed of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and oteracil potassium. The applying of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for mGC can improve the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival. A meta-analysis showed OS favored S-1-based chemotherapy over 5-FU-based chemotherapy in mGC. S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) have showed non-inferiority to S-1 plus cisplatin in PFS and that the treatment was well tolerated in patients with mGC.

No study is available comparing the efficacy and safety of TOF and SOX regimens. So the investigators performed the present randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of the two regimens in mGC patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TOF Group

Patients in the TOF group received chemotherapy with "paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil"

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients treated with "paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil": paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 iv) on day 1, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 iv) on day 1, fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 continuous iv) on day 1-5twice/day for body surface area between 1.25 and 1.50 m2 orally) on days 1-14.

SOX Group

The patients in the SOX group received chemotherapy with 'oxaliplatin+S1'

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

oxaliplatin+S1

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients treated with "oxaliplatin+S1": oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 iv) on day 1 and S-1 (40 mg twice/day for body surface area \< 1.25 m2 and 60 mg twice/day for body surface area between 1.25 and 1.50 m2 orally) on days 1-14

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil

Patients treated with "paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil": paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 iv) on day 1, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 iv) on day 1, fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 continuous iv) on day 1-5twice/day for body surface area between 1.25 and 1.50 m2 orally) on days 1-14.

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin+S1

Patients treated with "oxaliplatin+S1": oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 iv) on day 1 and S-1 (40 mg twice/day for body surface area \< 1.25 m2 and 60 mg twice/day for body surface area between 1.25 and 1.50 m2 orally) on days 1-14

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TOF regimen SOX regimen

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. pathologically confirmed mGC (stage IV)
2. ages between 20 and 80 years
3. measurable or assessable lesions by imaging studies according to the RECIST guideline 21
4. no prior chemotherapy except for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for more than 12 months before entry into the study
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score less than 3
6. hepatic function

* total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × the institutional upper limit of normal value, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ≤ 2.5 × the institutional upper limit of normal value, and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 × the institutional upper limit of normal value
* renal function (serum creatinine level ≤ 1.5 mg/dL and creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min)
* adequate bone marrow function (hemoglobin level ≥ 90 g/L, white blood cell count of 4-10×109/L, neutrophil count ≥ 2×109/L, and platelet count ≥ 100×109/L)
7. estimated life expectancy more than 3 months
8. no other secondary malignant tumors.

Exclusion Criteria

1. preexisted peripheral toxicity ≥ grade 2 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria
2. concurrent or prior malignancy
3. central nervous system metastases
4. concurrent treatment that interfered with the study evaluation
5. active infection
6. other uncontrolled underlying medical conditions that would impair the ability of the patients to receive the planned treatment
7. having inadequate calorie and fluid intake
8. pregnant, and breastfeeding women or women of child-bearing potential without adequate contraception.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First People's Hospital of Changzhou

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Liangrong Shi

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Changping Wu, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

the First People' Hospital of Changzhou

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CZ-GA-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.