Trial Outcomes & Findings for Condition of Submental Fullness and Treatment Outcomes Registry (NCT NCT02438813)
NCT ID: NCT02438813
Last Updated: 2018-10-05
Results Overview
An adverse event is any undesirable medical occurrence or worsening of an existing condition that occurs after SMF reduction treatment, irrespective of whether the event is considered treatment related. A treatment-emergent adverse event is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving treatment.
COMPLETED
1029 participants
Up to 19 Months
2018-10-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Enrolled Participants
All enrolled participants who signed informed consent whether or not they elected to receive treatment as per standard of care in clinical practice for submental fat (SMF). Treatments for SMF included: ATX1-101, Surgical Procedures, Laser Liposuction, Energy Devices or Other Treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1029
|
|
Overall Study
Received Treatment for SMF
|
676
|
|
Overall Study
Did Not ReceiveTreatment for SMF
|
353
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
504
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
525
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Enrolled Participants
All enrolled participants who signed informed consent whether or not they elected to receive treatment as per standard of care in clinical practice for submental fat (SMF). Treatments for SMF included: ATX1-101, Surgical Procedures, Laser Liposuction, Energy Devices or Other Treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Patient Decision
|
59
|
|
Overall Study
Patient Lost to Follow-Up
|
137
|
|
Overall Study
Study Ended by Sponsor
|
80
|
|
Overall Study
Patients Not Treated/No EOT Visit
|
249
|
Baseline Characteristics
Condition of Submental Fullness and Treatment Outcomes Registry
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Enrolled Participants
n=1029 Participants
All enrolled participants who signed informed consent whether or not they elected to receive treatment as per standard of care in clinical practice for submental fat (SMF). Treatments for SMF included: ATX1-101, Surgical Procedures, Laser Liposuction, Energy Devices or Other Treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18 to 30 years
|
81 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
31 to 50 years
|
427 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
51 to 65 years
|
413 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>65 years
|
108 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
883 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 19 MonthsPopulation: Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
An adverse event is any undesirable medical occurrence or worsening of an existing condition that occurs after SMF reduction treatment, irrespective of whether the event is considered treatment related. A treatment-emergent adverse event is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
|
13.2 percentage of participants
|
8.7 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
5.2 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to the Follow-up Visit (Up to 9 Months) and Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) Visit (Up to 18 Months)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants with a baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit. Participants may have received more than one treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for this outcome measure at the given time-point.
The CR-SMFRS is based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant's chin and neck area using a 5-point ordinal scale (0 to 4) with 0=Absent Submental Convexity: no localized submental fat evident; 1=Mild Submental Convexity: minimal, localized submental fat; 2=Moderate Submental Convexity: prominent, localized submental fat; 3=Severe Submental Convexity; a marked amount of chin fat; and 4=Extreme Submental Convexity: marked, localized submental fat. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
n=676 Participants
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)
Change to EOT Visit
|
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
-2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)
Baseline
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)
Change to Follow-up Visit
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to the Follow-up Visit (Up to 9 Months) and Baseline to End of Treatment Visit (Up to 18 Months)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants with a baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit. Participants may have received more than one treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for this outcome measure at the given time-point.
The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question "How much fat do you have under your chin right now?" answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 to 4) with 0=No chin fat at all, 1=A slight amount of chin fat, 2=A moderate amount of chin fat, 3=A large amount of chin fat, and 4=A very large amount of chin fat. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
n=676 Participants
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
Baseline
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
Change to Follow-up Visit
|
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
-2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
Change to EOT Visit
|
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to the Follow-up Visit (Up to 9 Months) and Baseline to End of Treatment Visit (Up to 18 Months)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants with a baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit. Participants may have received more than one treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for this outcome measure at the given time-point.
The PR-SMFIS assesses the impact of submental fat on self-perception of 6 emotional and visual characteristics related to the appearance of submental fullness (unhappy, bothered, self-conscious, embarrassed, look older, and look overweight) as evaluated by the participant. Each item is rated on an 11-point numeric scale from 0 to 10. Scores for the 6 items were averaged to generate a PR-SMFIS total scale score ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is a positive outcome and 10 is a negative outcome. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
n=676 Participants
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale (PR-SMFIS)
Baseline
|
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
7.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
9.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale (PR-SMFIS)
Change to Follow-up Visit
|
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
-4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
-2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale (PR-SMFIS)
Change to EOT Visit
|
-2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
-2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to the Follow-up Visit (Up to 9 Months) and Baseline to End of Treatment Visit (Up to 18 Months)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants with a baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit. Participants may have received more than one treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for this outcome measure at the given time-point.
The participant was asked to answer the question: "Considering your appearance in association with your face and chin, how satisfied do you feel with your appearance at the present time?" using a 7-point scale: 0=Extremely dissatisfied, 1=Dissatisfied, 2=Slightly dissatisfied, 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4=Slightly satisfied, 5=Satisfied, and 6=Extremely satisfied. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
n=676 Participants
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)
Baseline
|
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)
Change to Follow-up Visit
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)
Change to EOT
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment Visit (Up to 18 Months)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants with a baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit. Participants may have received more than one treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for this outcome measure at the given time-point.
The participant rated their facial age in years at Baseline and at the End of Treatment Visit by answering the question: How many years difference compare to your actual age? A negative number indicates younger and a positive number indicates older. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
n=676 Participants
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Patient Self-Perception of Age (SPA)
Baseline
|
-1.4 years
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
0.5 years
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
3.0 years
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
-0.5 years
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
-0.6 years
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
-1.2 years
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Patient Self-Perception of Age (SPA)
Change to EOT Visit
|
-1.5 years
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
-5.6 years
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
-10.0 years
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
-0.6 years
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-0.8 years
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
-1.6 years
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to the Follow-up Visit (Up to 9 Months) and Baseline to End of Treatment Visit (Up to 18 Months)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants with a baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit. Participants may have received more than one treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for this outcome measure at the given time-point.
SMSLG assessment was based on clinical evaluation and palpation of the submental area. The SMSLG scale incorporates 3 features: skin wrinkling, adherence to underlying neck structures (bone and muscle) and redundancy (horizontal and vertical folds). Grade 1 (none): no or minimal superficial wrinkling, skin well apposed to deeper neck structures, no skin redundancy \[no skin draping or skin sagging\]; Grade 2 (mild): mild superficial wrinkling, skin well apposed to deeper neck structures, minimal skin redundancy \[slight skin draping and sagging\]; Grade 3 (moderate): may have mild to moderate superficial wrinkling, skin has mild to moderate separation from deeper neck structures, moderate skin redundancy \[moderate skin draping and skin sagging\]; Grade 4 (severe): mild to marked superficial wrinkling, loose skin separated from deeper neck structures, marked skin redundancy \[marked skin draping and sagging\]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 Participants
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 Participants
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 Participants
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 Participants
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 Participants
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Not Elected Treatment
n=676 Participants
All enrolled participants who did not elect to have treatment for SMF.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Submental Skin Laxity Scale (SMSLG)
Baseline
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Submental Skin Laxity Scale (SMSLG)
Change to Follow-up Visit
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Submental Skin Laxity Scale (SMSLG)
Change to EOT Visit
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
Adverse Events
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
Surgical
Laser Liposuction
Energy Devices
Other Treatments
All Treated Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Deoxycholic Acid (ATX-101)
n=570 participants at risk
Deoxycholic acid injection (ATX-101) as treatment for SMF as per standard of care.
|
Surgical
n=23 participants at risk
Surgical procedures for the treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Laser Liposuction
n=5 participants at risk
Laser Liposuction for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Energy Devices
n=77 participants at risk
Energy Devices as treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
Other Treatments
n=9 participants at risk
Other Treatments for treatment of SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice.
|
All Treated Participants
n=676 participants at risk
All participants who received treatment for SMF as per standard of care in clinical practice: ATX1-101, Surgical Procedures, Laser Liposuction, Energy Devices or Other Treatments.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
10.4%
59/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
5.2%
4/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
9.3%
63/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site hypoaesthesia
|
6.7%
38/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
1.3%
1/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
5.8%
39/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
6.5%
37/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
5.6%
38/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
3.2%
18/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
2.8%
19/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site nodule
|
0.88%
5/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.89%
6/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Application site ulcer
|
0.00%
0/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cutaneous symptom
|
0.00%
0/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.44%
3/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site oedema
|
1.4%
8/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
1.2%
8/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site discomfort
|
0.70%
4/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.59%
4/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site nerve damage
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site paraesthesia
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site scab
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Uncoded
|
0.35%
2/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.30%
2/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.18%
1/570 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/23 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/77 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
0.15%
1/676 • Up to 19 Months
Safety Population included all participants who received at least one treatment. Participants may have received more than one treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institution and/or Investigator shall allow Sponsor not less than 45 days to review any manuscript and not less than 30 days to review any poster presentation, abstract or any other written or oral material which describes or discloses the Study results. Institution and Investigator agree that because the Study is part of a multi-center Study, any publication by Institution or Investigator of the Study Results shall not be made before the first multi-center publication of participating sites.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER