Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dispensing Study for the Phenacite Project (NCT NCT02436005)
NCT ID: NCT02436005
Last Updated: 2020-11-18
Results Overview
Subjective ratings of lens comfort. Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
2020-11-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Phenacite Then Comfilcon A
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly for two weeks then cross-over to comfilcon A lenses for two weeks.
Phenacite: contact lenses comfilcon A: Contact Lenses
|
Comfilcon A Then Phenacite
Subjects will be randomized to wear comfilcon A contact lenses for two weeks then cross-over to Phenacite Lenses for two weeks.
comfilcon A: Contact Lenses Phenacite : Contact Lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
12
|
13
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
12
|
13
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
12
|
13
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
12
|
12
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Phenacite Then Comfilcon A
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly for two weeks then cross-over to comfilcon A lenses for two weeks.
Phenacite: contact lenses comfilcon A: Contact Lenses
|
Comfilcon A Then Phenacite
Subjects will be randomized to wear comfilcon A contact lenses for two weeks then cross-over to Phenacite Lenses for two weeks.
comfilcon A: Contact Lenses Phenacite : Contact Lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Second Intervention
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Study
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite and comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly for two weeks.
Phenacite: contact lenses (Not the final Design - Further clinical studies were conducted to validate the new design)
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
24 participants
n=24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.
Subjective ratings of lens comfort. Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings of Lens Comfort
|
86.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.99
|
90.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.60
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 WeeksSubjective ratings of lens comfort. Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings of Lens Comfort
|
66.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.22
|
71.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.62
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksOver Refraction for optimized distance acuity measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Over Refraction for Optimized Distance Acuity
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
|
-0.10 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Over Refraction for Optimized Distance Acuity
OS (Oculus sinister - left eye)
|
-0.02 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
|
-0.18 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.21 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksBinocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
|
-0.19 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.20 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
|
0.03 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksBinocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
|
-0.16 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.19 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksBinocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
|
-0.20 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.18 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
|
0.01 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.01 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksBinocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
|
-0.02 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.03 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Investigator assessment of Amount of movement (to the nearest 0.1mm) immediately after the blink (0.1mm steps)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
|
0.23 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.20 mm
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
|
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OS(oculus sinister - left eye)
|
0.23 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.22 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksInvestigator assessment of Amount of movement (to the nearest 0.1mm) immediately after the blink (0.1mm steps)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
|
0.24 mm
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.23 mm
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
|
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OS (oculus sinister - left eye)
|
0.25 mm
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.24 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Investigator assessment using Continuous Scale 0-100% (1% steps): 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%=Optimum, 100%=No movement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OD (oculus Dexter - Right eye)
|
50.43 mm
Standard Deviation 5.09
|
51.52 mm
Standard Deviation 5.40
|
|
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OS (Oculus Sinister - Left eye)
|
49.78 mm
Standard Deviation 4.77
|
50.65 mm
Standard Deviation 4.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksInvestigator assessment using Continuous Scale 0-100% (1% steps): 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%=Optimum, 100%=No movement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
|
52.83 mm
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
49.35 mm
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
|
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OS (Oculus Sinister - Left Eye)
|
51.30 mm
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
48.70 mm
Standard Deviation 4.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.50 steps: 0=Immobile - no lag in any versions, 1=Restricted - no lag in some directions but slight lag (0-0.25mm) in others, 2=Secure - slight lag (0.25-0.5mm in each version), 3=Unrestricted - freely lags in a controlled manner on all versions, but not excessive (0.5-1.0mm), 4=Very mobile - excessive lag (\>1mm) on versions in all directions in 0.25 steps
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lens Mobility Rating
OD (oculus dexter - Right Eye)
|
3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
|
Lens Mobility Rating
OS (Oculus Sinister - Left eye)
|
3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
3.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksInvestigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.50 steps: 0=Immobile - no lag in any versions, 1=Restricted - no lag in some directions but slight lag (0-0.25mm) in others, 2=Secure - slight lag (0.25-0.5mm in each version), 3=Unrestricted - freely lags in a controlled manner on all versions, but not excessive (0.5-1.0mm), 4=Very mobile - excessive lag (\>1mm) on versions in all directions in 0.25 steps
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lens Mobility Rating
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
|
2.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
3.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
|
Lens Mobility Rating
OS (oculus sinister - left eye)
|
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.25 steps: 0=Can't be worn, 1=Poor - should not be dispensed although no immediate danger, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Optimum in 0.25 steps
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
|
3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OS ( oculus sinister - Left Eye)
|
3.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksInvestigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.25 steps: 0=Can't be worn, 1=Poor - should not be dispensed although no immediate danger, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Optimum in 0.25 steps
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OS (oculus sinister - left eye)
|
3.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OD (oculus dexter- right eye)
|
3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Distance Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Distance Vision
|
86.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.13
|
91.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPatient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Distance Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Distance Vision
|
85.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
88.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Near Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Near Vision
|
92.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.16
|
92.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPatient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Near Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Near Vision
|
84.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88
|
85.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Computer Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Computer Vision
|
92.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.75
|
93.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPatient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Computer Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Computer Vision
|
85.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.27
|
89.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Overall Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Overall Vision
|
91.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
|
92.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPatient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Overall Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Overall Vision
|
85.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.66
|
88.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksCorneal staining extent was assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0-No Staining, 1 - 1-15% of area, 2- 16-30% of area, 3- 31-45% of area, 4- \>45% of area
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Staining Extent
Central
|
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Corneal Staining Extent
Nasal
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Corneal Staining Extent
Temporal
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Corneal Staining Extent
Superior
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
|
Corneal Staining Extent
Inferior
|
0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksConjunctival staining was assessed on a scale of 0-4, 0.50 steps (0-None, 1 - Minimal diffuse punctuate, 2- Coalescent Punctuate, 3- confluent, 4- Deep confluent
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Phenacite: contact lenses
|
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
comfilcon A: contact lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Conjunctival Staining
Nasal
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
|
Conjunctival Staining
Temporal
|
0.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
|
Conjunctival Staining
Superior
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
|
Conjunctival Staining
Inferior
|
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
Adverse Events
Phenacite
Comfilcon A
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place