Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dispensing Study for the Phenacite Project (NCT NCT02436005)

NCT ID: NCT02436005

Last Updated: 2020-11-18

Results Overview

Subjective ratings of lens comfort. Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

25 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Results posted on

2020-11-18

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Phenacite Then Comfilcon A
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly for two weeks then cross-over to comfilcon A lenses for two weeks. Phenacite: contact lenses comfilcon A: Contact Lenses
Comfilcon A Then Phenacite
Subjects will be randomized to wear comfilcon A contact lenses for two weeks then cross-over to Phenacite Lenses for two weeks. comfilcon A: Contact Lenses Phenacite : Contact Lenses
First Intervention
STARTED
12
13
First Intervention
COMPLETED
12
13
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Second Intervention
STARTED
12
13
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
12
12
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
0
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Phenacite Then Comfilcon A
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly for two weeks then cross-over to comfilcon A lenses for two weeks. Phenacite: contact lenses comfilcon A: Contact Lenses
Comfilcon A Then Phenacite
Subjects will be randomized to wear comfilcon A contact lenses for two weeks then cross-over to Phenacite Lenses for two weeks. comfilcon A: Contact Lenses Phenacite : Contact Lenses
Second Intervention
Adverse Event
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Overall Study
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite and comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly for two weeks. Phenacite: contact lenses (Not the final Design - Further clinical studies were conducted to validate the new design) comfilcon A: contact lenses
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants
n=24 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
Age, Continuous
27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
n=24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants
n=24 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.

Subjective ratings of lens comfort. Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings of Lens Comfort
86.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.99
90.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.60

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 Weeks

Subjective ratings of lens comfort. Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings of Lens Comfort
66.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.22
71.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.62

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Over Refraction for optimized distance acuity measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Over Refraction for Optimized Distance Acuity
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
-0.10 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.00
Over Refraction for Optimized Distance Acuity
OS (Oculus sinister - left eye)
-0.02 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.00

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.

Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
-0.18 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.21 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
-0.19 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.20 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.05

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.

Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
0.03 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.

Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
-0.16 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.19 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
-0.20 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.18 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.06

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis.

Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
0.01 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.01 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.10

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
-0.02 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.03 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Investigator assessment of Amount of movement (to the nearest 0.1mm) immediately after the blink (0.1mm steps)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
0.23 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.20 mm
Standard Deviation 0.06
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OS(oculus sinister - left eye)
0.23 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.22 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Investigator assessment of Amount of movement (to the nearest 0.1mm) immediately after the blink (0.1mm steps)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
0.24 mm
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.23 mm
Standard Deviation 0.08
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
OS (oculus sinister - left eye)
0.25 mm
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.24 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Investigator assessment using Continuous Scale 0-100% (1% steps): 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%=Optimum, 100%=No movement

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OD (oculus Dexter - Right eye)
50.43 mm
Standard Deviation 5.09
51.52 mm
Standard Deviation 5.40
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OS (Oculus Sinister - Left eye)
49.78 mm
Standard Deviation 4.77
50.65 mm
Standard Deviation 4.73

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Investigator assessment using Continuous Scale 0-100% (1% steps): 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%=Optimum, 100%=No movement

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
52.83 mm
Standard Deviation 7.64
49.35 mm
Standard Deviation 4.50
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
OS (Oculus Sinister - Left Eye)
51.30 mm
Standard Deviation 5.94
48.70 mm
Standard Deviation 4.23

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.50 steps: 0=Immobile - no lag in any versions, 1=Restricted - no lag in some directions but slight lag (0-0.25mm) in others, 2=Secure - slight lag (0.25-0.5mm in each version), 3=Unrestricted - freely lags in a controlled manner on all versions, but not excessive (0.5-1.0mm), 4=Very mobile - excessive lag (\>1mm) on versions in all directions in 0.25 steps

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Lens Mobility Rating
OD (oculus dexter - Right Eye)
3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
Lens Mobility Rating
OS (Oculus Sinister - Left eye)
3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
3.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.50 steps: 0=Immobile - no lag in any versions, 1=Restricted - no lag in some directions but slight lag (0-0.25mm) in others, 2=Secure - slight lag (0.25-0.5mm in each version), 3=Unrestricted - freely lags in a controlled manner on all versions, but not excessive (0.5-1.0mm), 4=Very mobile - excessive lag (\>1mm) on versions in all directions in 0.25 steps

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Lens Mobility Rating
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
2.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
3.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
Lens Mobility Rating
OS (oculus sinister - left eye)
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.25 steps: 0=Can't be worn, 1=Poor - should not be dispensed although no immediate danger, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Optimum in 0.25 steps

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OD (oculus dexter - right eye)
3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OS ( oculus sinister - Left Eye)
3.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.25 steps: 0=Can't be worn, 1=Poor - should not be dispensed although no immediate danger, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Optimum in 0.25 steps

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OS (oculus sinister - left eye)
3.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OD (oculus dexter- right eye)
3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Distance Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Distance Vision
86.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.13
91.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Distance Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Distance Vision
85.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5
88.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.34

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Near Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Near Vision
92.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.16
92.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.70

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Near Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Near Vision
84.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88
85.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Computer Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Computer Vision
92.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.75
93.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.91

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Computer Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Computer Vision
85.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.27
89.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Population: One Subject was excluded from the analysis

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Overall Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Overall Vision
91.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
92.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Overall Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Overall Vision
85.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.66
88.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Corneal staining extent was assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0-No Staining, 1 - 1-15% of area, 2- 16-30% of area, 3- 31-45% of area, 4- \>45% of area

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Corneal Staining Extent
Central
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Corneal Staining Extent
Nasal
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Corneal Staining Extent
Temporal
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Corneal Staining Extent
Superior
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
Corneal Staining Extent
Inferior
0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Conjunctival staining was assessed on a scale of 0-4, 0.50 steps (0-None, 1 - Minimal diffuse punctuate, 2- Coalescent Punctuate, 3- confluent, 4- Deep confluent

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phenacite
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly. Phenacite: contact lenses
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly. comfilcon A: contact lenses
Conjunctival Staining
Nasal
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
Conjunctival Staining
Temporal
0.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
Conjunctival Staining
Superior
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
Conjunctival Staining
Inferior
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27

Adverse Events

Phenacite

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Comfilcon A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Paul Chamberlain

CooperVision Inc.

Phone: 925 730-6754

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place