Effect of Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Stability During Placement of a Mayfield Head Fixation Device for Craniotomy
NCT ID: NCT02430389
Last Updated: 2015-06-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Remifentanil
Intravenous bolus of 10 mL of remifentanil (0.7 mcg/kg based on ideal body weight) will be given ninety seconds before head pinning as well as an intravenous bolus of propofol (0.7 mg/kg).
Remifentanil
Ninety seconds before pinning, an IV bolus of 10 mL of remifentanil (0.7 µg•kg-1 based on ideal body weight) will be administered from the study syringe and an IV bolus of propofol (0.7 mg•kg-1) will be administered
Normal Saline
Intravenous bolus of 10 mL normal saline from study syringe will be given ninety seconds before head pinning as well as an intravenous bolus of propofol (0.7 mg/kg).
Normal Saline
Ninety seconds before pinning, an IV bolus of 10 mL of normal saline will be administered from the study syringe and an IV bolus of propofol (0.7 mg•kg-1) will be administered
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil
Ninety seconds before pinning, an IV bolus of 10 mL of remifentanil (0.7 µg•kg-1 based on ideal body weight) will be administered from the study syringe and an IV bolus of propofol (0.7 mg•kg-1) will be administered
Normal Saline
Ninety seconds before pinning, an IV bolus of 10 mL of normal saline will be administered from the study syringe and an IV bolus of propofol (0.7 mg•kg-1) will be administered
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* undergoing general anesthesia for a craniotomy
* requiring a Mayfield head fixation device.
Exclusion Criteria
* non-English speaking,
* pregnancy,
* opioid tolerance,
* illegal drug use or alcohol abuse.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Laura Hemmer
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laura Hemmer, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cole CD, Gottfried ON, Gupta DK, Couldwell WT. Total intravenous anesthesia: advantages for intracranial surgery. Neurosurgery. 2007 Nov;61(5 Suppl 2):369-77; discussion 377-8. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000303996.74526.30.
Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, Dorman BH. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022.
Gazoni FM, Pouratian N, Nemergut EC. Effect of ropivacaine skull block on perioperative outcomes in patients with supratentorial brain tumors and comparison with remifentanil: a pilot study. J Neurosurg. 2008 Jul;109(1):44-9. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/7/0044.
Hans P, Brichant JF, Dewandre PY, Born JD, Lamy M. Effects of two calculated plasma sufentanil concentrations on the hemodynamic and bispectral index responses to Mayfield head holder application. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1999 Apr;11(2):81-5. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199904000-00002.
Colley PS, Dunn R. Prevention of blood pressure response to skull-pin head holder by local anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1979 May-Jun;58(3):241-3. No abstract available.
Jamali S, Archer D, Ravussin P, Bonnafous M, David P, Ecoffey C. The effect of skull-pin insertion on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence of sufentanil and fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 1997 Jun;84(6):1292-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199706000-00022.
Coles JP, Leary TS, Monteiro JN, Brazier P, Summors A, Doyle P, Matta BF, Gupta AK. Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy: a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil, and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000 Jan;12(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200001000-00004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00007835
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id