Arterial Stiffness and General Anesthesia Induced Hypotension in Patients on Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors
NCT ID: NCT02416024
Last Updated: 2019-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
72 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-08-31
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Previous studies have shown that patients chronically taking angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a higher incidence of developing hypotension under general anesthesia as well as being refractory to adrenergic vasoconstrictor medications given to help restore systemic blood pressure. Interestingly, not all patients taking ACE inhibitors have shown the described hemodynamic response after induction of general anesthesia. Therefore, investigators are attempting to identify what changes in vascular physiology in those patients may contribute to acute refractory systemic hypotension. Specifically, investigators wish to explore whether differences in baseline levels of arterial stiffness potentially contribute to this phenomenon. Arterial applanation tonometry is a non-invasive technique that has been shown to reliably provide indices of arterial stiffness. In the proposed project, applanation tonometry will be performed on the right carotid and femoral arteries to assess carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, a surrogate for aortic stiffness. (SphygmoCor system, AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) The measurement will be obtained before induction of general anesthesia in the pre-surgical area. During induction of general anesthesia with standard induction agents, brachial blood pressure will be measured by a cuff every minute up to 10 minutes after tracheal intubation. A hypotensive response to anesthesia will be defined by a systolic arterial blood pressure below 90mmHg upon induction. Hypotensive patients that do not respond to vasoconstrictor medications (i.e. requires more than 200 mcg phenylephrine to maintain systolic arterial blood pressure above 90 mmHg) will be classified as 'refractory hypotensive." Using non-invasive applanation tonometry, we will be able to examine if aortic stiffness has a propensity to become refractory hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. This information will potentially help identify future patients that might be at greater risk of developing refractory hypotension in response to induction of general anesthesia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transthoracic Echocardiography of Inferior Vena Cava Before Spinal Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension
NCT03266250
Chronic Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Intermediate Risk Surgery
NCT01669434
Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index and Caval Aorta Index for Prediction of Hypotension General Anaesthesia
NCT05368363
The Ability Of Inferior Vena Caval Distensibility Index With Passive Leg Raising Test To Predict Spinal Anesthesia-induced Hypotension In Elderly Patients Undergoing Infra-umbilical Surgeries. A Prospective Observational Study.
NCT05991063
Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index for Prediction of Hypotension After Induction of General Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
NCT06814054
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Interestingly, this refractory systemic hypotension does not occur in all anesthetized patients prescribed ACE inhibitors. Notably, easily treatable systemic arterial hypotension after induction of general anesthesia is not a clinical problem. Critical issue arises only if the patient under general anesthesia does not respond to therapeutic doses of adrenergic agonists. Therefore, identifying patients who will demonstrate refractory hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia is a novel idea and has significant clinical implications for peri-operative blood pressure control by anesthesiologists.
Thus, the overall goals of the proposed research will be to use preoperative non-invasive measures of vascular stiffness to predict which patients might be at risk for severe hypotension that is refractory to adrenergic vasoconstrictor medications following induction of general anesthesia in patients chronically treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Method/Design: The study will be human subject non-randomized observational study. This study will be conducted at day of surgery administration area and main operation room at University of Iowa Hospitals and clinics. Arterial stiffness will be measured at day of surgery administration area prior to the surgery.
Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Aortic Stiffness). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) will be determined by applanation tonometry using the Sphygmocor system by sequentially recording ECG-gated carotid and femoral artery waveforms. Pulse wave signals will be recorded by tonometers positioned at the base of the right common carotid artery and over the right femoral artery. The time (t) between the feet of simultaneously recorded waves will be determined as the mean of 10 consecutive cardiac cycles. PWV is calculated by the system software from the distance between measurement points (D) and the measured time delay (t) as follows: cfPWV = D/Δt (m/s) where D is distance in meters and t is the time interval in seconds.
Prior to induction intravenous fluid administration will be restricted to less than 500 ml. A standardized protocol will be followed which is commonly used by anesthesia providers. Prior to induction of anesthesia, in addition to ASA standard monitors, neuromuscular twitch monitor and Entropy monitor will be attached to the patient. Induction agents will include 1.5mg/kg propofol, 2µg/kg fentanyl, 100mg lidocaine, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium of lean body weight. Inhaled anesthetic will be sevoflurane at 0.5 MAC with 5L/min of 100% oxygen starting at mask ventilation till 10 minutes after tracheal intubation. Blood pressure will be measured by a brachial cuff prior to induction and every minute after intubation for 10 minutes. If the systolic pressure drops below 90 mmHg or more than 25% from baseline, the patient will be classified in the study as "Hypotensive." Conversely, if the patient's systolic blood pressure does not drop below 90 mmHg more than 25% from baseline within 10 minutes of intubation, the patient will be classified as "Not Hypotensive." If the patient's systolic blood pressure rises above 25% the baseline value, the anesthesiologist will administer a bolus of 0.5mg/kg of propofol. This bolus will be repeated after the minute blood pressure evaluations until the systolic blood pressure back to the baseline value. These patients will be classified as "Not Hypotensive," but the administration of propofol will be noted. In attempt to bring systolic blood pressure up to above 90 mmHg or more than 25% from baseline in "hypotensive" patients, the anesthetic provider will use 100µg phenylephrine (or 5mg ephedrine if heart rate \< 50bpm) within 10 minutes of intubation. If over 200µg phenylephrine (10mg ephedrine) has been used without a return of the systolic brachial blood pressure \>90 mmHg or more than 25% from baseline, the patient will be classified in the study as "Refractory Hypotensive." The study environment will be ended and the provider can use whatever vasoactive drugs they deem appropriate, including more phenylephrine, ephedrine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, or vasopressin, and/or fluid bolus. The total given doses of each vasopressor medication will be recorded. Anesthetic induction, blood pressure measurements, and medication to correct low and high blood pressure as described above are all part of the patients' standard clinical procedures as performed by the anesthesiologist. The patients who required more than 2 times laryngoscopy, required other than standard anesthetics, or entropy \>70 or \<30, will be exclude from data analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Refractory hypotension group
Patient who did not require more than 200 mcg of phenylephrine to maintain systemic blood pressure during 10 minutes after induction of general anesthesia.
SphygmoCor system
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) will be determined by applanation tonometry using the Sphygmocor system by sequentially recording ECG-gated carotid and femoral artery waveforms. Pulse wave signals will be recorded by tonometers positioned at the base of the right common carotid artery and over the right femoral artery. The time (t) between the feet of simultaneously recorded waves will be determined as the mean of 10 consecutive cardiac cycles. PWV is calculated by the system software from the distance between measurement points (D) and the measured time delay (t) as follows: cfPWV = D/Δt (m/s) where D is distance in meters and t is the time interval in seconds.
Control
Patient who required more than 200 mcg of phenylephrine to maintain systemic blood pressure during 10 minutes after induction of general anesthesia
SphygmoCor system
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) will be determined by applanation tonometry using the Sphygmocor system by sequentially recording ECG-gated carotid and femoral artery waveforms. Pulse wave signals will be recorded by tonometers positioned at the base of the right common carotid artery and over the right femoral artery. The time (t) between the feet of simultaneously recorded waves will be determined as the mean of 10 consecutive cardiac cycles. PWV is calculated by the system software from the distance between measurement points (D) and the measured time delay (t) as follows: cfPWV = D/Δt (m/s) where D is distance in meters and t is the time interval in seconds.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SphygmoCor system
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) will be determined by applanation tonometry using the Sphygmocor system by sequentially recording ECG-gated carotid and femoral artery waveforms. Pulse wave signals will be recorded by tonometers positioned at the base of the right common carotid artery and over the right femoral artery. The time (t) between the feet of simultaneously recorded waves will be determined as the mean of 10 consecutive cardiac cycles. PWV is calculated by the system software from the distance between measurement points (D) and the measured time delay (t) as follows: cfPWV = D/Δt (m/s) where D is distance in meters and t is the time interval in seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
The second study population will include 20 adult patients over 50 years old who are not taking an ACE inhibitor and are currently taking a beta blocker, a calcium channel blocker, or a diuretic for more than 3 months, scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia in the Main Operating Room at the UIHC.
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Iowa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kenichi Ueda
Clinical Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gasecki D, Rojek A, Kwarciany M, Kowalczyk K, Boutouyrie P, Nyka W, Laurent S, Narkiewicz K. Pulse wave velocity is associated with early clinical outcome after ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis. 2012 Dec;225(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.024. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, Benjamin EJ. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):505-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
Blann AD, Kuzniatsova N, Lip GY. Inflammation does not influence arterial stiffness and pulse-wave velocity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Oct;27(10):629-34. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.17. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
Ozturk S, Baltaci D, Ayhan SS, Durmus I, Gedikli O, Soyturk M, Yazici M, Celik S. Assessment of the relationship between aortic pulse wave velocity and aortic arch calcification. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2012 Dec;40(8):683-9. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2012.83707.
Dangardt F, Chen Y, Berggren K, Osika W, Friberg P. Increased rate of arterial stiffening with obesity in adolescents: a five-year follow-up study. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057454. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
Nordstrand N, Gjevestad E, Hertel JK, Johnson LK, Saltvedt E, Roislien J, Hjelmesaeth J. Arterial stiffness, lifestyle intervention and a low-calorie diet in morbidly obese patients-a nonrandomized clinical trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Apr;21(4):690-7. doi: 10.1002/oby.20099.
Alecu C, Cuignet-Royer E, Mertes PM, Salvi P, Vespignani H, Lambert M, Bouaziz H, Benetos A. Pre-existing arterial stiffness can predict hypotension during induction of anaesthesia in the elderly. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):583-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq231. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201308815
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.