Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Patient Centered Outcomes for People With Sickle Cell Disease in the Acute Care Setting (NCT NCT02411396)
NCT ID: NCT02411396
Last Updated: 2019-06-27
Results Overview
Time is recorded from the time the patient arrives for pain treatment at either the ED or IC until the time the patient is dosed with pain medication administered parenterally. Guideline recommendations are that patients receive non-oral pain medication within 60 minutes of arrival.
COMPLETED
483 participants
Within 6 hours after arrival
2019-06-27
Participant Flow
There are a total of 483 adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) enrolled from the end of April 2015 to December, 2016. 145 from Johns Hopkins (JH), 101 from Case Western (CW), 110 from Our Lady of the Lake Hospital (OLL) and 127 from Blood Center of Wisconsin (BCW). Four hundred forty two patients have completed 18 months follow up
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) in Patients With SCD
Patients treated for uncomplicated Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) in ICs and EDs.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
483
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
442
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
41
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) in Patients With SCD
Patients treated for uncomplicated Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) in ICs and EDs.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of Patient Centered Outcomes for People With Sickle Cell Disease in the Acute Care Setting
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
VOC in Patients With SCD
n=483 Participants
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in ICs and EDs.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
476 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
293 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
190 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
477 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
471 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
483 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 6 hours after arrivalPopulation: Not all participants enrolled in the study visited the ED or the IC for uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis. The total number of subjects analyzed exceeds the total number of subjects because the same subject could visit the ED or IC one or more times.
Time is recorded from the time the patient arrives for pain treatment at either the ED or IC until the time the patient is dosed with pain medication administered parenterally. Guideline recommendations are that patients receive non-oral pain medication within 60 minutes of arrival.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to EDs
n=1558 number of visits
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in EDs.
|
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to ICs
n=1469 number of visits
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in ICs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time (Minutes) From Arrival to Center to Time First Dose of Parenteral Pain Medication Administered
|
125.3 minutes
Interval 118.3 to 131.8
|
61.8 minutes
Interval 59.3 to 64.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 of admissionPopulation: Not all participants enrolled in the study visited the ED or the IC for uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis. The total number of subjects analyzed exceeds the total number of subjects because the same subject could visit the ED or IC one or more times.
Odds for admission to the hospital versus discharge to home (ED vs IC)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to EDs
n=1556 number of visits
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in EDs.
|
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to ICs
n=1468 number of visits
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in ICs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disposition From Acute Care Visit
Number of visits being hospitalized
|
517 number of visits
|
128 number of visits
|
|
Disposition From Acute Care Visit
Number of visits being sent home
|
1039 number of visits
|
1340 number of visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 minutes after administrationPopulation: Not all participants enrolled in the study visited the ED or the IC for uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis. The total number of subjects analyzed exceeds the total number of subjects because the same subject could visit the ED or IC one or more times.
Odds of being re-assessed for pain within 30 minutes of receiving first dose of pain medication in ED vs IC. NHLBI guidelines recommend that patients are re-assessed for adequacy of pain management 30 minutes after receiving pain medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to EDs
n=1394 number of visits
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in EDs.
|
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to ICs
n=1455 number of visits
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in ICs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Reassessment Within 30 Minutes of First Dose of Parenteral Pain Medication Administered
Number of visits being reassessed in 30 mins
|
287 number of visits
|
544 number of visits
|
|
Pain Reassessment Within 30 Minutes of First Dose of Parenteral Pain Medication Administered
Number of visits not being reassessed in 30 mins
|
1107 number of visits
|
911 number of visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 72 hours of acute visitPopulation: 207 participants completed the satisfaction survey after their first visit during the study time period.
Survey to capture patient satisfaction with the quality of care in either the ED or IC. Validated a new tool to assess satisfaction with care in the acute care setting. The new tool was developed based on existing tools that assessed several domains: adequacy of pain management, communication with providers, interpersonal aspects of care, provider competence, involvement of family/friends, and access to care. The final 15 item validated Patient Satisfaction with Pain Management in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) (PSPS) scale was used to compare satisfaction of care comparing ED to IC acute visits. Overall mean satisfaction scores ranged from 0-7 with higher scores signifying greater satisfaction
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to EDs
n=85 Participants
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in EDs.
|
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to ICs
n=122 Participants
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in ICs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Satisfaction With Care Received
|
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
5.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 72 hours of acute visitPopulation: Only 205 patients completed the perception of risk question at the first visit to either the ED or the IC.
One question on the survey asked patients to rate the overall level of medical safety they felt during their visit to the ED or IC. Choices for responses: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor. Excellent and Very Good were determined as having greater feelings of overall safety while patients who chose Good, Fair or Poor were determined having lesser feelings of overall safety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to EDs
n=87 Participants
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in EDs.
|
VOC in Patients With SCD Who Went to ICs
n=118 Participants
Patients treated for uncomplicated VOC in ICs
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Perception of Risk From Visit
Greater feelings of overall medical safety
|
43 Participants
|
98 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Perception of Risk From Visit
Lesser feelings of overall safety
|
44 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
Adverse Events
VOC in Patients With SCD
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Sophie Lanzkron, MD, MHS, Associate Professor of Medicine and Oncology
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place