Initiation of a Deceased Donor Uterine Transplantation Program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center
NCT ID: NCT02409147
Last Updated: 2023-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2018-07-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transplantation of Uterus for Uterine infertiLIty From Living Donor or Deceased Donor
NCT05726305
Uterus Transplantation From Live Donor
NCT01844362
Study Of The Metabolic Parameters Of Uterine Muscle Cells
NCT03784157
Uterus Transplantation From Live Donors and From Deceased Donors - Clinical Study
NCT03277430
Uterus Transplantation From Live Donors With Robotic Assisted Surgery - Gothenburg II
NCT02987023
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prior to the success of the Swedish team, two other European/Asian medical research groups have attempted deceased donor uterus transplantation. The first resulted in organ failure from unclear pathology. The second was a successful transplant, but failed to yield a childbirth due to multiple miscarriages. In 2004 however, the team from the Sahlgrenska Institute in Gothenburg instituted a rigorous research undertaking in order to study the phenomenon and to obtain a childbirth. Using established immunological knowledge, and practical experience using animal models, the investigators were able over a course of a decade, to start an active transplant program.
From a medical/obstetrics and gynecology standpoint, potential subjects were screened using a rigorous physical and psychosocial evaluation. This involved meeting with multiple members of the research team, in addition to independent monitors familiar with the field and the risks and benefits of participation. To facilitate success, all women and their partners underwent investigation to rule out any sterility factors that could have been related to fertility. Next, egg harvesting and embryo transfer was undertaken according to currently accepted protocols. Of note, all women who had uterine agenesis had some type of neo-vaginal recreation in order to facilitate IVF. Finally, donor and recipient HLA matching was done using standard transplantation methods in order to avoid unacceptable matches.
During surgery, the donor underwent an extensive procedure in order to successfully dissect out the artery and venous supply of the organ. The vagina was transected caudal to the fornix, thus allowing a donor specimen which was attached by only the vascular pedicles. (The process of removing a uterus from a living donor is infinitely more complex than that of a deceased donor, hence our initial plan at UNMC is to focus on organs derived from the latter.) Once the organ was removed, it was flushed with preservation solution using standard transplantation protocols. The recipient surgery was also performed in standard fashion, with the donor iliac vessels anastomosed to the recipients. The vaginal rim of the graft was sutured to the recipient's vagina in standard fashion. Routine intra-operative examinations with Doppler (to assess blood flow) were then performed prior to the termination of the operation.
Maintenance immunosuppression was given to the recipients using standard accepted protocols with close monitoring of drug levels. Serial Doppler US were done both during hospitalization and in follow up to assess uterine viability. Clinical examination from an obstetrician was performed at pre-determined intervals and biopsies of uterine tissue were taken to assess for organ viability and to rule out rejection. Those few patients who did have rejection were treated with standard transplantation protocols with increased steroids only.
Embryo transfer was done at approximately 1 year post transplant, in order to ensure continued viability and normal menstruation of the organ. Post transfer, hormonal stimulation was done using standard reproductive endocrinology protocols. Serial monitoring of the fetus was done at routine intervals through the 9 month gestational period. Finally, a caesarean section was performed in routine fashion at time of birth.
Our groups rationale at UNMC is to continue to build on the accepted protocols developed by the Swedish team and apply them to deceased donors. The investigators believe our vast experience in transplant and obstetrics/gynecology combined with reproductive endocrinology facilitates undergoing this exciting new medical and surgical therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Healthy female volunteers wishing to have a childbirth via uterine transplantation
Uterine Transplant
Surgical implantation of a deceased donor uterus, induction therapy with thymoglobulin or basiliximab, maintenance immunosuppression with Prograf, Cellcept, and Prednisone. Anti-infective treatment with Bactrim and Valcyte and Nystatin. Anti-platelet therapy with aspirin. IVF per standard protocol. At time of birth: ceasarean section. Ultimately, transplant hysterectomy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Uterine Transplant
Surgical implantation of a deceased donor uterus, induction therapy with thymoglobulin or basiliximab, maintenance immunosuppression with Prograf, Cellcept, and Prednisone. Anti-infective treatment with Bactrim and Valcyte and Nystatin. Anti-platelet therapy with aspirin. IVF per standard protocol. At time of birth: ceasarean section. Ultimately, transplant hysterectomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Female of reproductive age with intact native ovaries and no medical contraindication to transplantation, including surgical procedure and subsequent immunosuppression, and no medical contraindication to reproduction and gestation in a transplanted uterus. Evaluation for a medical contraindication will be determined by a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at UNMC.
2. Diagnosed with either congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility (UFI) and counseled about alternate options for family building including gestational surrogacy and/or adoption and provided access to these alternate services. Acquired circumstances may include nonfunctional uterus and hysterectomy due to benign disease (uterine fibroids, Asherman's syndrome, pelvic infection, postpartum hemorrhage) or gynecologic malignancy of the uterus or cervix. Additionally, UFI may be a result of congenital anomaly of the uterus and uterine agenesis.
3. If uterine removal was for uterine or cervical cancer a minimum 5 year recurrence-free time period will be required.
4. If MRKH Syndrome (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser) or Mullerian agenesis is present, the patient has a negative evaluation for other relevant congenital abnormalities (such as a pelvic kidney). Additionally, women with Mulllerian agenesis who have absence of the vagina must have had neovaginal creation surgery prior to uterine transplant in order to allow for embryo transplantation and monitoring of the organ after transplant.
5. Ovaries are intact with adequate ovarian reserve as determined by accepted markers including anti-Mullerian hormone level (AMH), astral follicle count and/or early follicular follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels.
6. Desires a biological child and is unable or unwilling to consider gestational surrogacy, and / or seeks uterine transplantation as a means to experience gestation, with an understanding of the limitations provided by the uterine transplant in this respect.
7. Meets psychological evaluation criteria, e.g.,stable, committed relationship with an individual who supports uterine transplant and intends to co-parent; emotionally mature with good coping skills and no significantly adverse mental health history; normal intellect allowing careful analysis of risks and benefits; no evidence of coercion; no significant evidence of previous noncompliance with medical care; no evidence of frank unsuitability for motherhood (e.g., previous conviction for child abuse).
8. Likely to comply with medical management, including antirejection immune suppression, frequent follow-up with surgical team, time-sensitive reproductive endocrinology management, high-risk pregnancy management, possible high-risk neonatal management.
9. Likely to be able to accommodate potential adverse outcomes such as loss of graft, inability to conceive, loss of pregnancy, adverse fetal or neonatal outcome.
10. Willing to consider transplant hysterectomy or termination of pregnancy if medically necessary.
11. Willing to undergo oocyte harvest and in-vitro fertilization prior to transplantation, with at least six viable embryos cryopreserved in anticipation of post-transplant implantation.
12. Financially able to cover anticipated expenses of assisted reproductive services, either through third party coverage or through personal assets.
Exclusion Criteria
21 Years
35 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nebraska
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexander T Maskin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNMC
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0138-15-FB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.