Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (NCT NCT02407236)
NCT ID: NCT02407236
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Results Overview
As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score less than or equal to (\<=)2 points, with no individual subscore greater than (\>)1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding \[RB\], endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant ulcerative colitis (UC) medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
961 participants
Week 8
2025-04-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Induction Study(IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6mg/kg IV
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
Maintenance Study(MS): Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)
Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab who were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 12 Weeks (q12w)
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 8 Weeks (q8w)
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
MS: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders(IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
Long Term Extension (LTE): Placebo SC
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and received placebo SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of long term extension (LTE).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders (IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
STARTED
|
319
|
320
|
322
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
296
|
309
|
307
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
11
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
175
|
172
|
176
|
103
|
157
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
132
|
148
|
158
|
76
|
128
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
43
|
24
|
18
|
27
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
115
|
141
|
143
|
73
|
116
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
34
|
99
|
101
|
0
|
95
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
81
|
42
|
42
|
73
|
21
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Induction Study(IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6mg/kg IV
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
Maintenance Study(MS): Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)
Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab who were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 12 Weeks (q12w)
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 8 Weeks (q8w)
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
MS: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders(IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
Long Term Extension (LTE): Placebo SC
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and received placebo SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of long term extension (LTE).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders (IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
17
|
9
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Study (8 Weeks)
Other
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
8
|
4
|
11
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
9
|
6
|
12
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
7
|
8
|
4
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Study (44 Weeks)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
17
|
10
|
11
|
9
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
6
|
12
|
7
|
6
|
|
Long-term Extension Period (176 Weeks)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
63
|
19
|
19
|
55
|
6
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
Maintenance Study(MS): Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)
Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab who were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 12 Weeks (q12w)
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 8 Weeks (q8w)
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
MS: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders(IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
Long Term Extension (LTE): Placebo SC
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and received placebo SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of long term extension (LTE).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders (IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
Total
n=961 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.50 • n=5 Participants
|
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94 • n=7 Participants
|
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67 • n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.70 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
130 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
379 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
197 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
195 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
582 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
292 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
295 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
290 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
877 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
143 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
9 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
29 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
248 participants
n=5 Participants
|
239 participants
n=7 Participants
|
243 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
730 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
49 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
39 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
21 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
16 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
54 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
45 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
39 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Israel
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
33 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
107 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
16 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
71 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
24 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russia
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
74 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
89 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
21 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
179 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Korea
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
26 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: The primary efficacy analysis set (PEAS) consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score less than or equal to (\<=)2 points, with no individual subscore greater than (\>)1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding \[RB\], endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant ulcerative colitis (UC) medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)
|
17 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
As per US definition, clinical remission was defined as absolute stool number \<=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]) without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components pertaining to this outcome measure (OM) (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per US Definition)
|
20 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w), or placebo SC.
As per global definition, clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score \<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)
|
42 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Per US definition, clinical remission: absolute stool number \<=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]), without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of Mayo components pertaining to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (as Per US Definition)
|
43 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8
|
44 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
Clinical response was defined as a decrease from induction baseline in the Mayo score by \>=30 percent (%) and \>= 3 points, with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore \>=1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8
|
100 Participants
|
164 Participants
|
199 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were analyzed for this outcome measure (OM).
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of event onward or participants who had missing IBDQ score at Week 8 had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=317 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=316 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=321 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8
|
16.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.39
|
33.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.53
|
35.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Clinical response: decrease from induction baseline in Mayo score by \>= 30% and \>= 3 points, with either decrease from induction baseline in rectal bleeding subscore \>=1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who lost clinical response at any time before Week 44, had prohibited change in UC medication, ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44
|
78 Participants
|
117 Participants
|
125 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 or who had missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44
|
50 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS included all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w/ placebo SC.
Per global definition, clinical remission was defined as Mayo score \<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score: sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; and 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to have achieved OM of clinical remission and not receiving corticosteroids at Week 44. Participants who had missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had their last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)
|
41 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number \<=3, rectal bleeding subscore 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0(normal or inactive disease)/ 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores rated: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or were missing all 3 of Mayo components related to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at Week 44. Participants with missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per US Definition)
|
42 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants who were in clinical remission at maintenance baseline.
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score \<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score: sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; and 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Participants who were not in clinical remission at any time points when endoscopic scores were collected before Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission up to Week 44. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=45 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=40 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=38 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per Global Definition)
|
17 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants who were in clinical remission at maintenance baseline.
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number \<=3, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44/ missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in clinical remission. Participants not in clinical remission at any time point when endoscopic scores collected before Week 44 considered not in clinical remission up to Week 44. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=48 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=52 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=44 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per US Definition)
|
16 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study, with participants whose mucosal healing status was determined at Week 8.
Mucosal healing is defined as having both endoscopic healing (EH) and histologic healing (HH). Endoscopic healing: an endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 mild disease (\[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Histologic healing: neutrophil infiltration in \<5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, and no erosions or ulcerations or granulation tissue. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8 or had missing endoscopy score/ were missing any component of histologic healing (that is assessment of neutrophils in crypts, crypt destruction/ erosions/ ulcerations/ granulations) at Week 8 or who had unevaluable biopsy (that is biopsy collected, but could not be assessed due to sample preparation or technical errors) at Week 8 but who did not achieve endoscopic healing, were considered not to have mucosal healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=316 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=316 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=315 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8
|
28 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as Mayo score \<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had missing rectal bleeding subscores at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission with a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants in Clinical Remission With a Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0 at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)
|
17 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal) and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 and/or both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 8
|
72 Participants
|
132 Participants
|
144 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
Normal or inactive mucosal disease is defined as an endoscopy score of 0. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have normal or inactive mucosal disease. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants in With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 8
|
12 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were analyzed for this OM.
The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline Mayo score carried forward to Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=321 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8
|
-1.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
-3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
-3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were analyzed for this outcome measure.
The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores; rated as 0 \[normal\] to 3 \[severe\]). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants with the partial Mayo score missing at a timepoint had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=321 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 8
Change at Week 2
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
-1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 8
Change at Week 4
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
-2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
-2.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 8
Change at Week 8
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
-2.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
-2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were analyzed for this OM.
The stool frequency subscore of Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Stool frequency scores: 0 =normal number of stools, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo stool frequency subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=321 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 2:Normal number of stools
|
16 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 2:1-2 stools more than normal
|
82 Participants
|
99 Participants
|
94 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 2: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
85 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 2: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
136 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
111 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 4:Normal number of stools
|
30 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 4:1-2 stools more than normal
|
85 Participants
|
122 Participants
|
126 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 4: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
81 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 4: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
123 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 8:Normal number of stools
|
28 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 8:1-2 stools more than normal
|
93 Participants
|
112 Participants
|
110 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 8: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
76 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Week 8: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
122 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
The rectal bleeding subscore of the Mayo Score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Rectal bleeding scores: 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, and 3 = blood alone passed. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo rectal bleeding subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 2: No blood seen
|
83 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
120 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 2:Streaks of blood with stool < half time
|
119 Participants
|
122 Participants
|
131 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 2: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
94 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 2: Blood alone passed
|
23 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 4:No blood seen
|
117 Participants
|
138 Participants
|
161 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 4:Streaks of blood with stool < half time
|
103 Participants
|
117 Participants
|
115 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 4: Obvious blood with stool most of time
|
75 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 4: Blood alone passed
|
24 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 8:No blood seen
|
119 Participants
|
173 Participants
|
204 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 8:Streaks of blood with stool < half the time
|
106 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 8: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
73 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Week 8: Blood alone passed
|
21 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
The endoscopy findings subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Endoscopy finding scores: 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo endoscopy subscore at Week 8 had the last available value for that subscore carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8
Week 8: Normal or inactive disease
|
12 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8
Week 8:Mild disease
|
32 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8
Week 8: Moderate disease
|
99 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8
Week 8: Severe disease
|
176 Participants
|
140 Participants
|
151 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
The physician's global assessment subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Physician's global assessment scores: 0 = normal, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo physician's global assessment subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 4: Severe disease
|
43 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 2: Normal
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 2:Mild disease
|
66 Participants
|
82 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 2: Moderate disease
|
194 Participants
|
193 Participants
|
181 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 2: Severe disease
|
56 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 4:Normal
|
13 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 4:Mild disease
|
82 Participants
|
118 Participants
|
137 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 4: Moderate disease
|
181 Participants
|
164 Participants
|
138 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 8:Normal
|
21 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 8:Mild disease
|
83 Participants
|
136 Participants
|
135 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 8: Moderate disease
|
153 Participants
|
115 Participants
|
106 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Week 8: Severe disease
|
62 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: The primary efficacy analysis set consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM with specified category.
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score\<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score = sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response or were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/colectomy before Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per Global Definition)
Participants with BF
|
2 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per Global Definition)
Participants without BF
|
15 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM with specified category.
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number \<=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]), without PGA. Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores rated 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8/ missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per US Definition)
Participants with BF
|
4 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per US Definition)
Participants without BF
|
16 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM with specified category.
Number of participants with endoscopic healing at week 8 by BF status were reported. Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). BF: Participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and either did not respond initially, responded initially but then lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants with BF
|
11 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants without BF
|
33 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM with specified category.
Clinical response: decrease from induction baseline in Mayo score by \>=30% and \>= 3 points, with either decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding subscore \>=1/ rectal bleeding subscore= 0/1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score =sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores =worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants with BF
|
44 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
95 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants without BF
|
56 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]) at Week 8 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)
|
25 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]) at Week 8 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)
|
10 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM.
Change from baseline in CRP concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=316 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=315 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 2
|
-0.01 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -2.79 to 1.21
|
-0.75 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -4.53 to 0.0
|
-0.92 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -6.24 to 0.05
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 4
|
-0.18 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -3.12 to 0.71
|
-1.08 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -5.86 to 0.0
|
-1.94 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -7.16 to -0.06
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 8
|
0.00 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -2.47 to 2.61
|
-1.30 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -5.04 to 0.3
|
-1.43 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -7.63 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study, with those participants who were having abnormal CRP at baseline.
Number of participants with normalized CRP (\<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal CRP (\>3 mg/L) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=185 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=185 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=199 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at Baseline
Week 4
|
41 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at Baseline
Week 8
|
39 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at Baseline
Week 2
|
36 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM.
Change from baseline in fecal lactoferrin concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=294 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=302 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=306 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 2
|
0.00 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -103.22 to 120.67
|
-4.67 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -140.04 to 75.46
|
-24.06 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -202.88 to 60.23
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 4
|
0.00 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -117.67 to 133.67
|
-29.26 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -203.79 to 46.29
|
-69.51 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -240.62 to 24.9
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 8
|
-4.71 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -149.28 to 92.9
|
-43.41 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -220.99 to 29.1
|
-101.46 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -301.23 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study, with those participants who had abnormal fecal lactoferrin at baseline.
Number of participants with normalized fecal lactoferrin (\<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal fecal lactoferrin (\> 7.24 mcg/g) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized fecal lactoferrin.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=280 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=291 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=294 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Lactoferrin (>7.24 mcg/g) at Baseline
Week 2
|
16 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Lactoferrin (>7.24 mcg/g) at Baseline
Week 4
|
16 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Lactoferrin (>7.24 mcg/g) at Baseline
Week 8
|
26 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM.
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=289 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=296 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=300 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 2
|
0.00 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -702.0 to 631.0
|
-29.00 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -933.5 to 492.0
|
-127.00 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -1029.5 to 433.5
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 4
|
-2.00 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -961.0 to 894.0
|
-223.00 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -1200.5 to 266.5
|
-485.50 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -1536.5 to 158.5
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration Through Week 8
Change at Week 8
|
-59.00 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -996.0 to 751.0
|
-431.50 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -1635.5 to 175.0
|
-715.50 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -1913.5 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all randomized participants in the induction study, with abnormal fecal calprotectin (\>250 mg/kg) at baseline.
Number of participants with normalized fecal calprotectin (\<=250 milligram per kilogram \[mg/kg) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal fecal calprotectin (\>250 mg/kg) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized fecal calprotectin.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=250 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=264 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=274 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Calprotectin (<=250 mg/kg) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at Baseline
Week 2
|
20 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Calprotectin (<=250 mg/kg) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at Baseline
Week 4
|
25 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Calprotectin (<=250 mg/kg) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at Baseline
Week 8
|
51 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study.
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing IBDQ score at either baseline or Week 8 were considered not to have achieved a greater than 20-point improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Number of Participants With a >20-point Improvement From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8
|
118 Participants
|
196 Participants
|
200 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified category.
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward and participants who had missing IBDQ dimension score at designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8
Bowel: Change at Week 8
|
5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.34
|
12.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.27
|
12.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.11
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8
Emotional: Change at Week 8
|
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.33
|
10.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.39
|
11.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.33
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8
Systemic: Change at Week 8
|
2.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.59
|
5.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.59
|
5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.65
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8
Social: Change at Week 8
|
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.55
|
5.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Based on scale scores, physical component summary (PCS: calculated from subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and mental component summary (MCS: calculated from subscales vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) scores were derived. Summary MCS and PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing component summary score at Week 8 had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Week 8
PCS: Change at Week 8
|
2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.39
|
4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.49
|
5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.16
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Week 8
MCS: Change at Week 8
|
2.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.20
|
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.63
|
5.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM.
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing individual scale at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=318 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Physical functioning: Change at Week 8
|
1.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.51
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Role-physical: Change at Week 8
|
2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.34
|
6.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.53
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Bodily pain: Change at Week 8
|
2.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.71
|
6.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.45
|
6.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.08
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
General health: Change at Week 8
|
1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.36
|
4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.74
|
4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.10
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Vitality: Change at Week 8
|
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.93
|
6.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.35
|
6.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.78
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Social functioning: Change at Week 8
|
3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.52
|
6.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.25
|
6.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.84
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Role-emotional: Change at Week 8
|
1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.04
|
4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.04
|
3.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.53
|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Mental health: Change at Week 8
|
2.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.86
|
4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.14
|
5.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM.
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=317 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Week 8
|
0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.182
|
0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.182
|
0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.172
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM.
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=317 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 8
|
5.71 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.584
|
13.64 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.394
|
13.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.447
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: PEAS consisted of all participants randomized in the induction study. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified category.
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward. Percentage of participants with various responses to the 5 dimensions were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=320 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=322 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Mobility:No change at Week 8
|
71.9 Percentage of Participants
|
71.8 Percentage of Participants
|
66.8 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Mobility:Worsened at Week 8
|
10.1 Percentage of Participants
|
11.9 Percentage of Participants
|
9.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Self-care:Improved at Week 8
|
5.4 Percentage of Participants
|
6.9 Percentage of Participants
|
7.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Anxiety/depression: Worsened at Week 8
|
17.7 Percentage of Participants
|
12.2 Percentage of Participants
|
10.9 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Mobility:Improved at Week 8
|
18.0 Percentage of Participants
|
16.3 Percentage of Participants
|
24.2 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Self-care:No change at Week 8
|
89.6 Percentage of Participants
|
88.4 Percentage of Participants
|
90.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Self-care:Worsened at Week 8
|
5.0 Percentage of Participants
|
4.7 Percentage of Participants
|
2.2 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Usual activities:Improved at Week 8
|
34.1 Percentage of Participants
|
49.5 Percentage of Participants
|
45.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Usual activities:No Change at Week 8
|
51.1 Percentage of Participants
|
40.4 Percentage of Participants
|
44.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Usual activities:Worsened at Week 8
|
14.8 Percentage of Participants
|
10.0 Percentage of Participants
|
10.9 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Pain/discomfort: Improved at Week 8
|
34.4 Percentage of Participants
|
44.2 Percentage of Participants
|
43.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Pain/discomfort: No Change at Week 8
|
49.8 Percentage of Participants
|
48.3 Percentage of Participants
|
48.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Pain/discomfort: Worsened at Week 8
|
15.8 Percentage of Participants
|
7.5 Percentage of Participants
|
8.4 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Anxiety/depression: Improved at Week 8
|
26.8 Percentage of Participants
|
33.5 Percentage of Participants
|
37.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Anxiety/depression: No Change at Week 8
|
55.5 Percentage of Participants
|
54.2 Percentage of Participants
|
51.6 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy , or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44
|
1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction Baseline and Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total Mayo score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44
|
-3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.34
|
-5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.27
|
-5.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Stool frequency subscore of Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Stool frequency scores: 0 =normal number of stools, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward or who had a missing Mayo subscores at a timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 16:1-2 stools more than normal
|
66 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 4: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
21 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 4: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 20:1-2 stools more than normal
|
55 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 24:Normal number of stools
|
50 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 24: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
31 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 28:Normal number of stools
|
52 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 32:1-2 stools more than normal
|
55 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 36: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
36 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 40:Normal number of stools
|
49 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 40: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
36 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 44:1-2 stools more than normal
|
53 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 28: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
36 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 4:Normal number of stools
|
56 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 4:1-2 stools more than normal
|
91 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
86 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 8:Normal number of stools
|
70 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 8:1-2 stools more than normal
|
69 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 8: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
22 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 8: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
14 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 12:Normal number of stools
|
62 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 12:1-2 stools more than normal
|
72 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 12: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
20 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 12: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
21 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 16:Normal number of stools
|
63 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 16: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
25 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 16: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
21 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 20:Normal number of stools
|
59 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 20: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
34 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 20: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
27 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 24:1-2 stools more than normal
|
63 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 24: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
31 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 28:1-2 stools more than normal
|
53 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 28: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
34 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 32:Normal number of stools
|
51 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 32: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
35 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 32: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
34 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 36:Normal number of stools
|
49 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 36:1-2 stools more than normal
|
52 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 36: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
38 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 40:1-2 stools more than normal
|
50 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 40: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
40 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 44:Normal number of stools
|
46 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 44: 3-4 stools more than normal
|
35 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Week 44: 5 or more stools more than normal
|
41 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The rectal bleeding subscore of the Mayo Score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Rectal bleeding scores: 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool \<half time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of time, and 3 = blood alone passed. Higher scores = worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing Mayo subscores at timepoint had last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 8: Obvious blood with stool most of time
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 12:No blood seen
|
141 Participants
|
144 Participants
|
149 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 16:Streaks of blood with stool < half time
|
24 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 20:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
31 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 36:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
30 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 40:No blood seen
|
105 Participants
|
132 Participants
|
147 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 40:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
33 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 44: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
30 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 4:No blood seen
|
149 Participants
|
148 Participants
|
143 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 4:Streaks of blood with stool < half time
|
20 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 4: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 4: Blood alone passed
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 8:No blood seen
|
139 Participants
|
151 Participants
|
141 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 8:Streaks of blood with stool < half time
|
27 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 8:Blood alone passed
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 12:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
21 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 12: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
10 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 12: Blood alone passed
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 16:No blood seen
|
134 Participants
|
145 Participants
|
150 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 16: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
13 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 16: Blood alone passed
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 20:No blood seen
|
120 Participants
|
141 Participants
|
144 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 20: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
19 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 20: Blood alone passed
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 24:No blood seen
|
114 Participants
|
139 Participants
|
144 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 24:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
32 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 24: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
23 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 24: Blood alone passed
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 28:No blood seen
|
114 Participants
|
141 Participants
|
147 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 28:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
26 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 28: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
28 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 28: Blood alone passed
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 32:No blood seen
|
109 Participants
|
138 Participants
|
147 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 32:Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
32 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 32: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
25 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 32: Blood alone passed
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 36:No blood seen
|
108 Participants
|
136 Participants
|
150 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 36: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
28 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 36: Blood alone passed
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 40: Obvious blood with stool most of the time
|
28 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 40: Blood alone passed
|
9 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 44:No blood seen
|
101 Participants
|
137 Participants
|
139 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 44::Streaks of blood with stool <half time
|
35 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
Week 44: Blood alone passed
|
9 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The endoscopy findings subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Endoscopy finding scores: 0 =normal/ inactive disease, 1 =mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 =moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 =severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Higher scores = worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing endoscopy subscores at timepoint had last available value for that subscore carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 44
Week 44: Normal or inactive disease
|
33 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 44
Week 44:Mild disease
|
21 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 44
Week 44: Moderate disease
|
40 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 44
Week 44: Severe disease
|
81 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The physician's global assessment subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Physician's global assessment scores: 0 = normal, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and who had a missing Mayo subscores at a timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 4:Normal
|
62 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 4:Mild disease
|
100 Participants
|
99 Participants
|
105 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 4: Moderate disease
|
12 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 4: Severe disease
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 8:Normal
|
65 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 8:Mild disease
|
90 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 8: Moderate disease
|
17 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 8:Severe disease
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 12:Normal
|
66 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 12:Mild disease
|
79 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 12: Moderate disease
|
26 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 12: Severe disease
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 16:Normal
|
67 Participants
|
82 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 16:Mild disease
|
68 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 16: Moderate disease
|
32 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 16: Severe disease
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 20:Normal
|
65 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 20:Mild disease
|
57 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 20: Moderate disease
|
41 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 20: Severe disease
|
12 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 24:Normal
|
54 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
91 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 24:Mild disease
|
61 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 24: Moderate disease
|
44 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 24: Severe disease
|
16 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 28:Normal
|
58 Participants
|
86 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 28:Mild disease
|
52 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 28: Moderate disease
|
47 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 28: Severe disease
|
18 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 32:Normal
|
55 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 32:Mild disease
|
52 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 32: Moderate disease
|
46 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 32: Severe disease
|
22 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 36: Normal
|
59 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 36:Mild disease
|
45 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 36: Moderate disease
|
47 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 36: Severe disease
|
24 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 40:Normal
|
57 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
91 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 40:Mild disease
|
48 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 40: Moderate disease
|
44 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 40: Severe disease
|
26 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 44:Normal
|
47 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 44:Mild disease
|
44 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 44:Moderate disease
|
57 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
Week 44: Severe disease
|
27 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing partial Mayo score at a time point had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 12
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 4
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 8
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 16
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 20
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 24
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 28
|
1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 32
|
1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 36
|
1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 40
|
1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 44
|
1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores; rated as 0 \[normal\] to 3 \[severe\]). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing partial Mayo score at a time point had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 4
|
-4.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
-4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 8
|
-4.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.68
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 12
|
-3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
-4.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 16
|
-3.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
-4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
-4.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 20
|
-3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
-4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 24
|
-3.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
-4.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 28
|
-3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
-4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
-4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 32
|
-2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
-4.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 36
|
-2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
-4.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 40
|
-2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
-3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
|
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
Change at Week 44
|
-2.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
-3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
-4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]) at Week 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of the Mayo subscores related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 44
|
49 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]) at Week 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo subscores related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 44
|
30 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal) and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission from the time of the event onward. Participants who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 44
|
79 Participants
|
107 Participants
|
119 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM with specified category.
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score \<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score =sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per Global Definition)
Participants with BF
|
15 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per Global Definition)
Participants without BF
|
27 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM with specified category.
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number \<=3, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore: 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore: 0(normal/ inactive disease) or 1(mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores: 0(normal) to 3(severe). BF: participants received 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab for treatment of UC, not responded initially/ responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medicines. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect /due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding and endoscopy) at Week 44 were not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used video of endoscopy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per US Definition)
Participants with BF
|
15 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per US Definition)
Participants without BF
|
28 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM with specified category.
Clinical response: decrease from IS baseline in Mayo score by \>=30% and \>=3 points, with either decrease from baseline in RB subscore \>=1/ RB subscore of 0/ 1. Mayo score have 4 subscores (SF, RB, endoscopy findings, PGA), rated 0(normal) to 3(severe). Total score=sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment: 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab for treating UC, no respond initially/responded initially but lost response/ medication intolerant. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsen UC before Week 44, had all 4 Mayo subscores miss at Week44/ lost clinical response at any time before Week44 were not in clinical response upto Week44. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants with BF
|
34 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants without BF
|
44 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM with specified category.
Number of participants with endoscopic healing at week 44 by BF status were reported. Endoscopic healing is improvement in endoscopic appearance of mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). BF: participants received treatment with 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and either did not respond initially, responded initially but then lost response, or were intolerant of medication. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy, or used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 or who had missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants with BF
|
20 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status
Participants without BF
|
30 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants who had achieved endoscopic healing at maintenance baseline.
Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=71 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=68 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=57 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Endoscopic Healing at Maintenance Baseline
|
25 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC.
Normal or inactive mucosal disease is defined as an endoscopy score of 0. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 44
|
32 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC with, participants who were receiving concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance baseline.
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score \<=2 points, with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated 0(normal) to 3(severe). Total score=sum of 4 subscores, range: 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 considered not to achieved OM of clinical remission and not receiving concomitant corticosteroids (corticosteroid-free clinical remission). Participants with all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 considered not in clinical remission. Participants missing value in corticosteroid use had their last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=91 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=82 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=92 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline (Per Global Definition)
|
17 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants who were receiving concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance baseline.
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number \<=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0(normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]), without PGA. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of Mayo components related to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in clinical remission. Participants with missing value in corticosteroid use had last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=91 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=82 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=92 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline (Per US Definition)
|
18 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline Through Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants who were receiving concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance baseline.
The change from maintenance baseline in average daily prednisone-equivalent (P.Eq) corticosteroid dose through Week 44 among the participants receiving concomitant corticosteroids other than budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate at maintenance baseline was reported. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward to that timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=75 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=69 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=82 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 4
|
-7.4 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 5.73
|
-7.8 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 5.48
|
-7.2 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 5.42
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 16
|
-10.1 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.73
|
-12.1 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.37
|
-12.8 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 6.98
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 20
|
-9.5 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.85
|
-12.0 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
-12.6 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.27
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 8
|
-10.8 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
-11.7 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.17
|
-12.1 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 6.81
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 12
|
-10.1 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.71
|
-11.6 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 9.16
|
-12.6 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.00
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 24
|
-8.9 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.96
|
-11.9 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
-12.5 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.88
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 28
|
-7.8 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.72
|
-11.5 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 9.23
|
-12.4 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.56
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 32
|
-7.7 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.18
|
-11.4 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.98
|
-12.1 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.21
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 36
|
-7.6 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.28
|
-11.3 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.80
|
-11.7 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.34
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 40
|
-7.2 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.04
|
-11.5 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
-11.5 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.37
|
|
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
Change at Week 44
|
-6.8 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 7.98
|
-11.0 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.87
|
-11.5 milligram per day (mg/day)
Standard Deviation 8.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC with, participants who were receiving concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance baseline.
Number of participants not receiving concomitant corticosteroids at Week 44 among participants who received concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance Baseline were reported. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 considered to be receiving concomitant corticosteroids at Week 44. Participants who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=91 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=82 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=92 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline
|
43 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants with \>20-point Improvement in IBDQ at the maintenance baseline.
IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as:10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had missing IBDQ score were considered not to have maintained improvement in IBDQ.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=129 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=144 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=143 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Who Maintained 20-point Improvement From Induction Baseline in IBDQ up to Week 44 Among Participants With a >20-point Improvement in IBDQ at Maintenance Baseline
|
64 Participants
|
95 Participants
|
102 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 20, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing IBDQ score at a timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Score at Week 20 and 44
Change at Week 20
|
-7.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.37
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.05
|
5.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.40
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Score at Week 20 and 44
Change at Week 44
|
-15.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.43
|
-3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.89
|
3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 20, and 44Population: PEAS included all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM for specified categories at specified timepoint.
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and participants who had missing IBDQ dimension score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Bowel:Change at Week 20
|
-3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.88
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.16
|
1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.56
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Bowel:Change at Week 44
|
-5.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
-1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.99
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.49
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Emotional: Change at Week 20
|
-1.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.16
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.12
|
2.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.56
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Emotional: Change at Week 44
|
-4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.84
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.17
|
1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.22
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Systemic: Change at Week 20
|
-1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.54
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.31
|
0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.24
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Systemic: Change at Week 44
|
-2.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.52
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.83
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Social: Change at Week 20
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.93
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.59
|
1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.44
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
Social: Change at Week 44
|
-2.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.72
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.10
|
1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Based on scale scores, PCS (calculated from subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and MCS (calculated from subscales vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) scores were derived. Summary MCS and PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had Week 0 value of IS carried forward from time of event onward and participants with missing component summary score at timepoint had last available value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Weeks 20 and 44
PCS: Change at Week 20
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.20
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.15
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.55
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Weeks 20 and 44
PCS: Change at Week 44
|
-1.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.14
|
1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.68
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Weeks 20 and 44
MCS: Change at Week 20
|
-1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.90
|
1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.91
|
0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.10
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Weeks 20 and 44
MCS: Change at Week 44
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.89
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and participants with missing individual scale score at timepoint had last available value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
General health:Change at Week 20
|
-0.95 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.468
|
0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.802
|
1.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.133
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Mental health:Change at Week 20
|
-1.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.085
|
1.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.631
|
0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.467
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Physical functioning: Change at Week 20
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.140
|
-0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.506
|
0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.809
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Physical functioning: Change at Week 44
|
-1.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.932
|
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.624
|
0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.819
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Role-physical: Change at Week 20
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.630
|
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.996
|
0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.144
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Role-physical: Change at Week 44
|
-2.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.400
|
-0.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.293
|
1.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.096
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Bodily pain:Change at Week 20
|
-2.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.081
|
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.556
|
1.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.971
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Bodily pain:Change at Week 44
|
-2.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.245
|
0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.340
|
0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.350
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
General health:Change at Week 44
|
-1.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.449
|
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.722
|
1.92 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.955
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Vitality:Change at Week 20
|
-1.71 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.876
|
0.74 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.917
|
0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.209
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Vitality:Change at Week 44
|
-3.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.389
|
0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.152
|
0.53 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.743
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Social functioning: Change at Week 20
|
-0.87 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.245
|
0.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.979
|
0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.907
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Social functioning: Change at Week 44
|
-1.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.186
|
0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.515
|
1.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.678
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Role-emotional: Change at Week 20
|
-0.93 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.586
|
0.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.338
|
0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.637
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Role-emotional: Change at Week 44
|
-2.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.187
|
0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.324
|
0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.199
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
Mental health:Change at Week 44
|
-2.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.992
|
0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.042
|
0.53 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.915
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing individual scale score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at Week 20
|
-0.036 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1535
|
-0.002 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1694
|
0.016 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1471
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at Week 44
|
-0.048 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1587
|
0.008 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1656
|
0.025 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1674
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 20 and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing VAS score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at Week 20
|
-4.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.70
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.29
|
2.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.80
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at Week 44
|
-7.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.75
|
-2.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.87
|
2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing individual scale score at timepoint had their last available value carried forward. Percentage of participants with various responses to the 5 dimensions were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Mobility:Worsened
|
15.0 Percentage of participants
|
12.2 Percentage of participants
|
8.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Self-care:Improved
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
|
4.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Self-care:Improved
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
|
2.3 Percentage of participants
|
4.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at Week (W) 20: Mobility:Improved
|
12.7 Percentage of participants
|
10.5 Percentage of participants
|
13.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Mobility:No change
|
75.7 Percentage of participants
|
79.1 Percentage of participants
|
78.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Mobility:Worsened
|
11.6 Percentage of participants
|
10.5 Percentage of participants
|
7.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Mobility:Improved
|
9.8 Percentage of participants
|
11.6 Percentage of participants
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Mobility:No change
|
75.1 Percentage of participants
|
76.2 Percentage of participants
|
79.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Self-care:No change
|
91.9 Percentage of participants
|
93.6 Percentage of participants
|
93.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Self-care:Worsened
|
6.4 Percentage of participants
|
4.7 Percentage of participants
|
2.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Self-care:No change
|
95.4 Percentage of participants
|
93.0 Percentage of participants
|
93.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Self-care:Worsened
|
2.9 Percentage of participants
|
4.7 Percentage of participants
|
2.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Usual activities:Improved
|
12.7 Percentage of participants
|
17.4 Percentage of participants
|
22.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Usual activities:No Change
|
64.2 Percentage of participants
|
66.9 Percentage of participants
|
64.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Usual activities:Worsened
|
23.1 Percentage of participants
|
15.7 Percentage of participants
|
13.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44: Usual activities:Improved
|
14.5 Percentage of participants
|
24.4 Percentage of participants
|
25.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Usual activities:No Change
|
52.6 Percentage of participants
|
55.2 Percentage of participants
|
62.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Usual activities:Worsened
|
32.9 Percentage of participants
|
20.3 Percentage of participants
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Pain/discomfort: Improved
|
16.8 Percentage of participants
|
22.1 Percentage of participants
|
23.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Pain/discomfort: No Change
|
54.9 Percentage of participants
|
58.7 Percentage of participants
|
58.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Pain/discomfort: Worsened
|
28.3 Percentage of participants
|
19.2 Percentage of participants
|
17.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Pain/discomfort: Improved
|
17.9 Percentage of participants
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
|
30.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Pain/discomfort: No Change
|
46.2 Percentage of participants
|
55.8 Percentage of participants
|
50.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Pain/discomfort: Worsened
|
35.8 Percentage of participants
|
19.2 Percentage of participants
|
18.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Anxiety/depression: Improved
|
16.2 Percentage of participants
|
20.3 Percentage of participants
|
24.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Anxiety/depression: No Change
|
62.4 Percentage of participants
|
61.6 Percentage of participants
|
58.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 20:Anxiety/depression: Worsened
|
21.4 Percentage of participants
|
18.0 Percentage of participants
|
17.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Anxiety/depression: Improved
|
17.9 Percentage of participants
|
20.3 Percentage of participants
|
26.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Anxiety/depression: No Change
|
56.1 Percentage of participants
|
58.7 Percentage of participants
|
58.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
Change at W 44:Anxiety/depression: Worsened
|
26.0 Percentage of participants
|
20.9 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC, with participants whose mucosal healing status was determined at Week 44 with evaluable biopsy.
Mucosal healing included EH and HH. EH: endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]). HH: neutrophil infiltration in \<5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, no erosions/ ulcerations/ granulation tissue. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44/ missing endoscopy score/ missing any component of histologic healing (i.e. assessment of neutrophils in crypts, crypt destruction/ erosions/ ulcerations/ granulations) at Week 44 and had unevaluable biopsy (biopsy collected but could not assessed due to sample preparation/ technical errors) at Week 44, but who did not achieve endoscopic healing, considered not to have mucosal healing. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=170 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=170 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 44
|
41 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
Change from Maintenance baseline in CRP concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 8
|
0.05 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -0.67 to 0.81
|
-0.03 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -0.92 to 0.37
|
-0.04 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -1.5 to 0.92
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 24
|
0.68 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -0.28 to 2.34
|
0.13 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -0.75 to 1.16
|
-0.03 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -1.53 to 0.59
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 44
|
1.07 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval 0.0 to 5.18
|
0.38 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -0.35 to 1.53
|
-0.07 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Interval -1.73 to 0.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
Change from Maintenance baseline in fecal lactoferrin concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 8
|
0.0 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -44.8 to 72.0
|
0.0 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -35.0 to 48.5
|
-1.4 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -52.0 to 30.9
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 24
|
2.2 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -45.3 to 139.9
|
-0.8 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -47.9 to 35.1
|
-2.3 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -65.5 to 25.5
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 44
|
0.8 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -34.2 to 177.4
|
-1.9 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -54.4 to 35.1
|
-9.1 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -101.6 to 7.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44Population: PEAS consisted of all participants who were in clinical response to IV ustekinumab induction and were randomized at Week 0 of the maintenance study to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w, or placebo SC. Here, n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were analyzed for this OM at specified timepoint.
Change from Maintenance baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Induction Study (IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=175 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=172 Participants
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6 mg/kg IV
n=176 Participants
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 8
|
0.0 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -158.0 to 557.0
|
-18.5 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -368.5 to 225.5
|
-31.0 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -380.0 to 205.0
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 24
|
125.0 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -97.0 to 1223.0
|
-31.5 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -413.5 to 385.0
|
-46.0 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -530.0 to 318.0
|
|
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change at Week 44
|
229.5 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -102.5 to 1387.0
|
-37.5 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -476.0 to 274.0
|
-85.0 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Interval -742.0 to 166.0
|
Adverse Events
Induction Study(IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6mg/kg IV
IS: Placebo-Nonresponders at Week 8
IS: Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8
Maintenance Study(MS): Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 12 Weeks (q12w)
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 8 Weeks (q8w)
MS: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
MS: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders(IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Long Term Extension (LTE): Placebo SC
LTE: Placebo SC to Ustekinumab SC 90 mg q8w
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w to 90 mg SC q8w
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w to 90 mg SC q8w
LTE: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
LTE: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders (IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Induction Study(IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=321 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6mg/kg IV
n=320 participants at risk
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Placebo-Nonresponders at Week 8
n=184 participants at risk
Participants who did not achieve clinical response to placebo IV at Week 8 and received a single IV infusion of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at Week 8. Included data from Week 8 onward through the final safety visit.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8
n=233 participants at risk
Participants who did not achieve clinical response to ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 and received a single dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC along with matching placebo IV (to maintain the blind). Participants with clinical response at Week 16 (that is, delayed responders) were eligible to enter Maintenance study, but were not be randomized. Included data from Week 8 onward through the final safety visit.
|
Maintenance Study(MS): Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)
n=175 participants at risk
Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab who were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 12 Weeks (q12w)
n=172 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 8 Weeks (q8w)
n=176 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
n=103 participants at risk
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
MS: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders(IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
n=157 participants at risk
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
Long Term Extension (LTE): Placebo SC
n=115 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and received placebo SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of long term extension (LTE).
|
LTE: Placebo SC to Ustekinumab SC 90 mg q8w
n=56 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and had a dose adjustment from placebo SC to ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) during the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w
n=141 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w to 90 mg SC q8w
n=64 participants at risk
Participants who received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) completed the maintenance Week 44 visit and benefited from continued treatment entered the LTE period, and received ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 48 until Week 220.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w
n=143 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w to 90 mg SC q8w
n=37 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and had a sham dose adjustment to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w during the LTE.
|
LTE: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
n=73 participants at risk
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders (IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
n=116 participants at risk
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental Status Changes
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron Deficiency Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary Artery Disease
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Hydrocele
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness Neurosensory
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness Unilateral
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Detachment
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal Fissure
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorectal Disorder
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis Ulcerative
|
3.4%
11/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
5/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
4/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.6%
8/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.5%
7/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colon Dysplasia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea Haemorrhagic
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal Ulcer
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterovesical Fistula
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal Hernia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestinal Obstruction
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestine Perforation
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestine Polyp
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mesenteric Fibrosis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal Varices Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis Acute
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pseudopolyposis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Intestinal Obstruction
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Subileus
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical Hernia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Non-Cardiac Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis Acute
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Drug-Induced Liver Injury
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver Disorder
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic Reaction
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal Abscess
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium Difficile Infection
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Complicated Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus Colitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus Infection
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Salmonella
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis C
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Human Herpesvirus 6 Infection
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Listeriosis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral Herpes
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periorbital Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal Abscess
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngeal Abscess
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Legionella
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Viral
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salpingitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salpingo-Oophoritis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous Abscess
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Abscess
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bladder Injury
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Clavicle Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Jaw Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar Vertebral Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus Injury
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural Intestinal Perforation
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal Compression Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic Fracture
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic Metabolic Decompensation
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Failure to Thrive
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Enthesopathy
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral Disc Protrusion
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rotator Cuff Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sacroiliitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal Cell Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bowen's Disease
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon Adenoma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon Cancer
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colorectal Cancer
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic Adenoma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Intraductal Papilloma of Breast
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lentigo Maligna
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian Adenoma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pituitary Tumour Benign
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate Cancer
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal Adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal Adenoma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal Cancer
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin Papilloma
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Testis Cancer
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive Disorder
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalised Tonic-Clonic Seizure
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic Stroke
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Motor Dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Optic Neuritis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion Spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional State
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Kidney Injury
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus Bladder
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic Kidney Disease
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Glomerulonephritis Chronic
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Colic
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Incontinence
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian Cyst
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiectasis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hyperventilation
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Embolism
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Eosinophilia
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pyoderma Gangrenosum
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep Vein Thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Extremity Necrosis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vasculitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Induction Study(IS): Placebo Intravenous (IV)
n=319 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of placebo as intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week (W) 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received weight-range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg IV + placebo SC at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) IV
n=321 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Approximately 6mg/kg IV
n=320 participants at risk
Participants received weight range based dose of ustekinumab approximating 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ustekinumab 260 mg \[body weight \<=55 kg\], 390 mg \[body weight \>55 kg but ≤85 kg\] and 520 mg \[body weight \>85 kg\]), as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 received 1 dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC+ placebo IV at Week 8. At Week 16, participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 8 were re-evaluated for clinical response. Participants with clinical response at Week 16 were eligible to enter the maintenance study. Participants who did not achieve clinical response at Week 16 were not eligible to enter the maintenance study and had a safety follow-up visit up to 20 weeks after their last dose of study agent.
|
IS: Placebo-Nonresponders at Week 8
n=184 participants at risk
Participants who did not achieve clinical response to placebo IV at Week 8 and received a single IV infusion of ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at Week 8. Included data from Week 8 onward through the final safety visit.
|
IS: Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8
n=233 participants at risk
Participants who did not achieve clinical response to ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 and received a single dose of ustekinumab 90 mg SC along with matching placebo IV (to maintain the blind). Participants with clinical response at Week 16 (that is, delayed responders) were eligible to enter Maintenance study, but were not be randomized. Included data from Week 8 onward through the final safety visit.
|
Maintenance Study(MS): Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)
n=175 participants at risk
Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab who were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 12 Weeks (q12w)
n=172 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Ustekinumab 90mg SC Every 8 Weeks (q8w)
n=176 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab (ie, 130 mg IV or approximately 6 mg/kg IV) at Week 0 of the induction study and were in clinical response at induction Week 8 and participants who were randomized to receive placebo at Week 0 of the induction study and were not in clinical response at induction Week 8 but were in clinical response at induction Week 16 after receiving a dose of IV ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg) at induction Week 8 (placebo to ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44.
|
MS: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
n=103 participants at risk
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
MS: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders(IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
n=157 participants at risk
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks, beginning at Week 0 of maintenance study through Week 44 (non-randomized participants).
|
Long Term Extension (LTE): Placebo SC
n=115 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and received placebo SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of long term extension (LTE).
|
LTE: Placebo SC to Ustekinumab SC 90 mg q8w
n=56 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive placebo SC in the maintenance study and had a dose adjustment from placebo SC to ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) during the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w
n=141 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w to 90 mg SC q8w
n=64 participants at risk
Participants who received ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 12 weeks (q12w) completed the maintenance Week 44 visit and benefited from continued treatment entered the LTE period, and received ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 48 until Week 220.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w
n=143 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) in the maintenance study and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC at the first dosing visit (Week 48) of the LTE.
|
LTE: Ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w to 90 mg SC q8w
n=37 participants at risk
Participants who were randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and had a sham dose adjustment to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w during the LTE.
|
LTE: Placebo IV (IS - Responders) to Placebo SC
n=73 participants at risk
Participants with clinical response to Induction Week 0 treatment with placebo IV received placebo SC in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
LTE: Ustekinumab Delayed Responders (IS) to UST 90mg SC q8w
n=116 participants at risk
Participants who were delayed responders to ustekinumab induction (were not in clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg \[IV\]) at Week 8 but were in clinical response at Week 16, after receiving ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8) and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w in the maintenance study and the LTE through Week 200 (non-randomized participants).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
5/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.2%
5/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
4/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.4%
11/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.2%
7/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
8/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.2%
4/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.9%
12/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.1%
7/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.7%
9/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.7%
9/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
3/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.1%
3/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
4/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Distension
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
5/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
3/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
2.8%
9/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
8/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
5/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
6/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.5%
8/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.2%
5/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
10.5%
15/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
5/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
2/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis Ulcerative
|
2.5%
8/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
5/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
5/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
3/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
27.4%
48/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
11.0%
19/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
9.1%
16/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
24.3%
25/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
14.6%
23/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
20.0%
23/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
19.6%
11/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
24.1%
34/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
31.2%
20/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
25.9%
37/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
35.1%
13/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
37.0%
27/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
25.9%
30/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.93%
3/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.8%
6/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
6/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
9.1%
13/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.8%
9/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent Bowel Movements
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.93%
3/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.2%
7/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
8/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.2%
7/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
3/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
3/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.2%
5/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.3%
9/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
5/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.93%
3/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
3/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.2%
6/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.6%
5/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
6/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
8/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
4/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza Like Illness
|
0.63%
2/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
5/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Erythema
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Swelling
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.9%
6/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
6/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.5%
8/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.9%
5/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.2%
5/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
3/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.0%
7/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic Steatosis
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.9%
5/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.8%
6/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
3/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.0%
7/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.2%
6/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
4/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear Infection
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.63%
2/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.2%
5/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.9%
8/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
5/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
2/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.6%
8/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.7%
10/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.8%
6/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.5%
7/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
4/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
6/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.0%
10/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.2%
6/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.8%
9/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
13/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
18/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.8%
7/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
16.0%
28/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
18.0%
31/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
14.8%
26/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
12.6%
13/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
12.1%
19/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
14.8%
17/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
23.2%
13/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
20.6%
29/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
15.6%
10/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
18.9%
27/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
32.4%
12/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.8%
5/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
27.6%
32/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral Herpes
|
1.6%
5/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.94%
3/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.2%
6/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
2/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.1%
3/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.93%
3/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
5/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
8/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
4/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.2%
6/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
1.3%
4/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
6/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
5/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
5/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.6%
8/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
9.1%
16/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.5%
7/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.2%
6/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.5%
12/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.2%
4/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
11.9%
17/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.6%
10/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.93%
3/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.94%
3/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
4/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.2%
6/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Heat Illness
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Sprain
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
0.63%
2/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
6/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
12.5%
7/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
4/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased
|
0.63%
2/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.94%
3/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.9%
5/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Alkaline Phosphatase Increased
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
2/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Phosphorus Decreased
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Stool Analysis Abnormal
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.1%
3/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron Deficiency
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.8%
4/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D Deficiency
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.57%
1/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.94%
3/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
6/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
2/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
9.7%
17/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
9.3%
16/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.7%
10/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.7%
9/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
10.2%
16/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.2%
6/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.4%
9/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.8%
5/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.7%
11/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.6%
10/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
1.3%
4/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.2%
5/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
5/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
10.7%
6/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.0%
7/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.9%
7/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.8%
5/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.2%
6/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
2/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.4%
14/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.9%
22/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.1%
13/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
2/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.4%
11/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
10.2%
18/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.7%
9/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.1%
7/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
6.4%
9/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
7.7%
11/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
9.5%
11/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
2/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
2/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.3%
4/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
1/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.94%
3/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.94%
3/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
4/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.3%
5/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.9%
5/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.9%
7/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
4/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
8/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.0%
7/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.64%
1/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
5.0%
7/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.94%
3/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
2/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
1.6%
5/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.62%
2/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.43%
1/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
5/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Papule
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
1.3%
4/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.5%
8/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.94%
3/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.58%
1/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.1%
2/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
2/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.71%
1/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.31%
1/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.93%
3/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.2%
4/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.54%
1/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.86%
2/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
6/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
6/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.3%
2/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.4%
2/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.2%
6/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Lesion
|
0.00%
0/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.70%
1/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.6%
5/319 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.31%
1/321 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/320 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/184 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/233 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/175 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.3%
4/172 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.7%
3/176 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
3/157 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
0.87%
1/115 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/141 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
3.5%
5/143 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
4.1%
3/73 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
2.6%
3/116 • Up to Week 220
The safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, including partial dose, according to actual treatment received.
|
Additional Information
Senior Director Clinical Development
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER