Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of JNJ-54861911 in Participants in the Early Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum (NCT NCT02406027)
NCT ID: NCT02406027
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Results Overview
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 3 years that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. An serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
90 participants
Up to 3 years
2025-04-29
Participant Flow
Participants who completed their treatment period as described under the parent protocol in study 54861911ALZ2002 (NCT02260674) or any ongoing/future Phase 1b or Phase 2 atabecestat clinical study were enrolled in this study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
STARTED
|
35
|
29
|
26
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
Asymptomatic at Risk
|
6
|
8
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
Prodromal
|
29
|
21
|
20
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
COMPLETED
|
29
|
26
|
22
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
3
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
14
|
26
|
22
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
14
|
26
|
22
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
Physician Decision
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1)
Subject Refused Further Study Treatment
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
Study Terminated by Sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
7
|
24
|
19
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
At Spouse Request With PI Agreement
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase (Period 2)
Subject not Compliant to Study Procedure
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of JNJ-54861911 in Participants in the Early Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Total
n=90 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.15 • n=5 Participants
|
71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.04 • n=7 Participants
|
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.87 • n=5 Participants
|
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.06 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
BELGIUM
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
FRANCE
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
NETHERLANDS
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
SWEDEN
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 3 yearsPopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 3 years that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. An serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase(Period 1): Atabecestat, 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Number of Participants with TEAEs
|
22 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Number of Participants with Serious TEAEs
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Double-blind (DB) Day 1 and DB Week 52Population: The Double-blind (DB) Safety Analysis Set included all participants (asymptomatic at risk and prodromal at baseline) who received study treatment during Period 1. Here 'n' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at a given time point.
CSF samples were obtained for measuring levels of different ABeta fragments such as ABeta 1-37, ABeta 1-38, ABeta 1-40, and ABeta 1-42. ABeta fragments of different length produced by cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by beta-secretase (BACE) and gamma-secretase complex in brain and excreted into CSF. Participants were classified as asymptomatic at risk: cognitively and functionally normal (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score \[CDR\] =0), but with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage AD (preclinical stage); and prodromal: had some limited cognitive impairment (CDR =0.5), and still functionally normal, with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage (predementia) AD, but had as of yet no dementia (predementia stage). Here, 'Number analyzed=0' signifies that either CSF concentration was below lower limit of quantification for assay or sample was collected under parent study 54861911ALZ2002 (NCT02260674).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase(Period 1): Atabecestat, 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-37: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-9.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.32
|
-65.4 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
-90.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-37: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
6.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 10.09
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-37: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
-8.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation 17.75
|
-62.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 11.02
|
-65.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 23.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-38: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-9.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.02
|
-42.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 17.49
|
-83.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 4.84
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-38: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
10.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 15.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-38: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
-9.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 16.52
|
-58.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 10.21
|
-70.4 Percent change
Standard Deviation 23.53
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-40: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-9.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 6.12
|
-46.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 18.22
|
-84.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 5.43
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-40: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
8.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 17.19
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-40: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
-14.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 20.48
|
-60.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.52
|
-72.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation 22.30
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-42: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-10.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.81
|
-39.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 24.28
|
-76.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 11.01
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-42: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
8.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.44
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-37, 1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
CSF ABeta 1-42: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
-15.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 20.51
|
-52.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 11.60
|
-57.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 31.42
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, DB Day 1 and DB Week 52Population: The Double-blind (DB) Safety Analysis Set included all participants (asymptomatic at risk and prodromal at baseline) who received study treatment during Period 1. Here 'n' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at a given time point.
The CSF samples were obtained for measuring levels of different soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP) fragments (sAPP-alpha, sAPP-beta). Participants were classified as asymptomatic at risk: cognitively and functionally normal (CDR score =0), but with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage alzheimer's disease (AD) (preclinical stage); and prodromal: had some limited cognitive impairment (CDR =0.5), and still functionally normal, with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage (predementia) AD, but had as of yet no dementia (predementia stage). Here, 'Number analyzed=0' signifies that either CSF concentration was below lower limit of quantification for assay or sample was collected under parent study 54861911ALZ2002 (NCT02260674).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase(Period 1): Atabecestat, 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein (sAPP) Fragments (sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta) Levels
CSF sAPP-alpha: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-4.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 12.78
|
50.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.67
|
77.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein (sAPP) Fragments (sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta) Levels
CSF sAPP-alpha: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
0.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 24.97
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein (sAPP) Fragments (sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta) Levels
CSF sAPP-alpha: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
-11.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 14.01
|
60.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 24.03
|
85.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 39.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein (sAPP) Fragments (sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta) Levels
CSF sAPP-Beta: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-10.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
-57.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
-90.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein (sAPP) Fragments (sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta) Levels
CSF sAPP-Beta: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
0.4 Percent change
Standard Deviation 18.93
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein (sAPP) Fragments (sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta) Levels
CSF sAPP-Beta: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
-11.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 14.47
|
-63.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 5.19
|
-73.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 21.79
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, DB Day 1, DB Week 24, and DB Week 52Population: The Double-blind (DB) Safety Analysis Set included all participants (asymptomatic at risk and prodromal at baseline) who received study treatment during Period 1. Here 'n' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at a given time point.
Plasma samples were obtained for measuring levels of different ABeta fragments such as ABeta 1-38, ABeta 1-40, ABeta 1-42. ABeta fragments of different length were produced by cleavage of APP by beta-secretase (BACE) and gamma-secretase complex in different peripheral tissues, including white blood cells and were measured in plasma. Participants classified as asymptomatic at risk: cognitively and functionally normal (CDR score =0), but with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage AD (preclinical stage); and prodromal: had some limited cognitive impairment (CDR =0.5), and still functionally normal, with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage (predementia) AD, but had as of yet no dementia (predementia stage). Here, 'Number analyzed=0' signifies that either CSF concentration was below lower limit of quantification for assay or sample was collected under parent study 54861911ALZ2002 (NCT02260674).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase(Period 1): Atabecestat, 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-38:Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 24
|
-9.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-38: Asymptomatic at Risk:DB Week 52
|
-5.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-38: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
-5.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 10.07
|
—
|
-6.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.56
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-38: Prodromal: DB Week 24
|
3.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 24.32
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-38: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
20.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation 35.48
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-40: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Day 1
|
19.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
-4.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
4.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 40.27
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-40:Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 24
|
-2.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation 12.38
|
-75.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 10.16
|
-82.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 5.59
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-40:Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
0.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 10.85
|
-74.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
-80.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.60
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-40: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
2.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 15.48
|
25.8 Percent change
Standard Deviation 66.03
|
-24.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 41.31
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-40: Prodromal: DB Week 24
|
8.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 18.57
|
-68.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
-82.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.38
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-40: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
10.5 Percent change
Standard Deviation 17.09
|
-70.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
-75.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation 22.15
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-42: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Day 1
|
-5.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-42:Asymptomatic at Risk:DB Week 24
|
-7.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation 9.33
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-42:Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-6.0 Percent change
Standard Deviation 2.69
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-42: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
-1.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 5.54
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-42: Prodromal: DB Week 24
|
15.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 17.15
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Amyloid Beta (ABeta) (1-38, 1-40, 1-42) Levels
Plasma ABeta 1-42: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
5.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, DB Day 1 and DB Week 52Population: The Double-blind (DB) Safety Analysis Set included all participants (asymptomatic at risk and prodromal at baseline) who received study treatment during Period 1. Here 'n' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at a given time point.
The CSF samples were obtained for measuring levels of Tau protein and phosphorylated (p)-tau protein. Participants were classified as asymptomatic at risk: cognitively and functionally normal (CDR score =0), but with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage AD (preclinical stage); and prodromal: had some limited cognitive impairment (CDR =0.5), and still functionally normal, with biomarker pattern consistent with early stage (predementia) AD, but had as of yet no dementia (predementia stage). Here, 'Number analyzed=0' signifies that either CSF concentration was below lower limit of quantification for assay or sample was collected under parent study 54861911ALZ2002 (NCT02260674).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase(Period 1): Atabecestat, 25 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau Protein and Phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) Protein Level
CSF Tau Protein: Asymptomatic at Risk: DB Week 52
|
-1.4 Percent change
Standard Deviation 14.10
|
3.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 15.04
|
22.4 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau Protein and Phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) Protein Level
CSF Tau Protein: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
6.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 6.82
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau Protein and Phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) Protein Level
CSF Tau Protein: Prodromal: DB Week 52
|
13.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 45.55
|
2.1 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.82
|
1.4 Percent change
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau Protein and Phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) Protein Level
CSF p-Tau Protein: Asymptomatic at Risk:DB Week 52
|
-4.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 6.47
|
-4.9 Percent change
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
8.3 Percent change
Standard Deviation NA
Here NA signifies that Standard Deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau Protein and Phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) Protein Level
CSF p-Tau Protein: Prodromal: DB Day 1
|
-0.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 7.81
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau Protein and Phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) Protein Level
CSF p-Tau Protein: Prodromal: Week 52
|
2.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 12.93
|
-2.7 Percent change
Standard Deviation 10.52
|
-2.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 8.52
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 25 mg
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 25 mg
n=26 participants at risk
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
n=15 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
n=14 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
n=26 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
n=22 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burns Third Degree
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniocerebral Injury
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic Vertebral Fracture
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist Fracture
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic Enzyme Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot Deformity
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic Disorder
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus Urinary
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Colic
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric Obstruction
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Placebo
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 10 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Period 1): Atabecestat 25 mg
n=26 participants at risk
Participants received 25 mg of atabecestat orally, once daily from Day 1 up to Week 52 in the Double-blind treatment phase.
|
Open-label (OL) Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 5 mg
n=15 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Placebo to Atabecestat 25 mg
n=14 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving placebo in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 10 mg to Atabecestat 5 mg
n=26 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 10 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase, received 5 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
OL Phase (Period 2): Atabecestat 25 mg to Atabecestat 25 mg
n=22 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving atabecestat 25 mg in the Double-blind treatment phase continued to receive 25 mg atabecestat orally, once daily until registration of atabecestat or any safety issue in Open-label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Intraocular Pressure Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
17.1%
6/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular Fibrosis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
9.1%
2/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous Floaters
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
14.3%
2/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum Intestinal
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal Hernia
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.9%
2/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess Neck
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial Blepharitis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candida Infection
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dermatophytosis of Nail
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Viral
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.7%
2/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.9%
2/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
21.4%
3/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
11.5%
3/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.9%
2/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Periorbital Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon Rupture
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic Enzyme Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
21.4%
3/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases Increased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.9%
2/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Investigations
Weight Decreased
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
13.6%
3/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal Cell Carcinoma
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin Papilloma
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
9.1%
2/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
14.3%
2/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
11.5%
3/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension Headache
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional State
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressive Symptom
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.9%
2/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
9.1%
2/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nightmare
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Actinic Keratosis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hair Colour Changes
|
5.7%
2/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail Discolouration
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
2.9%
1/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
4.5%
1/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Seborrhoeic Dermatitis
|
5.7%
2/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
5.7%
2/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.8%
1/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/35 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/29 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/26 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
0.00%
0/22 • Up to 3 years
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study (during Period 1 and 2).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER