Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effect of Daily Next Science™ Acne Gel (NAG) on Mild to Moderate Facial Acne (NCT NCT02404285)
NCT ID: NCT02404285
Last Updated: 2023-11-08
Results Overview
Percent change in number of Inflammatory lesions with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks of use.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
68 participants
Baseline until 12 weeks
2023-11-08
Participant Flow
Subjects were enrolled in the study after signing informed consent and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria per protocol. A Washout period of 2-3 weeks was initiated for subjects discontinuing topical acne or systemic acne treatment respectively to normalize by washing their face twice a day with the study facial cleansing soap.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vehicle
Subjects will be treated with once daily vehicle and will attend screening, randomization, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits. The following will be assessed:
1. Lesions will be counted and right, left and forward facing photographs will be taken
2. Investigator Global Assessment
3. Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire
4. Treatment Area Assessment by Investigator
Vehicle: Subjects will be instructed to apply a thin layer of the product to the entire face every evening after washing with Cetaphil cleanser and gently patting the skin dry. Product should not be applied around the eyes or near the mucous membranes. No other acne treatments will be applied to the face during study participation. Hands should be washed following application of study gel.
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
Subjects will be treated with once daily NAG and will attend screening, randomization, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits. The following will be assessed:
1. Lesions will be counted and right, left and forward facing photographs will be taken
2. Investigator Global Assessment
3. Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire
4. Treatment Area Assessment by Investigator
Next Science Acne Gel: Subjects will be instructed to apply a thin layer of the product to the entire face every evening after washing with Cetaphil cleanser and gently patting the skin dry. Product should not be applied around the eyes or near the mucous membranes. No other acne treatments will be applied to the face during study participation. Hands should be washed following application of study gel.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
33
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
31
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effect of Daily Next Science™ Acne Gel (NAG) on Mild to Moderate Facial Acne
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and attended screening, randomization, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits. The following was assessed:
1. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
2. Investigator Global Assessment
3. Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire
4. Treatment Area Assessment by Investigator
Vehicle: Subjects were instructed to apply a thin layer of the product to the entire face every evening after washing with Cetaphil cleanser and gently patting the skin dry. Product should was not to be applied around the eyes or near the mucous membranes. No other acne treatments was applied to the face during study participation.
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and attended screening, randomization, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits. The following was assessed:
1. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
2. Investigator Global Assessment
3. Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire
4. Treatment Area Assessment by Investigator
Next Science Acne Gel: Subjects were instructed to apply a thin layer of the product to the entire face every evening after washing with Cetaphil cleanser and gently patting the skin dry. Product should was not to be applied around the eyes or near the mucous membranes. No other acne treatments was applied to the face during study participation.
|
Total
n=68 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: Subjects who completes all visits.
Percent change in number of Inflammatory lesions with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks of use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Inflammatory Lesions With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks of Use.
|
-27 % change of inflammatory lesions count
Standard Error 12.5
|
-44 % change of inflammatory lesions count
Standard Error 8.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPercent Change in Number of Non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) were counted after 12 weeks of either Vehicle of NAG treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts After 12 Weeks of Treatment.
|
-6.5 % Change Non-inflammatory lesion count
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
-34.1 % Change Non-inflammatory lesion count
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksChange in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score (0-5) with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. IGA score is worse at 5, with improvement at lower scores (best at 0).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Final Investigator Global Assessment Score With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
2.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error .08
|
2.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error .09
|
|
Final Investigator Global Assessment Score With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean after 12 Weeks
|
2.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: The Next Science Acne Gel had average erythema score decreasing from 0.5 to 0.3 for the Acne Gel and to 0.5 to 0.4 for the Vehicle Control (not shown).
Change in Erythema (measure of redness) scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks.Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Erythema Scores With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
.5 Average Score on a scale
Standard Deviation .8
|
.5 Average Score on a scale
Standard Deviation .7
|
|
Change in Erythema Scores With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean after 12 weeks
|
0.4 Average Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
0.3 Average Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: NAG application yielded Dryness average scores decreasing from 0.3 to 0.1 over 12 weeks compared to no decrease in the Vehicle control (0.3 to 0.3).
Change in Dryness score with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Dryness With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
.3 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .5
|
.3 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .5
|
|
Change in Dryness With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean after 12 Weeks
|
0.3 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: NAG application resulted in average Burning or Stinging scores increasing from 0.0 to 0.1 over 12 weeks, compared to a decrease in Vehicle Control from 0.1 to 0.0.
Change in Burning/Stinging scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Burning/Stinging With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .3
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Change in Burning/Stinging With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean after 12 Weeks
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
0.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: NAG application resulted in average scores remaining between 0.1 and 0.0 for all time points for both NAG and Vehicle groups.
Change in Erosion scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Erosion With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Change in Erosion With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean after 12 Weeks
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: NAG application resulted in average scores decreasing from 0.1 to 0.0 for the Acne Gel, and from 0.2 to 0.1 for the Vehicle Control.
Change in Edema scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Edema With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
.2 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .4
|
0.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .3
|
|
Change in Edema With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean after 12 Weeks
|
0.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: NAG and vehicle application yielded average pain scores decreasing from 0.1 to 0.0.
Change in Pain scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .2
|
.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .4
|
|
Change in Pain With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at 12 Weeks
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: NAG application resulted in Itching scores of 0.1 to 0.0 for the Acne Gel and from 0.2 to 0.0 for the Vehicle Control.
Change in Itching scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. Treatment area evaluation scoring system ranges from 0-3, with 0 being Absent (none) and 3 being Severe (intense, marked presence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Itching With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
.2 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .5
|
.1 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation .3
|
|
Change in Itching With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at 12 Weeks
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
0 Average score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: The average self-perception score for NAG users increased from 4.1 to 5.0.
Change in Self Perception scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. The Acne Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Form was used to determine the practical improvements in quality of life. The Acne-QoL form is a validated measure that contains 19 questions referring to the past week, organized into four area: self-perception, role-social, role-emotional, and acne symptoms. Each question gauges how much acne affects the subject, with answers ranging from 0 (extremely) to 6 (not at all). Domain scores are calculated by taking the average scores within each domain, with high scores reflecting better QoL determination. The number of subjects with a negative score for each quality of life region was determined at each time-point. Those with a negative score, were those with a score of 3.5 or less, indicating that the disease was having a meaningful effect on their lives.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Self Perception With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
3.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Self Perception With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at 12 Weeks
|
4.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
5.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksChange in Role-Emotional scores with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. At baseline and each subsequent visit, subjects completed the Acne-QoL form after being given verbal instructions by the study coordinator. The Acne QoL is a validated measure that contains 19 questions referring to the past week, organized into four areas: self-perception, role-social, role-emotional, and acne symptoms. Each question gauges how much acne affects the subject, with answers ranging from 0 (extremely) to 6 (not at all). Domain scores are calculated by taking the average scores within each domain, with high scores reflecting better QoL determination. The number of subjects with a negative score for each quality of life region was determined at each time-point. Those with a negative score, were those with a score of 3.5 or less, indicating that the disease was having a meaningful effect on their lives
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Role Emotional With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
3.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
3.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Role Emotional With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at 12 Weeks
|
4.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
4.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksChange in the subjects perception of their acne symptoms with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. At baseline and each subsequent visit, subjects completed the Acne-QoL form after being given verbal instructions by the study coordinator. The Acne QoL is a validated measure that contains 19 questions referring to the past week, organized into four areas: self-perception, role-social, role-emotional, and acne symptoms. Each question gauges how much acne affects the subject, with answers ranging from 0 (extremely) to 6 (not at all). Domain scores are calculated by taking the average scores within each domain, with high scores reflecting better QoL determination. The number of subjects with a negative score for each quality of life region was determined at each time-point. Those with a negative score, were those with a score of 3.5 or less, indicating that the disease was having a meaningful effect on their lives
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Perceived Acne Symptoms With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
3.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Perceived Acne Symptoms With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at 12 Weeks
|
4.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
4.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until 12 weeksPopulation: The average Role-Social score increased from 4.5 to 5.3.
Change in subjects social response to their acne with daily use of NAG compared with vehicle after 12-weeks. At baseline and each subsequent visit, subjects completed the Acne-QoL form after being given verbal instructions by the study coordinator. The Acne QoL is a validated measure that contains 19 questions referring to the past week, organized into four areas: self-perception, role-social, role-emotional, and acne symptoms. Each question gauges how much acne affects the subject, with answers ranging from 0 (extremely) to 6 (not at all). Domain scores are calculated by taking the average scores within each domain, with high scores reflecting better QoL determination. The number of subjects with a negative score for each quality of life region was determined at each time-point. Those with a negative score, were those with a score of 3.5 or less, indicating that the disease was having a meaningful effect on their lives
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 Participants
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and the following was assessed at baseline, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits:
1\. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Role Social With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at Baseline
|
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
4.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Change in Quality of Life - Role Social With Daily Use of NAG Compared With Vehicle After 12-weeks.
Mean at 12 Weeks
|
4.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
5.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
Adverse Events
Vehicle
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=33 participants at risk
Subjects were treated with once daily vehicle and attended screening, randomization, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits. The following was assessed:
1. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
2. Investigator Global Assessment
3. Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire
4. Treatment Area Assessment by Investigator
Vehicle: Subjects were instructed to apply a thin layer of the product to the entire face every evening after washing with Cetaphil cleanser and gently patting the skin dry.
|
NAG (Next Science Acne Gel)
n=35 participants at risk
Subjects were treated with once daily NAG and attended screening, randomization, 2,4,8 and 12 week visits. The following was assessed:
1. Lesions were counted and right, left and forward facing photographs were taken
2. Investigator Global Assessment
3. Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire
4. Treatment Area Assessment by Investigator
Next Science Acne Gel: Subjects were instructed to apply a thin layer of the product to the entire face every evening after washing with Cetaphil cleanser and gently patting the skin dry.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
0.00%
0/35 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Gastritis
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
0.00%
0/35 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Vomiting
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
0.00%
0/35 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Haemtoma
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
0.00%
0/35 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • 12 Weeks.
|
0.00%
0/35 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
General aches
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Mild celiac disease
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Abdominal cramps
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cough
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Infection
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis Media
|
0.00%
0/33 • 12 Weeks.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • 12 Weeks.
|
0.00%
0/35 • 12 Weeks.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place