Feasibility Study of Photovaporisation of Prostate With a Limitated Length of Catheterization of 3 Hours

NCT ID: NCT02401581

Last Updated: 2021-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-02

Study Completion Date

2021-06-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Benign hypertrophy of the prostate (BPH) is the most frequent pathology in the urinary tract of middle-aged men. In recent years, to enable BPH treatment with larger volumes and to reduce the risk of hemorrhage known to be associated to the transurethral resection of prostate treatment, transurethral photovaporisation of the prostate (PVP ) with the GreenLight (GL) XPS 180 W was developed. Therefore, the question arises to maximally reduce the length of catheterization to facilitate outpatient surgical management of prostate adenoma.

In the investigators study, the investigators propose to evaluate the failure rate of an early removal of the catheter 3 hours post-operative after a PVP procedure with GL 180 W/XPS in selected patients on general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. To this end, the investigators realize a national multicenter prospective study including 300 patients. The effectiveness of this model of management is defined by absence of a need for re-catheterization in the post -operative period of 24 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rate of early removal of the catheter

In our study, we propose to evaluate the failure rate of an early removal of the catheter 3 hours post-operative after a PVP procedure with GL 180 W/XPS in selected patients on general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia for limiting autonomic effects on the bladder and ensure fastest possible recovery of voiding .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Catheter

Intervention Type OTHER

The effectiveness of this model of management is defined by absence of a need for re-catheterization in the post -operative period of 24 hours, indications for resondage being cases of acute urinary retention (AUR ) or macroscopic hematuria necessitating a washes with drainage . Patients are followed for a period of 3 months with a post-operative visit at 30 days and a last follow-up visit at 90 days during which the effectiveness is evaluated by conventional means of clinical indicators ( flowmetry , postvoid residue, volumetry of the prostate , IPSS scores , QoL , EVA, IIEF ... ).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter

The effectiveness of this model of management is defined by absence of a need for re-catheterization in the post -operative period of 24 hours, indications for resondage being cases of acute urinary retention (AUR ) or macroscopic hematuria necessitating a washes with drainage . Patients are followed for a period of 3 months with a post-operative visit at 30 days and a last follow-up visit at 90 days during which the effectiveness is evaluated by conventional means of clinical indicators ( flowmetry , postvoid residue, volumetry of the prostate , IPSS scores , QoL , EVA, IIEF ... ).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS )
2. IPSS≥ 15 despite medical treatment \> 1 month if monotherapy or \> 3 months if bitherapie OR acute urinary retention ( RAU ) non-medical after the 1st failure to remove the catheter OR acute prostatitis OR macroscopic haematuria of prostatic origin
3. prostate volume \> 30 cc by transrectal ultrasonography ;
4. IPSS Qol ≥ 3 has at inclusion ;
5. PSA ≤ 4 ng / ml ;
6. if PSA between 4 and 10 then PSA L/T ≥25 % or negative PBP \<6 months .
7. Accommodation \<50 km;
8. company available for the return at home and monitoring first post- operative night .
9. patient sign the informed consent
10. patient covered by social security or other health insurance

Exclusion Criteria

1. post- voiding residue \> 250 cc by suprapubic ultrasound not older than \< 45 days
2. prostate volume \> 100 cc by transrectal ultrasound not older than 45 days
3. urological antecedents : o urethral stenosis or cervical disease

* UTI in progress
* SAD patient or self-catheterization
* obstructive hydronephrosis + / - renal failure
* vesical calculi
* cancer of the prostate treated or untreated
* bladder tumor associated
* Interstitial cystitis ( symptom or biopsy)
4. antecedent of the prostate surgery
5. neurologic bladder ( parkinsonian syndrome , multiple sclerosis , lupus, neuropathy, Diabetic, cauda equina syndrome )
6. criteria related concomitant medications that can not be stopped at least \< 48 hours before PVP with GL XPS 180 W
7. contra indication for outpatient care for medical reason
8. contra indication of a product analgesic according to protocol
9. patient inability to understand and sign the informed consent as well as completing the questionnaires
10. ASA Score \> 3 .
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

DURAND Matthieu, Ph

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Service d'Urologie, CHU de Nice

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CH Grasse - urologie

Grasse, Alpes-maritimes, France

Site Status

CHU de Nice - Urologie

Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France

Site Status

CH privé St Brieuc

Saint-Brieuc, Cote D'armor, France

Site Status

APHM - Urologie - Hôpital Conception

Marseille, PACA, France

Site Status

CHRU Tours

Tours, Vendée, France

Site Status

CHU Brest Urologie

Brest, , France

Site Status

CHU Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHU Limoges -Urologie - Hôpital Dupuytren

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique les Bleuets

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

AP-HP - Urologie Hôpital Tenon

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Monsouris urologie

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-PP-07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.