Medtronic Reveal LINQ™ In-Office 2 (RIO 2) Study United States
NCT ID: NCT02395536
Last Updated: 2017-10-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
525 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-30
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In office Outside walls of hospital
Reveal LINQ insertions will be performed in office setting. The in office setting was defined as a procedure or office room with controlled entry and hard floors outside the walls of the hospital and not an ambulatory surgery center.
office setting
An office setting was defined as a procedure or office room with controlled entry and hard floors outside the walls of the hospital and not including ambulatory surgical centers
Traditional Hospital Setting
Reveal LINQ insertions will be performed in a traditional setting. The traditional hospital setting includes an operating room or electrophysiology laboratory.
hosptial setting
A hospital setting was defined as an operating room or electrophysiology lab inside the walls of a hospital.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
office setting
An office setting was defined as a procedure or office room with controlled entry and hard floors outside the walls of the hospital and not including ambulatory surgical centers
hosptial setting
A hospital setting was defined as an operating room or electrophysiology lab inside the walls of a hospital.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient is 18 years of age or older
3. Patient is willing to undergo ICM insertion procedure outside of the cath lab, OR, EP lab setting with only local anesthetic
4. Patient is willing and able to provide consent and authorize the use and disclosure of health information
5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol including the required follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient has reduced immune function or is otherwise at high risk for infection per physician discretion
3. Current therapy with immunosuppressive agents or chronic steroid use e.g. Prednisone greater than 20mg per day
4. Patient requires hemodialysis
5. Patient with active malignancy or history of chemotherapy or radiation treatment Patient has had a recent (within 30 days) or an active infection including but not limited to pneumonia, urinary tract, cellulitis, or bacteremia.
6. Patient has had major surgery (in the past 6 months)
7. Patient has undergone a procedure which required central venous or intraarterial access (e.g. AF/VT ablation, EP study, coronary angio) within the last 3 months or is scheduled for such a procedure while enrolled in the study.
8. Prior history of surgical infection, prosthetic device infection, or endovascular infection, including endocarditis, in the past 12 months.
9. Patient has a central venous port, an atrio-venous fistula, or a prosthetic valve
10. Patient requires conscious or moderate sedation to receive LINQ™
11. Patient is already implanted with a loop recorder
12. Patient is implanted or indicated for implant with a pacemaker, ICD, CRT device
13. Patient is enrolled in another study that could confound the results of this study, without documented pre-approval from a Medtronic study manager.
14. Patient's life expectancy is less than 6 months
15. Patient is pregnant
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scripps Green Hospital
La Jolla, California, United States
Saint Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Mission Viejo, California, United States
Regional Cardiology Associates (Sacramento CA)
Sacramento, California, United States
Colorado Heart and Vascular, PC
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
Cardiac Arrhythmia Service
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants - Clearwater Office
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Jim Moran Heart & Vascular-Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Tallahassee Research Institute Inc
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants
Macon, Georgia, United States
Saint Elizabeth Healthcare
Edgewood, Kentucky, United States
Delmarva Heart Research Foundation Inc
Salisbury, Maryland, United States
Sparrow Clinical Research Institute
Lansing, Michigan, United States
Cardiology Associates of North Mississippi
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
Mid America Heart Institute (MAHI)
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Lester E Cox Medical Center
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Lourdes Cardiology Services
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States
Northwell Health
Great Neck, New York, United States
The Mount Sinai Medical Center (New York NY)
New York, New York, United States
Cone Health Medical Group HeartCare at Church Street
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Raleigh Cardiology Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Oklahoma Heart Institute
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Diagnostic Cardiology Group
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Amarillo Heart Group
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Austin, Texas, United States
Baylor Research Institute (Dallas TX)
Dallas, Texas, United States
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rogers JD, Piorkowski C, Sohail MR, Anand R, Kowalski M, Rosemas S, Stromberg K, Sanders P. Resource utilization associated with hospital and office-based insertion of a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: results from the RIO 2 randomized US study. J Med Econ. 2020 Jul;23(7):706-713. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1746548. Epub 2020 May 1.
Rogers JD, Sanders P, Piorkowski C, Sohail MR, Anand R, Crossen K, Khairallah FS, Kaplon RE, Stromberg K, Kowal RC. In-office insertion of a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: Results from the Reveal LINQ In-Office 2 randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Feb;14(2):218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Version 1.0, 23 January 2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id