A 24-week, Multicenter, proSpective stUdy to Evaluate the PASI 90 Clinical Response Rate and the Safety PRofile of sEcukinuMab 300 mg in Cw6-negativE and Cw6-positive Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis (SUPREME)

NCT ID: NCT02394561

Last Updated: 2019-04-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

434 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-10

Study Completion Date

2017-06-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A study to evaluate the differences in the efficacy and safety of secukinumab between Cw6-negative and Cw6-positive patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Biological agents represent the most advanced type of treatment for psoriasis. Secukinumab is a human monoclonal anti IL-17A antibody that binds to human IL-17A and neutralizes its bioactivity by inhibiting IL17A produced by both Th17 cells and those of the innate immune system, thus providing complete anti IL17A blockage. Targeting IL-17A has the potential to reduce autoimmune inflammation while leaving other immune functions undisturbed. While targeting of Th1-promoting or Th17-promoting cytokines affects critical mediators such as IFN-γ, IL-22 and IL-21, selective targeting of IL-17A leaves these Th1/17 activities, as well as certain protective functions of innate cells intact. Furthermore, as a fully human monoclonal antibody, secukinumab should reduce immunogenic risks compared to current or emerging antibody therapies that are not fully human.

Many recent studies have shown that highly selective biologic drugs are not effective in every patient and that variations in the genome can be associated with different clinical responses or side effects to a given drug. The PSORS1 locus on chromosome 6p is generally understood to confer the most risk for psoriasis. A specific allele for this locus, HLA C\*06, is present in about 60% of psoriatic patient cases. Data linking secukinumab efficacy to a particular genetic marker are lacking.

Recent research has revealed a marked difference in the proportion of PASI 90 achievers at 12 weeks between Cw6-positive and Cw6-negative patients (85.7% vs 56.5%) treated with ustekinumab (Talamonti M et al. 2013) and a greater efficacy of anti-TNFα drugs in CW6 negative patients (Galli et al. 2013).Unlike anti-IL-12/23 agents, secukinumab inhibits IL-17 produced by both Th17 cells after presentation by antigen presenting cells (in this case Cw6) and cells of the innate immune system whose activation does not require antigen presentation. Providing a drug that is equally effective on both Cw6-negative and Cw6-positive patients would be an important clinical accomplishment and would eliminate the need for costly HLA-Cw6 tests. The choice of a cohort study would therefore seem appropriate for this clinical context.

The purpose of this study was to explore the different efficacy and safety profile of secukinumab 300 mg in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis, stratified for the presence of HLA-C\*06, whose determination was blinded for patients and investigators. The study was conducted both on anti-TNFα-naïve and anti-TNFα failure patients and also stratified for TNFα - 308 polymorphism, BMI, smoking and metabolic syndrome, among others.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Plaque Type Psorisis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Arms represent stratification of Cw6 positive and Cw6 negative patients
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cw6-positive AIN457 300 mg

Stratified to Cw6 positive cohort. Investigators and patients were blinded to Cw6 results. All patients were treated according to an induction regimen of two injections of secukinumab 150 mg a week for five weeks starting at baseline (week 0), followed by a maintenance period of two injections per month. At week 16, patients achieving PASI 50 response were eligible to continue on secukinumab for an additional 8 weeks in CORE. Eligible patients with at least a PASI 75 response were included in the extension phase, up to 72 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Secukinumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Secukinumab was supplied as 150 mg solution in pre-filled syringe for subcutaneous injection

Cw6-negative AIN457 300 mg

Stratified to Cw6 negative cohort. Investigators and patients were blinded to Cw6 results. All patients were treated according to an induction regimen of two injections of secukinumab 150 mg a week for five weeks starting at baseline (week 0), followed by a maintenance period of two injections per month. At week 16, patients achieving PASI 50 response were eligible to continue on secukinumab for an additional 8 weeks in CORE. Eligible patients with at least a PASI 75 response were included in the extension phase, up to 72 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Secukinumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Secukinumab was supplied as 150 mg solution in pre-filled syringe for subcutaneous injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Secukinumab

Secukinumab was supplied as 150 mg solution in pre-filled syringe for subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AIN457

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject must have been able to understand and communicate with the investigator and to comply with the requirements of the study and must have given a written, signed and dated informed consent before any study related activity was performed.
2. Men or women at least 18 years of age at time of screening.
3. Diagnosis of moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis for at least 6 months (including concomitant psoriatic arthritis as per the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria \[CASPAR\]).
4. Moderate to severe psoriasis as defined at enrollment by:

* PASI score ≥ 10 or
* PASI score \> 5 but \< 10 and DLQI ≥10
5. Patients that are candidates for systemic therapy, whether treatment naïve or after failed response to other systemic therapy (i.e. cyclosporine, methotrexate and PUVA) or to an anti-TNFα (or is intolerant and/or has a contraindication to these).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type (e.g., pustular, erythrodermic and guttate psoriasis).
2. Cyclosporine or methotrexate therapy within 4 weeks prior to Day 1.
3. Anti-TNFα therapy within timelines depending on drug half-life.
4. Previous exposure to secukinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or the IL-17 receptor.
5. Previous exposure to ustekinumab or any other biologic drug for the treatment of psoriasis that was not anti-TNFα therapy.
6. Intravenous or intramuscular steroids within 2 weeks prior to screening and during screening.
7. Ongoing use of corticosteroid topical treatments or UV therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, (MI), Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ancona, AN, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

L’Aquila, AQ, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bari, BA, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bergamo, BG, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Benevento, BN, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bologna, BO, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brindisi, BR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brescia, BS, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cagliari, CA, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chieti, CH, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Catania, CT, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Catanzaro, CZ, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Florence, FI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Genova, GE, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Grosseto, GR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lecce, LE, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Terracina, LT, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lucca, LU, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Macerata, MC, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Messina, ME, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mantova, MN, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Modena, MO, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Padua, PD, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Perugia, PG, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pisa, PI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Parma, PR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pavia, PV, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Siena, SI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Torino, TO, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Erice, TP, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Terni, TR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Trieste, TS, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Udine, UD, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Verona, VR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAIN457AIT01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.