Efficacy of Interferential Therapy in Chronic Constipation (CON-COUR)
NCT ID: NCT02381665
Last Updated: 2015-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The first line therapy of chronic constipation is based on medical treatment combined with laxatives and dietary rules. However, these treatments are often disappointing. In case of failure, few treatment options are currently available. Surgery can sometimes be discussed for intractable chronic constipation. Sub-total colectomy can be proposed in case of STC but is associated with a significant morbidity. In case of pelvic floor disorders, a specific surgical treatment can be indicated. However, surgery is invasive, has a significant morbidity and the results are inconsistent. Recently, some studies have assessed the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic constipation with some success, but this technique is expensive and requires the surgical implantation of a medical device . More recent works, including a randomized trial have showed, in children, the efficacy of interferential current stimulation in the treatment of chronic transit constipation . This treatment is used daily, at home, and uses four adhesive surface electrodes, two abdominal (placed below the costal margin) and two paraspinal (placed between T9 and L2) producing two sinusoidal currents crossing the body, 1 hour per day for 1-3 months. To date, only one open-label study has evaluated this technique in adults and has shown encouraging results in three months with an efficiency on 7/11 patients (63.6%) in the number of stools, severity score of constipation, quality of life's score associated with improved bowel transit time measured by radio-markers.
Interferential therapy is a new treatment that has demonstrated its efficiency in the treatment of chronic constipation in children. Our team has published the first and only pilot study in adults that also demonstrated encouraging results. These data are of particular interest since laxative treatments are often disappointing, are expensive and may have adverse events.
This study would be the first randomized study to evaluate a non-invasive and non-pharmacological treatment of chronic constipation in adults.
If its effectiveness is demonstrated, it will provide, for the first time, a new non-invasive step for patients with laxative treatment failure before considering surgical treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Long-Course Treatment Using Vibrating Capsules for Chronic Constipation
NCT06553664
Evaluating the Synergism of Soluble Dietary Fiber With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Slow Transit Constipation
NCT02291354
Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of RM-131 Administered to Patients With Chronic Constipation
NCT01781104
Evaluation of the Effect of Chicory Inulin-type Fructans in Constipated Adults
NCT05447481
Freeze-dried vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Slow Transit Constipation
NCT02676388
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Patient enrolled in this group will receive a device for effective interferential current stimulation.
Flexstim IF
Patient enrolled will receive a device for effective interferential current stimulation
Group B
Patient enrolled in this group will receive a device that does not deliver current stimulation
Flexstim IF faked
Patient enrolled will receive a sham device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Flexstim IF
Patient enrolled will receive a device for effective interferential current stimulation
Flexstim IF faked
Patient enrolled will receive a sham device.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* two or fewer spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week for a minimum of 6 months before the screening visit\*
* or as a sensation of incomplete evacuation or straining during defecation with at least 25% bowel movements\*
* Subject with chronic constipation lasting for more than 6 months
* Subject with chronic constipation refractory to medical treatment for at least 3 months (failure or intolerance of medical treatment)
* Subject have to interrupt any laxative treatment but during the study, patients are allowed, in case of absence of bowel movements for 3 or more consecutive days, to take up 15 mg of bisacodyl (Dulcolax, Boerhinger Ingelheim) as rescue medication
* Subjects affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security system
* Subjects who have signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject with chronic constipation secondary to anorectal malformations, to colorectal or anal organic lesions or to a pelvic floor disorder considered by the investigator as necessitating a surgical treatment (rectal prolapse exteriorized, rectocele, enterocele)
* Subjects with current implanted cardiac pacemakers, defibrillators, cardiac pumps, spinal stimulators or other implanted electronic devices
* Subject with chronic constipation secondary to drug, to neurologic, endocrine or metabolic disorders
* Subject with a history of partial colectomy
* Subject with megacolon, megarectum, colonic inertia
* Skin lesions preventing the installation of the electrodes
* Women without effective contraception (hormonal or intra-uterine device)
* Subject misunderstanding the written and spoken French
* Subject participating in another biomedical research protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Urielle DESALBRES
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vitton V, Mion F, Leroi AM, Brochard C, Coffin B, Zerbib F, Damon H, Melchior C, Duboc H, Queralto M, Baumstarck K. Interferential therapy for chronic constipation in adults: The CON-COUR randomizedcontrolled trial. United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Apr 25;11(4):337-49. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12373. Online ahead of print.
Vitton V, Benezech A, Honore S, Sudour P, Lesavre N, Auquier P, Baumstarck K. CON-COUR study: Interferential therapy in the treatment of chronic constipation in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 May 28;16:234. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0752-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-A01359-38
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2014-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.