Hemoglobin and INR Out of Nose Blood

NCT ID: NCT02370381

Last Updated: 2015-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nose bleeding (epistaxis) is a common emergency. It is often difficult to estimate blood loss and the current hemoglobin of patients. In patients with oral anticoagulation, it is important to measure the level of hemodilution. Several situations with the importance of the fast determination of these parameters have been identified in previous studies \[1,2\]. The blood sampling from the venous punction is the standard in these investigations. However, this requires the corresponding painful puncture and also the time required at the laboratory.

Since many patients present themselves with active bleeding, it is obvious that this blood could be used for determining the following parameters: Hemoglobin and INR/Quick. The nose blood can be analyzed with commercial rapid test devices. If these devices could generate same or similar results and after further validation of the method, painful punctures could be waived.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with active epistaxis are verbally elucidated about the study and the verbal consent is obtained. According to the agreement a few drops of nose blood are preserved. Subsequently the standard therapy is performed. This blood sample is promptly analyzed with the rapid test devices.

We successfully applied the exception to the analysis of blood samples prior to obtaining the written consent due to following reasons: Analysis with the rapid test devices needs to be immediate and without delay in order to satisfy quality standards prescribed by the manufacturers. In addition, patient's treatment should not be delayed.

Simultaneously, a venous blood sample for the corresponding values is carried out according to medical indications. After the treatment of the acute emergency and thus after the greatest stress situation, we ask the patient again whether he agrees to the study conditions. The written consent is obtained in the end of the acute treatment.

Both inception and termination of the research project will be reported within 90 days of the Ethics Committee.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epistaxis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epistaxis

Patients with active anterior epistaxis

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with active nose bleeding
* Indication for routine blood sampling
* Aged 18 to 99 years
* Verbal informed consent before implementation takes place
* Written consent of the participating person after investigation and completion of treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* No active bleeding
* Routine blood sampling for medical reasons not indicated
* Lack of understanding of the study or investigation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Soyka, Dr. med.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ORL USZ

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zurich University Hospital

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Soyka MB, Holzmann D. Should we test the prothrombin time in anticoagulated epistaxis patients? Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2013 Spring;4(1):e52-3. doi: 10.2500/ar.2013.4.0049.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23772329 (View on PubMed)

Murer K, Ahmad N, Roth BA, Holzmann D, Soyka MB. THREAT helps to identify epistaxis patients requiring blood transfusions. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jan 31;42(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-42-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23663751 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SM_16_02_2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id