Calcific Tendinitis: Comparing Minimally Invasive Modalities

NCT ID: NCT02367560

Last Updated: 2020-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Calcific tendinitis is a common and challenging problem in the orthopedic surgeon's office. The chronic and variable course of the condition can lead to dissatisfaction with conservative management. Current standard of care at the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre is referral for treatment by either needle decompression therapy by a radiologist or shockwave therapy by a physiotherapist. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacies of these treatment options.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Calcific tendinitis is a common and challenging problem in the orthopedic surgeon's office. The chronic and variable course of the condition can lead to dissatisfaction with conservative management. Current guidelines recommend conservative management initially and failing this, a variety of minimally invasive options exist. These include subacromial steroid injection (SSI), needle decompression (ND), and Shock wave therapy (SWT).

Few trials of these methods exist, but generally a benefit is seen with all minimally invasive methods. Most promising results have occurred with needle decompression and shockwave therapy. To date, no direct trials comparing SWT and ND have been published.

The purpose of this trial is to preliminarily establish the comparative efficacies of NDSSI and SWT using a number of outcome measures. Secondarily, the investigators aim to determine prognostic factors for success of minimally invasive therapies. The results of this study will serve as a foundation for more rigorous trials in this area.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Calcific Tendinitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NDSSI

Participants in this arm of the trial will be referred for Needle decompression with subacromial steroid (Depo medrol) injection (NDSSI) as their treatment for calcific tendinitis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Needle decompression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Direct manipulation of calcium deposits in the shoulder with a needle to fragment the deposit performed by a radiologist.

Depo medrol

Intervention Type DRUG

Subacromial steroid injection (40 mg depo medrol) is given to the patient to limit irritation following needle decompression.

SWT

Participants in this arm of the trial will be referred for Shockwave therapy (SWT) using an Ultrasound device, delivered by a physiotherapist, as their treatment for calcific tendinitis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shockwave therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A physiotherapist performs the shockwave therapy procedure. Treatment is completed in 4 weekly sessions. Treatment involves applying soundwaves directly to the affected shoulder area using an ultrasound device.

Ultrasound device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultrasound device is applied directly to the shoulder at 0.2 mJ/mm2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Needle decompression

Direct manipulation of calcium deposits in the shoulder with a needle to fragment the deposit performed by a radiologist.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Shockwave therapy

A physiotherapist performs the shockwave therapy procedure. Treatment is completed in 4 weekly sessions. Treatment involves applying soundwaves directly to the affected shoulder area using an ultrasound device.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Depo medrol

Subacromial steroid injection (40 mg depo medrol) is given to the patient to limit irritation following needle decompression.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ultrasound device

Ultrasound device is applied directly to the shoulder at 0.2 mJ/mm2.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

methylprednisolone acetate Injectable Suspension

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* New diagnosis of symptomatic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder
* Seeking treatment for diagnosis
* ≥ 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Pre-existing diagnosis of rotator cuff tear or arthropathy
* Previous minimally invasive or surgical therapy
* Systemic Inflammatory disease
* Blood dyscrasia
* Peripheral neuropathy
* Active Workplace Safety \& Insurance Board (WSIB) claim for shoulder injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lakehead University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jubin Payandeh

Orthopedic Surgeon, Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jubin Payandeh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jubin Payandeh, MD

Role: CONTACT

(807) 344-1123

Aaron Burkhart, MD

Role: CONTACT

807-767-7677

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shalyn L Littlefield, MSc

Role: primary

807-684-6608

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RP-336-10202014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.