2D Versus 3D Laparoscopic Training on a Virtual Reality Simulator
NCT ID: NCT02361463
Last Updated: 2018-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Training With Laser Guidance Trial
NCT02407483
Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software
NCT06255080
Varied Practice on LAPSIM
NCT05731674
The FEEDBACK Trial, a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01497782
Off-site Training in Laparoscopy
NCT02243215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3D group
Will practice under 3D vision conditions on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator
3D vision
Laparoscopic simulator training to proficiency under 3D conditions
2D group
Will practice under 2D vision conditions on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator
2D vision
Laparoscopic simulator training to proficiency under 2D conditions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3D vision
Laparoscopic simulator training to proficiency under 3D conditions
2D vision
Laparoscopic simulator training to proficiency under 2D conditions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Experience with laparoscopy surgery (having performed minimum one laparoscopic procedure as primary surgeon, including supervised procedures).
3. Performing more than 3 supervised laparoscopy surgeries during the intervention.
4. Performing laparoscopy surgery between the intervention and the retention test 3-6 weeks after.
5. No informed consent.
6. Does not speak Danish on a conversational level.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen
Master student / B.M.Sc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen, B.M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre for Clinical Education
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Clinical Education
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, McDougall EM, Landman J. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):261-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0344. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF. Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1):110-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9253-6.
Smith R, Schwab K, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1453-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9601. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
Alaraimi B, El Bakbak W, Sarker S, Makkiyah S, Al-Marzouq A, Goriparthi R, Bouhelal A, Quan V, Patel B. A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy. World J Surg. 2014 Nov;38(11):2746-52. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2674-0.
Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, Witte M, Leiner U, Muhlbach L, Ruschin D, Reiner W, Feussner H. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D. Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2387-97. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E. Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
Mistry M, Roach VA, Wilson TD. Application of stereoscopic visualization on surgical skill acquisition in novices. J Surg Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;70(5):563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 20.
Sorensen SMD, Konge L, Bjerrum F. 3D vision accelerates laparoscopic proficiency and skills are transferable to 2D conditions: A randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2017 Jul;214(1):63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.