Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety, PD & Efficacy of MT-3724 for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL (NCT NCT02361346)
NCT ID: NCT02361346
Last Updated: 2022-08-18
Results Overview
The MTD is defined to be the dose cohort below which participants experience dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1. Dose-limiting toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
38 participants
Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12
2022-08-18
Participant Flow
This 4-part study evaluated safety, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of MT-3724 in participants with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Part 1 was multiple ascending dose study and Parts 2, 3 and 4 were multi-center, multinational, open-label, single-arm evaluation of MT-3724 administered as monotherapy in repeat doses.
A total of 27 participants were enrolled in Parts 1 and 2 and 11 participants in Part 3. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately. The study was terminated as no participants in Part 3 showed a response and the potential risks outweighed potential benefit.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort either received 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 3
MT-3724 was administered at a dose of 50μg/kg/dose via IV infusion for all participants
|
Part 4
Participants in this arm were planned to receive all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2 ( Up to Day 112)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1 and 2 ( Up to Day 112)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1 and 2 ( Up to Day 112)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
0
|
|
Part 4 (Up to Day 112)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 4 (Up to Day 112)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 4 (Up to Day 112)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort either received 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 3
MT-3724 was administered at a dose of 50μg/kg/dose via IV infusion for all participants
|
Part 4
Participants in this arm were planned to receive all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2 ( Up to Day 112)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1 and 2 ( Up to Day 112)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
Disease progression (radiographic per lugano)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
0
|
|
Part 3 (Up to Day 112)
Clinical disease progression
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety, PD & Efficacy of MT-3724 for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 3: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
n=11 Participants
MT-3724 was administered at a dose of 50µg/kg/dose via IV infusion for all participants
|
Part 4: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
Participants in this arm were planned to receive all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle
|
Total
n=38 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
73.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43 • n=5 Participants
|
70.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.74 • n=7 Participants
|
64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.01 • n=5 Participants
|
57.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.66 • n=4 Participants
|
65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.24 • n=21 Participants
|
67.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.40 • n=8 Participants
|
59.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58 • n=8 Participants
|
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.77 • n=24 Participants
|
—
|
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.90 • n=42 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
—
|
20 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
—
|
18 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
—
|
34 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
—
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12Population: Safety Set comprises of all participants who received any amount of MT-3724
The MTD is defined to be the dose cohort below which participants experience dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1. Dose-limiting toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of a Single Cycle of MT-3724
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2 : Days 1, 3 and 12Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS). All subjects from the Safety Set with sufficient serum concentration data to determine the primary PK parameters. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints were analyzed. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the determination of Cmax of MT-3274.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=1 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=7 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=9 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Maximum Observed Concentrations (Cmax) of MT-3274
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Days 1, 3 and 12Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the determination of tmax.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Time to Achieve Cmax (Tmax) of MT-3724
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hours
Median and Full Range could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Days 1, 3 and 12Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the determination of AUC (0-4), AUC (0-infinity) and AUClast.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 4 Hours (AUC [0-4]), AUC (0-infinity) and AUC From Dosing to Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of MT-3724
AUC (0-4)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 4 Hours (AUC [0-4]), AUC (0-infinity) and AUC From Dosing to Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of MT-3724
AUC (0-infinity)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 4 Hours (AUC [0-4]), AUC (0-infinity) and AUC From Dosing to Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of MT-3724
AUClast
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA h*ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Days 1, 3 and 12Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Part 2 was analyzed as a single-arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of t1/2 of MT-3724.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Half Life (t1/2) of MT-3724
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Days 1, 3 and 12Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Vz of MT-3724.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution (Vz) of MT-3724
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Days 1, 3 and 12Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of CL of MT-3724.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Clearance (CL) of MT-3724
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
NA Liters per hour
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Mean and Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Cycle 1: Days 8 and 23; Cycle 3: Day1; Cycle 5: Day 1 and Day 120 (end of study)Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
CD19+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Absolute Values of Cluster of Differentiation 19 Plus (CD19+) for B-cell Lymphocytes
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
67.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
134 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
60.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
1170 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation 1965.6
|
—
|
34.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Absolute Values of Cluster of Differentiation 19 Plus (CD19+) for B-cell Lymphocytes
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
114 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
325 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
244 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
57.7 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation 91.166
|
—
|
126 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Absolute Values of Cluster of Differentiation 19 Plus (CD19+) for B-cell Lymphocytes
Cycle 1 Day 23
|
143 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
104 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
131 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
—
|
—
|
67.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Absolute Values of Cluster of Differentiation 19 Plus (CD19+) for B-cell Lymphocytes
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
132 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
180 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
53.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
26.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation 31.1127
|
—
|
39.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Absolute Values of Cluster of Differentiation 19 Plus (CD19+) for B-cell Lymphocytes
Day 120 (End of study)
|
79.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
184 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
49.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
Mean and Standard Deviation could not be calculated due to high proportion of non-quantifiable values (\>30 percent \[%\] of values were imputed)
|
22.87 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation 18.17
|
—
|
44.0 10^3 cells per microliter
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1 and 2: Cycle 1, Day 23; Cycle 2, Day 1; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 4, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1 and Day 120 (end of study)Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
Blood samples were collected to analyze the presence of ADA that bind MT-3724. Number of participants with positive ADA confirmed has been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Confirmed
Cycle 1 Day 23
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Confirmed
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Confirmed
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Confirmed
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Confirmed
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Confirmed
Day 120 (end of study)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set.
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence or clinical investigation in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product(s) and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this experimental treatment(s). SAE is any untoward medical occurrence, at any dose; is fatal or life-threatening, is life-threatening, results in permanently disabling; results in unplanned in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in a congenital abnormality or birth defect; important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=11 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 3: Number of Participants Reporting Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Non-serious TEAEs
Serious TEAEs
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 3: Number of Participants Reporting Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Non-serious TEAEs
Non-serious TEAEs
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set.
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of laboratory parameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=11 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 26Population: Safety Set.
Standard resting 12-lead ECG assessments was performed after the participant has rested quietly for at least 5 minutes in supine or semi-recumbent position.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=11 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set.
Vital signs including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and body temperature were assessed at indicated time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=11 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 3: Number Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 26Population: Safety Set.
Physical examination was performed by a physician or a qualified delegate at the investigating site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=11 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Findings
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a CR or a PR as determined by independent, blinded central review.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set comprises of all participants who received any amount of MT-3724. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence or clinical investigation in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product(s) and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this experimental treatment(s). SAE is any untoward medical occurrence, at any dose; is fatal or life-threatening, is life-threatening, results in permanently disabling; results in unplanned in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in a congenital abnormality or birth defect; important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1 - 5 Micrograms/Kilogram/Dose (mcg/kg/Dose)
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2- 10 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3- 20 mcg/kg/Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4- 50 mcg/kg/Dose
n=4 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5- 100 mcg/kg/Dose
n=2 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6- 75 mcg/kg/Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of 21-Day cycle for up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 Participants
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants Reporting Worst Case Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Non-serious TEAEs
Serious TEAEs
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Part 1 and 2: Number of Participants Reporting Worst Case Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Non-serious TEAEs
Non-serious TEAEs
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination.
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) as determined by independent, blinded central review board.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a CR or a PR as determined by investigator assessment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
DOR defined as time from initial documentation of tumor response (CR or PR) to disease progression.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
DCR defined as percentage of participants who have achieved CR, PR and stable disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Cmax of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of tmax of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC (0-4), AUC (0-infinity) and AUClast of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of t1/2 of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Vz of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of CL of MT-3724 monotherapy
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Pharmacodynamics of MT-3724 was planned to be measured by B-cell count in participants with relapsed of refractory DCBCL using flow cytometry.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Pharmacodynamics of MT-3724 was planned to be measured by immunophenotyping in participants with relapsed of refractory DCBCL using flow cytometry.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Pharmacodynamics of MT-3724 was planned to be measured by circulating immunoglobulins in participants with relapsed of refractory DCBCL.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the presence of ADA that bind MT-3724.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Duration of response was defined as the time from the first occurrence of either complete or partial response to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression. Participants without evidence of progression were planned to be censored at time of last disease assessment. Only responders (CR or PR) were planned to be included for this analysis.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence or clinical investigation in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product(s) and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this experimental treatment(s). SAE is any untoward medical occurrence, at any dose; is fatal or life-threatening, is life-threatening, results in permanently disabling; results in unplanned in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in a congenital abnormality or birth defect; important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation such as important medical events according to medical or scientific judgement or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected for the analysis of laboratory parameters.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Safety Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Vital signs parameters including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, body temperature and body weight were planned to be analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 26Population: Safety Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Standard resting 12-lead ECG assessments was planned to be performed after the participant has rested quietly for at least 5 minutes in supine or semi-recumbent position.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 26Population: Safety Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Number of participants with any adverse events leading to cardiotoxicity when treated with MT-3724 was planned to be analyzed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with either a CR or a PR as determined by investigator assessment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
DCR was defined as percentage of participants who has achieved CR, PR and stable disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from study enrollment to the earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Full Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Overall survival was defined as the time from study enrollment to death from any cause.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Cmax of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Tmax of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of AUC (0-4), AUC (0-infinity) and AUClast of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of t1/2 of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of Vz of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated timepoints for the analysis of CL of MT-3724 monotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Pharmacodynamics of MT-3724 was planned to be measured by B-cell count in participants with relapsed of refractory DCBCL using flow cytometry.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Pharmacodynamics of MT-3724 was planned to be measured by immunophenotyping in participants with relapsed of refractory DCBCL using flow cytometry.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Pharmacodynamics of MT-3724 was planned to be measured by circulating immunoglobulins in participants with relapsed of refractory DCBCL.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 45Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set. The data was not collected due to early study termination
Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the presence of ADA that bind MT-3724.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Part 1: Cohort 1: 5 Micrograms/Kilograms/Dose/Day
Part 1: Cohort 2: 10 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
Part 1: Cohort 3: 20 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
Part 1: Cohort 4: 50 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
Part 1: Cohort 5: 100 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
Part 1: Cohort 6: 75 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
Part 3: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
Part 4: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1: 5 Micrograms/Kilograms/Dose/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2: 10 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3: 20 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4: 50 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=4 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5: 100 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=2 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6: 75 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=6 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 3: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
n=11 participants at risk
Participants in this arm received all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle
|
Part 4: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
Participants in this arm were planned to receive all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Superinfection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Capillary leak syndrome
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part 1: Cohort 1: 5 Micrograms/Kilograms/Dose/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 5 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 2: 10 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 10 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 3: 20 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 20 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 4: 50 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=4 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 50 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 5: 100 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=2 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 100 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 1: Cohort 6: 75 mcg/kg/Dose/Day
n=6 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 for the first cycle of experimental drug followed by 9 days observation (Days 13 - 21) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
|
Part 2: Cohort 7- MTD Expansion Cohort (50 or 75 mcg/kg/Dose)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants in this cohort received either 50 or 75 mcg/kg/dose/day on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 days of 21-Day cycle up to 4 additional cycles to explore safety, tolerability and tumor response to repeat doses of MT-3724.
|
Part 3: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
n=11 participants at risk
Participants in this arm received all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle
|
Part 4: All MT-3724 Treated Participants
Participants in this arm were planned to receive all doses of MT-3724 as IV infusion over 1 hour in a 21-day cycle
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypocapnia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
4/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary hypertension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract congestion
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cold sweat
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Capillary leak syndrome
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymph node pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Granulocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear disorder
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal exudates
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
100.0%
3/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Reflux gastritis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
45.5%
5/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
100.0%
3/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site irritation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site extravasation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Local swelling
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
100.0%
3/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
100.0%
4/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
4/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
54.5%
6/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
General disorders
Swelling face
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oropharyngeal candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyoderma
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory syncytial virus infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scratch
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood chloride increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactic acid increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Heart rate increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Troponin increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Failure to thrive
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
100.0%
2/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoproteinaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
100.0%
2/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
63.6%
7/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumor pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Horner's syndrome
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hyperaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Memory impairment
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Dysphoria
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
50.0%
3/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
66.7%
2/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
—
0/0 • Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected up to Day 45.
Non-serious TEAEs and SAEs were collected in Safety Set and categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade (1 to 5) where each grade is classified as grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening and grade 5=fatal. Number of participants with worst case grade \>=3 TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs has been presented. Part 2 was analyzed as a single arm as data was not collected for each dose level separately.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER