Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Outcomes of Seamless ADL Training Between Occupational Therapist and Nurse in Stroke Patients (NCT NCT02361307)
NCT ID: NCT02361307
Last Updated: 2021-08-10
Results Overview
Normalized gain The raw score from the self-care checklist for dressing and washing oneself was used to calculate the normalized gain. Because stroke patients had varying scores for their initial dressing and washing oneself abilities, their possible window of improvement could be limited by the "floor to ceiling" effect. Therefore, it was considered that their improvements should be assessed by the normalized gain, which was introduced by Hake as a rough measure of the effectiveness of a training course and has since become the standard method for reporting scores. Hake defined normalized gain (g) as the ratio of the actual gain to the maximum possible gain as given in the equation: Normalized gain (g) = (post-training) - (pre-training) / (maximum score) - (pre-training) With a possible value between 0.0-1.0, the normalized gain can be divided into 3 levels: ''high-g'' for g ≥ 0.7, ''medium-g'' for 0.3 ≤ g ˂0.7, and ''low-g'' for g ˂ 0.3 The higher score means a better outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
2 weeks
2021-08-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Conventional ADL Training
The control group receive the conventional ADL training program
|
Seamless ADL Training
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training program which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Conventional ADL Training
The control group receive the conventional ADL training program
|
Seamless ADL Training
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training program which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Unstable medical condition.
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
The Outcomes of Seamless ADL Training Between Occupational Therapist and Nurse in Stroke Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Conventional ADL Training
n=18 Participants
The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
Conventional ADL training: The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
|
Seamless ADL Training
n=17 Participants
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training programme which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
Seamless ADL training: The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training
|
Total
n=35 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
|
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=7 Participants
|
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self-care score
|
31.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=5 Participants
|
29.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=7 Participants
|
30.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksNormalized gain The raw score from the self-care checklist for dressing and washing oneself was used to calculate the normalized gain. Because stroke patients had varying scores for their initial dressing and washing oneself abilities, their possible window of improvement could be limited by the "floor to ceiling" effect. Therefore, it was considered that their improvements should be assessed by the normalized gain, which was introduced by Hake as a rough measure of the effectiveness of a training course and has since become the standard method for reporting scores. Hake defined normalized gain (g) as the ratio of the actual gain to the maximum possible gain as given in the equation: Normalized gain (g) = (post-training) - (pre-training) / (maximum score) - (pre-training) With a possible value between 0.0-1.0, the normalized gain can be divided into 3 levels: ''high-g'' for g ≥ 0.7, ''medium-g'' for 0.3 ≤ g ˂0.7, and ''low-g'' for g ˂ 0.3 The higher score means a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Conventional ADL Training
n=18 Participants
The control group receive the conventional ADL training program
Conventional ADL training: The control group receive the conventional ADL training program
|
Seamless ADL Training
n=17 Participants
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training programme which occupational therapists and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ability of Dressing and Bathing
|
0.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
0.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
Adverse Events
Conventional ADL Training
Seamless ADL Training
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place