Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Ingenol Mebutate Gel for Actinic Keratosis Applied on Large Area on Face, Scalp or Chest (NCT NCT02361216)
NCT ID: NCT02361216
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Results Overview
Complete resolution of actinic keratosis (AKclear100) at Week 8 is defined as 100% reduction from baseline in the number of clinically visible AKs
COMPLETED
PHASE3
729 participants
8 weeks
2025-03-10
Participant Flow
Subjects were followed for 8 weeks following the first application of investigational medicinal product (IMP) at Day 1 (3-day treatment period including an 8-week follow-up period) and for an additional 12 months following Week 8 (extended 12-month follow-up period).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.027% or vehicle gel was applied on either the full face, full balding scalp, or within a contiguous area of approximately 250 cm2 on the chest.
|
Vehicle Gel
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Vehicle: Vehicle gel
|
|---|---|---|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
STARTED
|
552
|
177
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
COMPLETED
|
541
|
158
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
19
|
|
12-month Follow-up
STARTED
|
541
|
157
|
|
12-month Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
489
|
130
|
|
12-month Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
52
|
27
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Ingenol mebutate gel 0.027% or vehicle gel was applied on either the full face, full balding scalp, or within a contiguous area of approximately 250 cm2 on the chest.
|
Vehicle Gel
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Vehicle: Vehicle gel
|
|---|---|---|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
Adverse Event
|
1
|
2
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
Unacceptable Local Skin Reaction (LSR)
|
1
|
0
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
11
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
Trial site closed
|
3
|
3
|
|
3 Day Treatment and 8 Week Follow/up
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of Ingenol Mebutate Gel for Actinic Keratosis Applied on Large Area on Face, Scalp or Chest
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=552 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Ingenol Mebutate
|
Vehicle
n=177 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Vehicle: Vehicle gel
|
Total
n=729 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68 years
n=5 Participants
|
69 years
n=7 Participants
|
68 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
149 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
194 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
403 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
535 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
304 participants
n=5 Participants
|
98 participants
n=7 Participants
|
402 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
188 participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 participants
n=7 Participants
|
247 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
60 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
80 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Of the 729 subjects randomised to treatment, 4 did not receive treatment. These 4 subjects (3 subjects in active treatment group and 1 in vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set (FAS), which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in active treatment group and 176 in corresponding vehicle group). AKclear100 is based on the FAS
Complete resolution of actinic keratosis (AKclear100) at Week 8 is defined as 100% reduction from baseline in the number of clinically visible AKs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=549 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days with ingenol mebutate with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
Vehicle
n=176 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days vehicle gel with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Actinic Keratosis (AK)
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
3.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: AKclear75 at Week 8 is based on the full analysis set (FAS)
Partial clearance (AKclear75 ) is defined as a reduction in the number of clinically visible AKs in the selected treatment area by at least 75% compared to baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=549 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days with ingenol mebutate with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
Vehicle
n=176 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days vehicle gel with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Partial Clearance at Week 8
|
59.4 percentage of participants
|
8.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeksPopulation: AKclear75 at Week 4 is based on the full analysis set (FAS)
Partial clearance (AKclear75) defined as a reduction in the number of clinically visible AKs in the selected treatment area by at least 75% compared to baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=549 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days with ingenol mebutate with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
Vehicle
n=176 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days vehicle gel with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Partial Clearance at Week 4
|
59.8 percentage of participants
|
9.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Percent reduction in AK count is based on the full analysis set (FAS)
Percent reduction in AK count in the selected treatment area at Week 8
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=549 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days with ingenol mebutate with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
Vehicle
n=176 Participants
Treatment once daily for 3 days vehicle gel with 8 week follow-up after initial treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Reduction From Baseline in AK Count
|
75.7 percentage reduction of AK count
Interval 73.9 to 77.3
|
12.7 percentage reduction of AK count
Interval 3.0 to 21.4
|
Adverse Events
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
Vehicle
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=549 participants at risk
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Ingenol Mebutate
|
Vehicle
n=176 participants at risk
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Vehicle: Vehicle gel
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.57%
1/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary Artery Occlusion
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Sternal Fracture
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.57%
1/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Intestinal Obstruction
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemothorax
|
0.18%
1/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur Fracture
|
0.00%
0/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.57%
1/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib Fracture
|
0.00%
0/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.57%
1/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal Fracture
|
0.00%
0/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.57%
1/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ingenol Mebutate Gel
n=549 participants at risk
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Ingenol Mebutate
|
Vehicle
n=176 participants at risk
Treatment once daily for 3 days
Vehicle: Vehicle gel
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Application Site Pain
|
63.8%
350/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.3%
4/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Pruritus
|
37.0%
203/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
4.0%
7/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
General disorders
Application Site Discomfort
|
5.1%
28/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.1%
2/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
General disorders
application site parasthesia
|
2.6%
14/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.1%
2/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
headache
|
4.0%
22/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.3%
4/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Eye disorders
eyelid oedema
|
2.6%
14/549 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/176 • 14 Months
A total of 729 subjects were randomised to treatment, of whom 4 did not receive treatment with IMP. These 4 subjects (3 subjects from the active treatment group and 1 from the corresponding vehicle group) were excluded from the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of 725 subjects (549 subjects in the active treatment group and 176 in the corresponding vehicle group). The Safety Analysis Set was the same as the Full Analysis Set.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place