Caecal pH as a Biomarker for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT02360384

Last Updated: 2016-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Irritable bowel syndrome is common. Currently, it is a diagnosis of exclusion. There is increasing evidence of the importance of the microbiota in the pathophysiology of this disorder. However, it has been challenging to measure the "activity" of the microbiota in vivo as much of the GI tract is inaccessible. Fermentation by the microbiota occurs in the colon, a by product of which are short chain fatty acids. Measuring pH in the colon could potentially act as a surrogate marker of fermentation. The investigators are undertaking a randomised controlled trial in patients with IBS measuring the pH in the digestive tract using a wireless motility capsule at baseline and in response to dietary changes in patients with diarrhoea predominant IBS and in response to linaclotide in those with constipation predominant IBS to ascertain the effect of these interventions on the microbiota and clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is an extremely common condition. Between 1.9 and 3.6 million patients consult a healthcare professional for IBS each year in the UK (1). The total population prevalence is much higher as most IBS sufferers are non-consulters due to the perceived lack of effective treatments. IBS can be sub-classified based upon predominating bowel habit, i.e. constipation predominant (IBS-C), alternating bowel habit (IBS-A) or diarrhoea predominant (2). In recent years, several efficacious treatment approaches have been applied to IBS including dietary interventions (low fibre and low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccha¬rides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP)), probiotics (VSL#3) and pharmacological agents (linaclotide) (3). Whilst each of these treatment approaches have shown efficacy, it is clear that further refinement of the IBS diagnostic algorithm is required to better target therapies in order to overcome the inherent heterogeneity within the IBS population.

Bloating and distension are both common and vexatious symptoms in a proportion of IBS patients. Bloating is largely regarded as a subjective sensation of abdominal swelling, whereas distension refers to an observable increase in abdominal girth. Bloating is associated with a reduction in quality of life, is a cause for healthcare seeking and represents a considerable challenge to manage effectively.

The anaerobic breakdown of carbohydrates and protein by bacteria, largely occurring within the proximal colon, is through a process known as fermentation, the principal products of which are short chain fatty acids (SCFA). One of the proposed mechanisms of bloating and distension is colonic dysbiosis and subsequent mal-fermentation. This has been supported by data which show that a large proportion of IBS patients improve symptomatically when restricting their diet to an 'elemental' formula for 2-4 weeks thus reducing the amount of fermentable material in the intestinal lumen.

The direct in vivo measurement of SCFA concentrations in the human proximal colon is technically difficult and invasive. Given that the degree of bacterial fermentation is directly proportional to the concentration of SCFA, the measurement of segmental intra-colonic pH is an inverse surrogate proxy of the degree of fermentation occurring within that territory. We have recently shown that measurement of caecal pH using the wireless motility capsule (WMC) in IBS and control patients is both technical feasible and able to differentiate between the two populations (4).

Our study showed that caecal pH is significantly lower in IBS when compared to controls thus supporting the concept that mal-fermentation is contributing to IBS symptomatology. Importantly, we have also shown that caecal pH is correlated with inhibition of caecal contractility which has led us to propose the idea that 'caecoparesis' maybe the long sought after alteration in motor function which differentiates IBS patients from healthy participants and explains why IBS preferentially experience pain in the right colon and upper abdomen in response to balloon distension.

TRIAL OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study is to demonstrate that caecal pH is a sensitive and reliable biomarker of caecal fermentation in IBS and that normalisation of the caecal pH environment will correlate with symptomatic improvement in IBS patients. We hypothesise that normalisation of the caecal pH environment with either dietary intervention or linaclotide will correlate with symptomatic improvement in IBS patients. To achieve this we will recruit a cohort of Rome III defined IBS patients and sub-divide them into the appropriate IBS type based on symptoms. We will then characterise their phenotype in terms of gastro-intestinal physiology (WMC + lactulose hydrogen breath test) and psychological profile. They will then be allocated to one of (2 or 3) treatment arms (control diet, low FODMAP diet, control diet + linaclotide). Each treatment arm will last for 28 days after which WMC will be repeated and symptoms assessed. Secondary aims will include characterising motility and transit in IBS-sub groups, determining the effect of the interventions of motility and transit, comparison of ileal and caecal pH profiles with hydrogen / methane breath testing data and comparison of symptom change and physiological assessment outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

wireless motility capsule

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sham diet

The placebo intervention will be healthy eating advice in patients with irritable bowel syndrome of the alternating subtype for 28 days.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Linaclotide

Intervention Type DRUG

Linaclotide 290mcg po od in all patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

Lincalotide

All patients with constipation predominant IBS will receive linaclotide 280mcg po od for 28 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Linaclotide

Intervention Type DRUG

Linaclotide 290mcg po od in all patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

FODMAP diet

The FODMAP diet will be introduced in patients with irritable bowel syndrome of the alternating subtype for 28 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FODMAP diet

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome with alternating bowel habit will be commenced on the either the low FODMAP diet or a control healthy eating diet.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Linaclotide

Linaclotide 290mcg po od in all patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

Intervention Type DRUG

FODMAP diet

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome with alternating bowel habit will be commenced on the either the low FODMAP diet or a control healthy eating diet.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Constella

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ability to provide Informed written consent
* Age (18-65 years old)
* Male and female patients with irritable bowel syndrome of the alternating or constipation subtype.

* Participants unable to provide informed consent.
* Participants on any medications that may influence gastrointestinal motility (e.g. beta-agonists).
* Pregnancy.
* Recent antibiotic use in the preceding 4 weeks.
* Recent probiotic use in the last 2 weeks, concurrent use of promotile medications.
* Participants with IBS-C who are already taking linaclotide or have known hypersensitivity to linaclotide.
* History of a systemic disorder with known gastrointestinal manifestations (such as diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disorders etc.) and previous gastrointestinal tract surgery will be treated as criteria for exclusion. Specific contraindications to WMC are dysphagia, recent abdominal surgery, Crohn's disease, planned MRI and diverticulitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adam Farmer

Consultant gastroenterologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adam D Farmer, PhD MRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology

London, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Farmer AD, Mohammed SD, Dukes GE, Scott SM, Hobson AR. Caecal pH is a biomarker of excessive colonic fermentation. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 7;20(17):5000-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24803812 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WMC1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id