Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency Between Complete Denture With Zero-degree Teeth and Anatomic Teeth in Patients With Severely Resorbed Ridge (NCT NCT02359955)
NCT ID: NCT02359955
Last Updated: 2015-05-20
Results Overview
the masseters EMG are recorded after patient wears complete denture for three months,EMGs of masseters of 20 chewing strokes were recorded in term of value of amp and duration,amplitude is reported here as the average value from 20 chewing strokes in units of "microvolts".
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
three months
2015-05-20
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Zero-degree Teeth, Then Anatomic Teeth
edentulous patients who were first treated with zero-degree teeth complete denture, then with anatomic teeth complete denture
|
Anatomic Teeth, Then Zero-degree Teeth
edentulous patients who were first treated with anatomic teeth complete denture, the with zero degree teeth complete denture
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency Between Complete Denture With Zero-degree Teeth and Anatomic Teeth in Patients With Severely Resorbed Ridge
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1
n=10 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with zero-degree teeth complete denture, then with anatomic teeth complete denture
zero degree teeth: zero degree teeth complete denture was first prescribed to patients in group 1 while patients in group 2 were treated with anatomic teeth complete denture
anatomic teeth: when anatomic teeth complete denture was prescribed to patients in group 1, patients in group 2 were treated with zero degree teeth complete denture
|
Group 2
n=10 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with anatomic teeth complete denture, the with zero degree teeth complete denture
zero degree teeth: zero degree teeth complete denture was first prescribed to patients in group 1 while patients in group 2 were treated with anatomic teeth complete denture
anatomic teeth: when anatomic teeth complete denture was prescribed to patients in group 1, patients in group 2 were treated with zero degree teeth complete denture
|
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=5 Participants
|
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29 • n=7 Participants
|
58.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: three monthsthe masseters EMG are recorded after patient wears complete denture for three months,EMGs of masseters of 20 chewing strokes were recorded in term of value of amp and duration,amplitude is reported here as the average value from 20 chewing strokes in units of "microvolts".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 Zero Degree Teeth
n=20 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with zero-degree teeth complete denture, then with anatomic teeth complete denture
|
Group 2 Anatomic Teeth
n=20 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with anatomic teeth complete denture, the with zero degree teeth complete denture
|
Group 1 Anatomic Teeth
n=20 Participants
|
Group 2 Zero Degree Teeth
n=20 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMG (Masseters EMG Are Recorded After Patient Wears Complete Denture for Three Months)
|
0.72 microvolts
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
0.87 microvolts
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.07 microvolts
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
1.21 microvolts
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: three monththe masseters EMG are recorded after patient wears complete denture for three months,EMGs of masseters of 20 chewing strokes were recorded in term of value of amp and duration, duration here is reporteds the average value from 20 chewing strokes in units of "millisecond".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 Zero Degree Teeth
n=20 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with zero-degree teeth complete denture, then with anatomic teeth complete denture
|
Group 2 Anatomic Teeth
n=20 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with anatomic teeth complete denture, the with zero degree teeth complete denture
|
Group 1 Anatomic Teeth
n=20 Participants
|
Group 2 Zero Degree Teeth
n=20 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMG (Masseters EMG Are Recorded After Patient Wears Complete Denture for Three Months)
|
247 millisecond
Standard Deviation 72
|
314 millisecond
Standard Deviation 82
|
306 millisecond
Standard Deviation 114
|
368 millisecond
Standard Deviation 102
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: three monthsthe masticatory efficiency is tested after patient wears complete denture for three months,each patient was given 4 gram dry peanuts, chewed for 20 seconds, then spat in the receptacle and rinsed mouth residue. The peanut particles were diluted to 1000 ml with distilled water, stirred for 1 minutes and standing for 2 minutes to suspension. Absorbance values(av) were measured at the wavelength of 590nm in a spectrophotometer. The higher the masticatory efficiency, the smaller the peanut particles, then the higher the av value, vice versa. Value of av was used to represent masticatory efficiency. For each patient, the test was conducted three times, and the average value of av was taken as the final result. A lower masticatory efficiency index indicates larger peanut particle size observed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 Zero Degree Teeth
n=10 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with zero-degree teeth complete denture, then with anatomic teeth complete denture
|
Group 2 Anatomic Teeth
n=10 Participants
edentulous patients who were first treated with anatomic teeth complete denture, the with zero degree teeth complete denture
|
Group 1 Anatomic Teeth
n=10 Participants
|
Group 2 Zero Degree Teeth
n=10 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Masticatory Efficiency Index
|
0.327 index score
Standard Deviation 0.0714
|
0.334 index score
Standard Deviation 0.072
|
0.3364 index score
Standard Deviation 0.0996
|
0.329 index score
Standard Deviation 0.0862
|
Adverse Events
Zero Degree Teeth,Then Anatomic Teeth
Anatomic Teeth, Then Zero-degree Teeth
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place