Study Evaluating Intravitreal hI-con1™ in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

NCT ID: NCT02358889

Last Updated: 2020-09-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, biological activity and pharmacodynamic effect of repeated intravitreal doses of hI-con1 0.3 mg administered as monotherapy and in combination with ranibizumab 0.5 mg compared to ranibizumab 0.5 mg monotherapy in treating patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Choroidal Neovascularization Age-related Macular Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

hI-con1

Patients will receive monthly intravitreal hI-con1 as monotherapy (plus sham injection) for the first 2 months followed by monthly treatment for 3 months, as needed, according to protocol criteria.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hI-con1

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravitreal injection of hI-con1 0.3 mg

Sham injection

Intervention Type OTHER

No injection is given, a needleless syringe is used to mimic an injection.

hI-con1 + ranibizumab

Patients will receive monthly intravitreal hI-con1 in combination with intravitreal ranibizumab for the first 2 months followed by monthly treatment for 3 months, as needed, according to protocol criteria.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hI-con1

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravitreal injection of hI-con1 0.3 mg

ranibizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 0.5 mg

ranibizumab

Patients will receive monthly intravitreal ranibizumab as monotherapy (plus sham injection) for the first 2 months followed by monthly treatment for 3 months, as needed, according to protocol criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ranibizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 0.5 mg

Sham injection

Intervention Type OTHER

No injection is given, a needleless syringe is used to mimic an injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hI-con1

Intravitreal injection of hI-con1 0.3 mg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

ranibizumab

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 0.5 mg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Sham injection

No injection is given, a needleless syringe is used to mimic an injection.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

human Immuno-conjugate 1 Lucentis®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males or females of any race at least 50 years of age
* Active primary Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) in the study eye
* Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of 70 to 24 letters (worse than 20/40 up to 20/320) in the study eye

Exclusion Criteria

* Monocular patient or patient with a BCVA of 35 or fewer letters (20/200 or worse) in the better seeing eye
* Any prior treatment of CNV or advanced AMD in the study eye, except for dietary supplements or vitamins
* Any intraocular or ocular surface surgery (including cataract surgery and laser procedures) in the study eye within 3 months
* Vitrectomy in the study eye
* Hereditary or chronic hemorrhagic or coagulopathy conditions (i.e., hemophilia)
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Iconic Therapeutics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabriela Burian, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Iconic Therapeutics, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arcadia, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Campbell, California, United States

Site Status

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Mountain View, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Desert, California, United States

Site Status

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Golden, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Panama City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Stuart, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Hauppauge, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Abilene, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Silverdale, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IT-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.