Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effects of Remote Microphone Hearing Aids on Children With Auditory Processing Disorder (NCT NCT02353091)
NCT ID: NCT02353091
Last Updated: 2020-05-05
Results Overview
Children questionnaire measured in raw scores. This is the total score of 9 questions on a likert scale from 0 to 5. Thus, this is the summed score. Therefore, minimum value 0, maximum value 45. Higher scores mean better outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
Baseline to 6 months
2020-05-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
APD Control Group
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and did not receive an intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and rdid not receive an intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
Total
n=26 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
116 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=13 Participants
|
115 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1 • n=13 Participants
|
115 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9 • n=26 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=26 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=26 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
13 participants
n=13 Participants
|
13 participants
n=13 Participants
|
26 participants
n=26 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: An outlier at the 3-month time-point (at -3.25 SDs) was removed
Children questionnaire measured in raw scores. This is the total score of 9 questions on a likert scale from 0 to 5. Thus, this is the summed score. Therefore, minimum value 0, maximum value 45. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=12 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Listening Inventory For Education Revised (LIFE-R) - Total Score
Baseline
|
30.91 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.46
|
28.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.44
|
|
Listening Inventory For Education Revised (LIFE-R) - Total Score
3 months
|
33.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.59
|
35.61 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
|
Listening Inventory For Education Revised (LIFE-R) - Total Score
6 months
|
30.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
33.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.66
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsSpeech in noise test measured in z scores. Minimum value -2, maximum value +2. Higher scores mean better outcome. Z scores are automatically calculated in the computer test software based on normative sample data on decibel (dB) measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Low-cue Speech Reception Threshold Condition
3 months
|
-0.46 z scores
Standard Error 1.43
|
-0.63 z scores
Standard Error 1.61
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Low-cue Speech Reception Threshold Condition
Baseline
|
-0.56 z scores
Standard Error 0.90
|
-0.99 z scores
Standard Error 1.12
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Low-cue Speech Reception Threshold Condition
6 months
|
-1.38 z scores
Standard Error 3.33
|
-1.05 z scores
Standard Error 1.51
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: One outlier in the intervention group was found. Outlier was removed as participant had decreased focus and difficulty remaining seated during this condition.
Speech in noise test measured in z scores. Minimum value -2, maximum value +2. Higher scores mean better outcome. Z scores are automatically calculated in the computer test software based on normative sample data on decibel (dB) measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=12 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - High-cue Speech Reception Threshold Condition
6 months
|
-1.23 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
-0.68 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - High-cue Speech Reception Threshold Condition
Baseline
|
-0.83 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
-1.27 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - High-cue Speech Reception Threshold Condition
3 months
|
-0.70 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
-0.60 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsSpeech in noise test measured in z scores. Minimum value -2, maximum value +2. Higher scores mean better outcome. Z scores are automatically calculated in the computer test software based on normative sample data on decibel (dB) measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Talker Advantage Condition
Baseline
|
-1.01 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-0.84 z scores
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Talker Advantage Condition
3 months
|
-0.32 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.59 z scores
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Talker Advantage Condition
6 months
|
-0.44 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-0.68 z scores
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsSpeech in noise test measured in z scores. Minimum value -2, maximum value +2. Higher scores mean better outcome. Z scores are automatically calculated in the computer test software based on normative sample data on decibel (dB) measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Spatial Advantage Condition
Baseline
|
-1.50 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
-0.97 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Spatial Advantage Condition
3 months
|
-1.31 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
-0.99 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Spatial Advantage Condition
6 months
|
-0.98 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
-0.53 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: One outlier in the intervention group was found. Outlier was removed as participant had decreased focus and difficulty remaining seated during this condition.
Speech in noise test measured in z scores. Minimum value -2, maximum value +2. Higher scores mean better outcome. Z scores are automatically calculated in the computer test software based on normative sample data on decibel (dB) measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=12 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Total Advantage Condition
6 months
|
-0.63 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.30 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Total Advantage Condition
Baseline
|
-0.56 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
-0.94 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
|
Listening in Spatialised Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) - Total Advantage Condition
3 months
|
-0.52 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-0.47 z scores
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsA validated attention test to test children's auditory attention. Measured on scaled scores. Minimum value 1, maximum value 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Sustained Auditory Attention Subscale
Baseline
|
9.76 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
6.30 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Sustained Auditory Attention Subscale
3 months
|
7.76 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
6.61 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.84
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Sustained Auditory Attention Subscale
6 months
|
8.23 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 4.22
|
5.76 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsA validated attention test to test children's auditory-visual attention. Measured on scaled scores. Minimum value 1, maximum value 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Divided Auditory-Visual Attention Subscale
Baseline
|
6.61 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
2.38 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Divided Auditory-Visual Attention Subscale
3 months
|
5.23 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
5.15 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Divided Auditory-Visual Attention Subscale
6 months
|
5.92 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.25
|
5.76 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsA validated attention test to test children's visual attention. Measured on scaled scores. Minimum value 1, maximum value 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Selective Visual Attention Subscale
Baseline
|
9.69 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
6.00 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Selective Visual Attention Subscale
3 months
|
10.30 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
8.30 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Selective Visual Attention Subscale
6 months
|
10.92 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
9.61 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsA validated attention test to test children's auditory attention. Measured on scaled scores. Minimum value 1, maximum value 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Divided Auditory Attention Subscale
6 months
|
8.69 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 4.17
|
6.07 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Divided Auditory Attention Subscale
Baseline
|
9.15 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.13
|
6.53 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.12
|
|
Test of Everyday Attention for Children TEACh - Divided Auditory Attention Subscale
3 months
|
8.61 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 4.21
|
6.76 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsParental questionnaire measured in raw unstandardised scores. Minimum value is -5, maximum value is +1. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Noise Subscale
Baseline
|
-2.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Noise Subscale
3 months
|
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
-2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Noise Subscale
6 months
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsParental questionnaire measured in raw unstandardised scores. Minimum value is -5, maximum value is +1. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Multiple Inputs Subscale
Baseline
|
-1.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-1.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Multiple Inputs Subscale
3 months
|
-1.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Multiple Inputs Subscale
6 months
|
-1.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsParental questionnaire measured in raw unstandardised scores. Minimum value is -5, maximum value is +1. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Auditory Memory Sequencing Subscale
Baseline
|
-1.77 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-2.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Auditory Memory Sequencing Subscale
3 months
|
-2.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
-2.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Auditory Memory Sequencing Subscale
6 months
|
-2.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
-2.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsParental questionnaire measured in raw unstandardised scores. Minimum value is -5, maximum value is +1. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Auditory Attention Span Subscale
Baseline
|
-1.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-1.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Auditory Attention Span Subscale
3 months
|
-1.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-1.57 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Children's Auditory Performance Scale - Auditory Attention Span Subscale
6 months
|
-1.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-1.77 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: One parent from intervention group did not complete any of the questionnaires, hence intervention group number analysed was 12.
Parental questionnaire. Average composite of scaled scores are used to calculate the outcome, so units are scaled scores. Maximum value is 1, maximum value is 19. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=12 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Children's Communication Checklist - 2 - Standard Language Composite Score
Baseline
|
5.82 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
5.44 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
The Children's Communication Checklist - 2 - Standard Language Composite Score
3 months
|
6.03 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
5.39 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.88
|
|
The Children's Communication Checklist - 2 - Standard Language Composite Score
6 months
|
6.50 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
5.58 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 monthsPopulation: One parent from intervention group did not complete any of the questionnaires, hence intervention group number analysed was 12.
Parental questionnaire. Average composite of scaled scores are used to calculate the outcome, so units are scaled scores. Maximum value is 1, maximum value is 19. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
n=13 Participants
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=12 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Children's Communication Checklist - 2 - Non-Standard Language Composite Score
Baseline
|
6.25 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.82
|
6.19 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
|
The Children's Communication Checklist - 2 - Non-Standard Language Composite Score
3 months
|
6.38 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
6.08 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
|
The Children's Communication Checklist - 2 - Non-Standard Language Composite Score
6 months
|
6.61 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 3.06
|
5.70 scaled scores
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Only 5 questionnaires given to teachers were returned, all from the intervention group. The data for these 5 questionnaires are presented in the APD Group 2, as all 5 cases are from that group only. Group 1 has no data.
Raw unstandardised score measured in Likert Scale (5 scales). Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 5. Higher score means better outcome. The three Attention Subscales are averaged to create one combined score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
APD Control Group
Comprised of 13 children diagnosed with APD and does not receive any intervention.
|
APD Intervention Group
n=5 Participants
Comprised 13 children diagnosed with APD and received the Remote Microphone Hearing Aid intervention right after baseline and for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Screening Instrument For Targeting Educational Risk Performance Scale - Attention Subscale
Baseline
|
—
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
|
Screening Instrument For Targeting Educational Risk Performance Scale - Attention Subscale
6 months
|
—
|
2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
Adverse Events
APD Control Group
APD Intervention Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place