Prospective, Multi-Center Evaluation of the Efficacy of Peripheral Trigger Decompression Surgery for Migraine Headaches
NCT ID: NCT02351544
Last Updated: 2024-04-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Botulinum toxin A injection into trigger sites has been shown in multiple studies to be effective at reducing the frequency and severity of migraine headaches, and is a very commonly administered treatment for refractory migraines. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of chronic migraines.
Similarly, surgical decompression of trigger sites has previously been shown to have superior clinical outcomes to medical management, through a randomized, blinded controlled-trial performed at Case Western Reserve in 2009. Patients either received actual decompression of the trigger sites, or sham surgery (exposure and visualization of the trigger sites, without decompression). At one-year follow-up, the group who underwent actual surgery demonstrated a statistically higher proportion with significant improvement in their migraines (83.7% vs. 57.7%, p=0.014), and with complete elimination of their migraines (57.1% vs. 3.8%, p\<0.001). Several other reports have confirmed the good clinical outcomes of surgery demonstrated in this trial, and surgical decompression is now commonly performed by several surgeons around the United States.
Prognostic factors predicting the success of surgical decompression in migraine headache treatment include older age of migraine onset, visual symptoms/aura, and 4-site decompression. Factors predicting failure of surgery include excessive operative blood loss, and surgery on only one or two trigger sites.
One criticism of the studies on peripheral trigger decompression surgery for migraines has been that most of the results have originated from the same institution (Case Western Reserve), and from the same author (Guyuron). While several studies at other institutions have demonstrated positive outcomes of peripheral trigger decompression, these have only included a small number of patients.
In addition, the sham surgery randomized-controlled trial has been criticized for not clarifying any prior treatments that patients had undergone before peripheral trigger deactivation, and for not showing how medication use patterns changed after surgery. Another criticism of that study was the fact that patients were examined by neurologists before the study but not after the study, and that surgery was performed on some patients with episodic migraines, who are known to not benefit from botulinum toxin. It is unclear what migraine types are most likely to benefit from surgical decompression.
The investigators' goal is to perform a multi-center, prospective trial to demonstrate the effectiveness of peripheral trigger decompression in the treatment of migraine headaches, which would address the criticisms mentioned above. The main aim is to demonstrate that the positive results demonstrated by Guyuron et al are reproducible at other institutions and by other surgeons using similar techniques on different patient populations.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electrical Stimulation of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion for the Treatment of Migraine Headaches
NCT01294046
Pulsed Radiofrequency vs. Steroid Injections for Occipital Neuralgia
NCT01670825
Short-term Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation in Reducing Migraine Related Pain
NCT02438553
Pulsed Radiofrequency in Chronic Headaches
NCT04339335
A Feasibility Clinical Trial to Evaluate High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Migraine
NCT01653340
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Botulinum toxin
Patients in this arm will receive botulinum toxin for migraine headaches
Botulinum Toxin Type A
Daily headache diary
Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS)
Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire (MWPLQ)
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Surgery
Patients in this arm will receive surgery for migraine headaches
Surgery
Daily headache diary
Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS)
Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire (MWPLQ)
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Botulinum Toxin Type A
Surgery
Daily headache diary
Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS)
Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire (MWPLQ)
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with chronic migraine (≥15 days per month) as dictated by the FDA indication for botulinum, and as diagnosed by a board-certified neurologist
* Patients with episodic migraines
* Those patients are included because there is no consensus whether surgical decompression is effective for chronic migraines only, or for chronic and episodic migraines. One of the goals of this trial is to determine this.
* Patients who respond to diagnostic botulinum toxin injection or to a diagnostic anesthetic block
* Patients who have failed 2 of 3 classes of preventative migraine medications
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with systemic conditions that make them poor candidates for surgery (coronary artery disease, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, etc…)
* Patients with migraines related to inferior turbinate hypertrophy or septal deviation
* Patients with a frontal, temporal or occipital trigger point who do not respond to a diagnostic botulinum toxin injection or to a diagnostic anesthetic block
* Hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin preparation or to any of the components in the formulation
* Infection at the proposed injection site for botulinum
* Patients with trigger points at minor trigger sites (lesser occipital nerve, third occipital nerve)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
OTHER
Ohio State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey Janis
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peled Plastic Surgery
San Francisco, California, United States
Premier Plastic Surgery of Kansas City
Olathe, Kansas, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Neuropax Clinic
St Louis, Missouri, United States
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
The University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015H0024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.