Phase III Study of Vinflunine Plus Methotrexate Versus Methotrexate Alone in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02347332

Last Updated: 2019-03-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

459 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-25

Study Completion Date

2018-11-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For patients relapsing after platinum-based therapy, few data are available. The current use of cetuximab associated with radiotherapy in localized disease and associated with platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting stresses the need for new therapeutic options at later stages of SCCHN.Vinca-alkaloids demonstrated activity in SCCHN. Vinflunine demonstrated superior antitumour activity to vinorelbine in preclinical animal models. Recent preliminary phase I results of the vinflunine plus methotrexate combination in SCCHN, based on a clinical review, show encouraging antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile. Therefore the combination of vinflunine and methotrexate appears a promising salvage regimen after platinum failure.

The present study has been designed as a multicenter, randomised phase III study which will compare the combination of IV vinflunine with methotrexate to methotrexate alone in SCCHN patients having failed platinum-based therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was designed to compare the OS of VFL plus MTX versus MTX alone in patients with SCCHN who had failed platinum-based chemotherapy.

The trial was designed in accordance with current standards used routinely in oncology phase III trials and used established methods of assessment. The RECIST (version 1.1) and NCI CTCAE (version 3.0) guidelines are internationally recognised methods for assessing efficacy and tolerance, respectively.

The patient population was appropriate for this type of phase III study and included adult patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, who had received prior chemotherapy regimens with documented progression. This population of patients was considered appropriate to meet the study objectives.

Recent preliminary phase I results of the VFL plus MTX combination in SCCHN, reported in a clinical review, showed encouraging antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile A number of chemotherapy agents have been reported as having single-agent activity in SCCHN. However, reliable evidence of efficacy in the second-line setting is lacking, and there is currently no established standard of care. MTX used alone as the reference regimen at a dose of 40 mg/m2/week can be considered as the best available evidence-based option. Also, other trials using this comparator have demonstrated that it is generally accepted as a reasonable choice, and is often used in general practice.

The efficacy and safety assessments employed in this study are standard measures routinely used in studies of this type

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vinflunine plus methotrexate

vinflunine IV 280 mg/m² Day 1 plus methotrexate IV 30 mg/m² Day 1 and Day 8 every 3 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vinflunine

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate

methotrexate IV 40 mg/m² Day 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vinflunine

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

JAVLOR VFL MTX

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma
* Documented progressive disease after chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced or recurrent/metastatic SCCHN which included a platinum derivative
* Measurable or non measurable disease
* adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions
* WHO performance status \< 1

Exclusion Criteria

* Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
* History of brain or leptomeningeal involvement
* Albumin level \< 35 g/L
* Patients with weight loss ≥ 5% within the last 3 months
* Grade \> 2 peripheral neuropathy at study entry
* "Third space" fluids (pleural effusion, ascites, massive edema)
* Prior treatment with vinca-alkaloids and methotrexate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pierre Fabre Medicament

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zahida Issiakhem, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

L00070 IN 309 F0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.