Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund- Continued (Coco)

NCT ID: NCT02344056

Last Updated: 2016-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

154 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund (CogniDo) and the Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund PLUS (CogniDo PLUS) investigated the short-term effects of having school lunch versus skipping it on children's basal (CogniDo) and executive (CogniDo PLUS) cognitive functions in the afternoon. The present Coco study connect this two previous studies and investigates the effect of having school lunch versus skipping it on children's basal and executive cognitive functions later in the afternoon.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Because of cerebral particularities, children may react highly sensitive to variations of nutrient supply. Therefore, an optimised composition of meals at favourable mealtime should be considered for optimal cognitive performance. The increasing implementation of all-day schools in Germany requires the children's catering for lunch at school. However, the number of 'meal skippers' is increasing among children and adolescents. Thus, the effect of skipping lunch at school on cognitive functioning is examined in this experimental cross-over trial. As prior intake of food can have an influence on the physiological effect of test meal, the children's dietary intake in the mid-morning is standardized. The intervention is integrated in everyday school life:

9.15 a.m. standardized snack within the frame of the regular break, 9.45 a.m. to 12.25 p.m. everyday school life, 12.25 p.m. either lunch (control) or water as a beverage (intervention of 'skipping meal'), 12.45 p.m. to 1.15 p.m. regular lunch break, 1.15 p.m. to 14.10 p.m. regular school lesson. 14.15 p.m. computerized tests of executive cognitive and basal (alertness) functioning, 3 p.m. lunch for the 'skipping meal'-group. Parameters of cognition with relevance to everyday school life are measured by a computerized test program developed by the Institute of Working Learning and Aging (ALA). Usual eating behaviour, sleep behaviour, physical activity and parental education were determined as control variables by questionnaires for children, parents.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Function

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Having Lunch Skipping Lunch

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

having lunch/skipping lunch

Lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and no lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Having lunch/skipping lunch

Intervention Type OTHER

Lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and no lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

skipping lunch/having lunch

no lunch on test day 1 and lunch ad libitum on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skipping lunch/having lunch

Intervention Type OTHER

No lunch on test day 1 and lunch ad libitum on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Having lunch/skipping lunch

Lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and no lunch on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

Intervention Type OTHER

Skipping lunch/having lunch

No lunch on test day 1 and lunch ad libitum on test day 2. Water at libitum was constantly available on both days.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All fifth and sixth grade students of Gesamtschule Berger Feld with the consent of parents and child

Exclusion Criteria

* Metabolic diseases or special diet
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Dortmund

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Dortmund

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RIChildNutrition

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id